Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Women’s finger pressure sensitivity at rest and recalled body awareness during partnered sexual activity

Abstract

Greater vibrotactile sensitivity has been related to better erectile function in men, and vibrotactile and pressure tactile sensitivity have been related to better sexual function in women. Our previous study found that, for both sexes, greater recalled body awareness during last sexual relation correlated with greater recalled desire and arousal. Using the same sample of that study (68 women and 48 men, recruited in the Lisbon area, Portugal), we tested if greater recalled body awareness during last sexual relation correlates with tactile pressure sensitivity, as assessed by von Frey microfilaments. In simple and partial correlations controlling for social desirability and smoking before last sex, the hypothesis was confirmed for women, but not for men. Greater tactile sensitivity might enhance sexual arousal through greater awareness of the body during sex, and/or more frequent and pleasant body sensations during sex might lead to greater tactile sensitivity in nonsexual situations. Pressure sensitivity might be more closely linked to sexual arousal in women than in men.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Rowland DL, Haensel SM, Blom JHM, Slob K . Penile sensitivity in men with premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction. J Sex Marital Ther 1993; 19: 189–197.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Rowland DL, Leentvaar EJ, Blom JHM, Slob AK . Changes in penile sensitivity following papaverine-induced erection in sexually functional and dysfunctionalmen. J Urol 1991; 146: 1018–1021.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Morrissette DL, Goldstein MK, Raskin DB, Rowland DL . Finger and penile tactile sensitivity in sexually functional and dysfunctional diabetic men. Diabetologia 1999; 42: 336–342.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Edwards AE, Husted JR . Penile sensitivity, age, and sexual behavior. J Clin Psychol 1976; 32: 697–700.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Paick JS, Jeong H, Park MS . Penile sensitivity in men with premature ejaculation. Int J Impot Res 1998; 10: 247–250.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Salonia A, Sacca A, Briganti A, Del Carro U, Deho F, Zanni G et al. Quantitative sensory testing of peripheral thresholds in patients with lifelong premature ejaculation: a case controlled study. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 1755–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Xia JD, Jiang HS, Zhu LL, Zhang Z, Chen H, Dai YT . Somatosensory evoked potentials assess the efficacy of circumcision for premature ejaculation. Int J Impot Res 2016; 28: 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Esposito K, Ciotola M, Giuliano F, Carleo D, Schisano B, Maglione E et al. Quantitative sensory and autonomic testing in nondiabetic women with sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 1367–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Frohlich P, Meston CM . Tactile sensitivity in women with sexual arousal disorder. Arch Sex Behav 2005; 34: 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Frohlich P, Meston CM . Fluoxetine-induced changes in tactile sensation and sexual functioning among clinically depressed women. J Sex Marital Ther 2005; 31: 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Brody S, Fisher AH, Hess U . Women’s finger sensitivity correlates with partnered sexual behavior, but not solitary masturbation frequencies. J Sex Marital Ther 2008; 34: 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Brody S, Houde S, Hess U . Greater tactile sensitivity and less use of immature psychological mechanisms predict women’s penile-vaginal intercourse orgasm. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 3057–3065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Jiao C, Knight PK, Weerakoon P, Turman AB . Effects of visual erotic stimulation on vibrotactile detection thresholds in men. Arch Sex Behav 2007; 36: 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Payne KA, Binik YM, Pukall CF, Thaler L, Amsel R, Khalifé S . Effects of sexual arousal on genital and non-genital sensation: a comparison of women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome and healthy controls. Arch Sex Behav 2007; 36: 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    van Lankveld JJ, van den Hout, Schouten EG . The effects of self-focused attention, performance demand, and dispositional sexual self-consciousness on sexual arousal of sexually functional and dysfunctional men. Behav Res Ther 2004; 42: 915–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Seal BN, Meston CM . The impact of body awareness on sexual arousal in women with sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 990–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Costa RM, Pestana J, Costa D, Wittmann M . Altered states of consciousness are related to higher sexual responsiveness. Conscious Cog 2016; 42: 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Ruggieri V, Milizia M, Sabatini N, Tosi MT . Body perception in relation to muscular tone at rest and tactile sensitivity to tickle. Percept Mot Skills 1983; 56: 799–806.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Dambrun M . When the dissolution of perceived body boundaries elicits happiness: The effect of selflessness induced by a body scan meditation. Conscious Cog 2016; 46: 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Pfeifer E, Sarikaya A, Wittmann M . Changes in states of consciousness during a period of silence after a session of depth relaxation music therapy (DRMT). Music Med 2016; 8: 180–186.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Stoelting Co Touch Test Sensory Evaluators (Operation Manual). Stoelting CO: Wood Dale, IL, 2001.

  22. 22

    Ballard R . Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Psychol Rep 1992; 72:, 1155–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Meston CM, Heiman JR, Trapnell PD, Paulhus DL . Socially desirable responding and sexuality self‐reports. J Sex Res 1998; 35: 148–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Cao S, Gan Y, Dong X, Liu J, Lu Z . Association of quantity and duration of smoking with erectile dysfunction: a dose-response meta-analysis. J Sex Med 2014; 11: 2376–2384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Costa RM, Peres L . Smoking is unrelated to female sexual function. Subst Use Misuse 2015; 50: 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Craig AD . How Do You Feel? An Interoceptive Moment with Your Neurobiological Self. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded with grants from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FRH/BPD/76130/2011 and UID/PSI/04810/2013) and Fundação BIAL (nº 103/12). Finger pressure sensitivity at rest and recalled body awareness during partnered sexual activity.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Costa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Costa, R., Pestana, J., Costa, D. et al. Women’s finger pressure sensitivity at rest and recalled body awareness during partnered sexual activity. Int J Impot Res 29, 157–159 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2017.13

Download citation

Search

Quick links