Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Efficacy of vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) after radical prostatectomy: the initial Irish experience of a dedicated VED clinic

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 28, pages 205–208 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding optimal penile rehabilitation program following radical prostatectomy (RP). Vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) have become an important component of penile rehabilitation protocols. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and patient satisfaction of a dedicated VED clinic. A voluntary telephone questionnaire was performed of all patients who attended a VED clinic to date in two university teaching hospitals. Patient demographics, histopathological characteristics and functional status (International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores) were obtained from a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Sixty-five men attended the dedicated VED clinic in the two university teaching hospitals. Forty-men (76.3%) men purchased a VED following the dedicated clinic. There was significant differences noted between the mean preoperative and the 3-month postoperative IIEF scores (22.08±3.16 vs 11.3±3.08, P=0.0001) and between the 3-month postoperative IIEF score and the post-VED use IIEF score (11.3±3.08 vs 16.74±2.62, P=0.0001). Despite VED use, there was a significant reduction in erectile function from presurgery status (22.08±3.16 vs 16.74±2.62, P=0.0001). All patients reported that the dedicated VED was helpful and would recommend it to other patients. Our study demonstrates that, despite a reduction in erectile function after RP, successful erections are attainable with a VED. There is potential and need for the development of a standard penile rehabilitation program and treatment of ED after RP internationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raina R, Pahlajani G, Agarwal A, Jones S, Zippe C . Long term potency after early use of a vacuum erection device following radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2010; 106: 1719–1722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Defade BP, Carson CC 3rd, Kennelly MJ . Postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction: the role of penile rehabilitation. Rev Urol 2011; 13: 6–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tal R, Teloken P, Mulhall JP . Erectile function rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: practice patterns among AUA members. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 2370–2376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehrfeld T, Lee DI . The role of vacuum erection devices in penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 2009; 21: 158–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cookson MS, Nadig PW . Long term results with vacuum constriction device. J Urol 1993; 149: 290–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Turner LA, Althof SE, Levine SB, Bodner DR, Kurch ED, Resnick MI . External vacuum devices in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a one-year study of sexual and psychosocial impact. J Sex Martial Ther 1991; 17: 81–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Witherington R . Vacuum erection device for the management of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 1989; 141: 320–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zippe CD, Raina R, Thukral M, Lakin MM, Klein EA, Agarwal A . Management of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2001; 2: 495–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Turner LA, Althof SE, Levine SB, Bodner DR, Kurch ED, Resnick MI . Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self injection versus external vacuum devices. Urology 1992; 39: 139–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Turner LA, Althof SE, Levine SB, Tobias TR, Kursh ED, Bodner D et al. Treating erectile dysfunction with external vacuum devices: impact upon sexual, psychological and martial functioning. J Urol 1990; 144: 79–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meuleman EJ, Mulders PF . Erectile function after radical prostatectomy: a review. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 95–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Raina R, Pahlajani G, Agarwal A, Zippe CD . Early penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy: Cleveland Clinic experience. Int J Impot Res 2008; 20: 121–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohler TS, Pedro R, Hendlin K, Utz W, Ugarte R, Reddy P et al. A pilot study on the early use of the vacuum erection device after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2007; 100: 858–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Canguven O, Bailen J, Fredriksson W, Bock D, Burnett AL . Combination of vacuum erection device and PDE5 inhibitors as salvage therapy in PDE5 inhibitor nonresponders with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 2561–2567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan J, Hoang AN, Romero CA, Lin H, Dai Y, Wang R . Vacuum therapy in erectile dysfunction- science and clinical evidence. Int J Impot Res 2010; 22: 211–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alivizatos G, Skolarikos A . Incontinence and erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: a review. ScientificWorldJournal 2005; 5: 747–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raina R, Agarwal A, Ausmundson S, Lakin M, Nandipati KC, Montague DK et al. Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potentially earlier return of erectile function. Int J Impot Res 2006; 18: 77–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Strambi LF, Da Pozzo LF, Nava L, Barbieri L et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernosal injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 1997; 158: 1408–1410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Teloken P, Mesquita G, Montorsi F, Mulhall JP . Post-radical prostatectomy pharmacological penile rehabilitation: practice patterns among the international society for sexual medicine practitioners. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 2032–2038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mulhall JP, Morgentaler A . Penile rehabilitation should become the norm for radical prostatectomy patients. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 538–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Albaugh JA . Addressing and managing erectile dysfunction after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urol Nurs 2010; 30: 166.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mulhall JP, Bella AJ, Briganti A, McCullough A, Brock G . Erectile function rehabilitation in the radical prostatectomy patient. J Sex Med 2010; 7 (Pt 2): 1687–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Antonini G, Busetto GM, De Berardinis E, Giovannone R, Vicini P, Del Giudice F et al. Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications. Int J Impot Res 2016; 28: 4–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

    G J Nason, F McNamara, M Twyford, F O'Kelly, S White, E Dunne, G P Smyth & R E Power

  2. Department of Urology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    F McNamara, G C Durkan & S K Giri

  3. Department of Urology, University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland

    G C Durkan

Authors
  1. G J Nason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F McNamara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M Twyford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F O'Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E Dunne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. G C Durkan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S K Giri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. G P Smyth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. R E Power
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G J Nason.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nason, G., McNamara, F., Twyford, M. et al. Efficacy of vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) after radical prostatectomy: the initial Irish experience of a dedicated VED clinic. Int J Impot Res 28, 205–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2016.23

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2016.23

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links