Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Geometrical modified nesbit corporoplasty to correct different types of penile curvature: description of the surgical procedure based on geometrical principles and long-term results

Abstract

We present the use of a modified corporoplasty, based on geometrical principles, to determine the exact site for the incision in the tunica or plaque and the exact amount of albuginea for overlaying to correct with extreme precision the different types of congenital or acquired penile curvature due to Peyronie’s disease. To describe our experience with a new surgical procedure for the enhancement of penile curvature avoiding any overcorrection or undercorrection. Between March 2004 and April 2013, a total of 74 patients underwent the geometrical modified corporoplasty. All patients had congenital curvature until 90° or acquired stable penile curvature ‘less’ than 60°, that made sexual intercourse very difficult or impossible, normal erectile function, absence of hourglass or hinge effect. Preoperative testing included a physical examination, 3 photographs (frontal, dorsal and lateral) of penis during erection, a 10 mcg PGE1-induced erection and Doppler ultrasound, administration of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) questionnaire. A follow-up with postoperative evaluation at 12 weeks, 12 and 24 months, included the same preoperative testing. Satisfaction rates were better assessed with the use of validated questionnaire such as the International Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of the Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS). Statistical analysis with Student’s t-test was performed using commercially available, personal computer software. A total of 25 patients had congenital penile curvature with a mean deviation of 46.8° (range 40–90), another 49 patients had Peyronie’s disease with a mean deviation of 58.4 (range 45–60). No major complications were reported. Postoperative correction of the curvature was achieved in all patients (100%). Neither undercorrection nor overcorrection were recorded. No significant relapse (curvature>15°) occurred in our patients. Shortening of the penis was reported by 74% but did not influence the high overall satisfaction of 92% (patients completely satisfied with their sexual life). The erectile function was analyzed in both groups, Student’s t-test showed a significant improvement in erectile function, preoperative average IIEF-15 scores were 17.43±4.67, whereas postoperatively it was 22.57±4.83 (P=0.001). This geometrical modified Nesbit corporoplasty is a valid therapy which allows penile straightening. The geometric principles make the technique reproducible in multicentre studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosen R, Catania J, Lue T, Althof S, Henne J, Hellstrom W et al. Impact of Peyronie’s disease on sexual and psychological functioning: qualitative findings in patients in patients and controls. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 1997–84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Conti SL, Turek P, Lue T . Risk factors for emotional and relationship problems in Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 2179–2184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Sakka AI, Hassoba HM, Chui RM, Bhatagar RS, Dahiya R, Lue TF . An animal model of Peyronie’s like condition associated with an increase of transforming growth factor beta mRNA and protein expression. J Urol 1997; 158: 2284–2290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Larsen SM, Levine LA . Review of non surgical treatment options for Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res 2012; 24: 1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Langston JP, Carson CC 3rd . Peyronie’s disease: plication or grafting. Urol Clin North Am 2011; 38: 207–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levine LA, Larsen SM . Surgery for Peyronie’s. Asian J Androl 2013; 15: 27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung E, Clendinning E, Lessars L, Brock G . Five-year follow-up of Peyronie’s graft surgery: outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 594–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson SK . Surgical techniques: modeling technique for penile curvature. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 2231–2234.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Lue TF . Peyronie’s disease: a critical appraisal of current diagnosis and treatment. Int J Impot Res 2008; 20: 445–459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelamy A . Autophotography in evaluation of functional penis disorders. Urology 1983; 21: 628–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A . The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rolle L, Tamagnone C, Timpano M, Destefanis P, Fiori C, Ceruti C et al. The nessbit operation for penile curvature: an easy and effective technical modification. J Urol 2005; 173: 171–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Montorsi F, Adaikan G, Becher E, Giuliano F, Khoury S, Lue TF et al. Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 3572–3588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ralph D, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Mirone V, Perovic S, Sohn M, Usta M et al. The management of Peyronie’s disease: Evidence-based 2010 guidelines. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 2359–2374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kadioglu A, Akman T, Sanli O, Gurkan L, Cakan M, Celtik M . Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a critical analysis. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 235–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hauptmann A, Diemer T, Weidner W . Peyronie’s disease: diagnostics and therapy. Urologe A 2011; 50: 609–620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsieh J-T, Liu S-P, Chen Y, Chang H-C, Yu H-J, Chen C-H . Correction of congenital penile curvature using modified tunical plication with absorbable sutures: the long-term outcome and patient satisfaction. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 261–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Poulsen J, Kirkeby HJ . Treatment of penile curvature—A retrospective study of 175 patients operated with plication of the tunica albuginea or with the Nesbit procedure. Br J Urol 1995; 75: 370–374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brake M, Keller H, Lamade F, Groh R, Horsch R . Surgical correction of penile deviation. Nesbit vs. Schroeder–Essed method. Urologe A 1999; 38: 264–269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schultheiss D, Meschi MR, Hagemann J, Truss MC, Stief CG, Jonas U . Congenital and acquired penile deviation treated with the Essed plication method. Eur Urol 2000; 38: 167–171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scharzer JU, Steinfatt H . Tunica albuginea underlap – a new modification of Nesbit Procedure: description of the technique and preliminary results. J Sex Med 2012; 9: 2970–2974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gelbard MK . Relaxing incisions in the correction of penile deformity due to Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1995; 154: 1457–1460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Egydio PH, Lucon AM, Arap S . A single relaxing incision to correct different types of penile curvature: surgical technique based on geometrical principles. BJU Int 2004; 94: 1147–1157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gur S, Limin M, Hellstrom WJ . Current status and new developments in Peyronie’s disease: medical, minimally invasive and surgical treatment options. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2011; 12: 931–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cormio L, Zucchi A, Lorusso F, Selvaggio O, Fioretti F, Porena M et al. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease by plaque incision and grafting with buccal mucosa. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 1469–1475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuehass FE, Egydio PH . The STAGE technique (superficial tunica albuginea geometric-based excision) for the correction of biplanar congenit al penile curvature. J Sex Med 2014; 11: 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Greenfield JM, Lucas S, Levine LA . Factors affecting the loss of length associated with tunica albuginea plication for correction of penile curvature. J Urol 2006; 175: 238–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Vicini.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vicini, P., Di Nicola, S., Antonini, G. et al. Geometrical modified nesbit corporoplasty to correct different types of penile curvature: description of the surgical procedure based on geometrical principles and long-term results. Int J Impot Res 28, 209–215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2016.28

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2016.28

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links