Abstract
Controversy exists regarding optimal penile rehabilitation program following radical prostatectomy (RP). Vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) have become an important component of penile rehabilitation protocols. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and patient satisfaction of a dedicated VED clinic. A voluntary telephone questionnaire was performed of all patients who attended a VED clinic to date in two university teaching hospitals. Patient demographics, histopathological characteristics and functional status (International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores) were obtained from a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Sixty-five men attended the dedicated VED clinic in the two university teaching hospitals. Forty-men (76.3%) men purchased a VED following the dedicated clinic. There was significant differences noted between the mean preoperative and the 3-month postoperative IIEF scores (22.08±3.16 vs 11.3±3.08, P=0.0001) and between the 3-month postoperative IIEF score and the post-VED use IIEF score (11.3±3.08 vs 16.74±2.62, P=0.0001). Despite VED use, there was a significant reduction in erectile function from presurgery status (22.08±3.16 vs 16.74±2.62, P=0.0001). All patients reported that the dedicated VED was helpful and would recommend it to other patients. Our study demonstrates that, despite a reduction in erectile function after RP, successful erections are attainable with a VED. There is potential and need for the development of a standard penile rehabilitation program and treatment of ED after RP internationally.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 124–137.
Raina R, Pahlajani G, Agarwal A, Jones S, Zippe C . Long term potency after early use of a vacuum erection device following radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2010; 106: 1719–1722.
Defade BP, Carson CC 3rd, Kennelly MJ . Postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction: the role of penile rehabilitation. Rev Urol 2011; 13: 6–13.
Tal R, Teloken P, Mulhall JP . Erectile function rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: practice patterns among AUA members. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 2370–2376.
Lehrfeld T, Lee DI . The role of vacuum erection devices in penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 2009; 21: 158–164.
Cookson MS, Nadig PW . Long term results with vacuum constriction device. J Urol 1993; 149: 290–294.
Turner LA, Althof SE, Levine SB, Bodner DR, Kurch ED, Resnick MI . External vacuum devices in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a one-year study of sexual and psychosocial impact. J Sex Martial Ther 1991; 17: 81–93.
Witherington R . Vacuum erection device for the management of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 1989; 141: 320–322.
Zippe CD, Raina R, Thukral M, Lakin MM, Klein EA, Agarwal A . Management of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2001; 2: 495–503.
Turner LA, Althof SE, Levine SB, Bodner DR, Kurch ED, Resnick MI . Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self injection versus external vacuum devices. Urology 1992; 39: 139–144.
Turner LA, Althof SE, Levine SB, Tobias TR, Kursh ED, Bodner D et al. Treating erectile dysfunction with external vacuum devices: impact upon sexual, psychological and martial functioning. J Urol 1990; 144: 79–82.
Meuleman EJ, Mulders PF . Erectile function after radical prostatectomy: a review. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 95–102.
Raina R, Pahlajani G, Agarwal A, Zippe CD . Early penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy: Cleveland Clinic experience. Int J Impot Res 2008; 20: 121–126.
Kohler TS, Pedro R, Hendlin K, Utz W, Ugarte R, Reddy P et al. A pilot study on the early use of the vacuum erection device after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2007; 100: 858–862.
Canguven O, Bailen J, Fredriksson W, Bock D, Burnett AL . Combination of vacuum erection device and PDE5 inhibitors as salvage therapy in PDE5 inhibitor nonresponders with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 2561–2567.
Yuan J, Hoang AN, Romero CA, Lin H, Dai Y, Wang R . Vacuum therapy in erectile dysfunction- science and clinical evidence. Int J Impot Res 2010; 22: 211–219.
Alivizatos G, Skolarikos A . Incontinence and erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: a review. ScientificWorldJournal 2005; 5: 747–758.
Raina R, Agarwal A, Ausmundson S, Lakin M, Nandipati KC, Montague DK et al. Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potentially earlier return of erectile function. Int J Impot Res 2006; 18: 77–81.
Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Strambi LF, Da Pozzo LF, Nava L, Barbieri L et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernosal injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 1997; 158: 1408–1410.
Teloken P, Mesquita G, Montorsi F, Mulhall JP . Post-radical prostatectomy pharmacological penile rehabilitation: practice patterns among the international society for sexual medicine practitioners. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 2032–2038.
Mulhall JP, Morgentaler A . Penile rehabilitation should become the norm for radical prostatectomy patients. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 538–543.
Albaugh JA . Addressing and managing erectile dysfunction after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urol Nurs 2010; 30: 166.
Mulhall JP, Bella AJ, Briganti A, McCullough A, Brock G . Erectile function rehabilitation in the radical prostatectomy patient. J Sex Med 2010; 7 (Pt 2): 1687–1698.
Antonini G, Busetto GM, De Berardinis E, Giovannone R, Vicini P, Del Giudice F et al. Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications. Int J Impot Res 2016; 28: 4–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nason, G., McNamara, F., Twyford, M. et al. Efficacy of vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) after radical prostatectomy: the initial Irish experience of a dedicated VED clinic. Int J Impot Res 28, 205–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2016.23
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2016.23
This article is cited by
-
Vacuum erection device for erectile function rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: which is the correct schedule? Results from a systematic, scoping review
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)
-
Indications and characteristics of penile traction and vacuum erection devices
Nature Reviews Urology (2022)