Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Results from an online survey investigating ED patients' insights and treatment expectations

Abstract

Data suggest that the currently available therapies for erectile dysfunction (ED) do not meet all the patients' and their partners' expectations. The aim was to assess ED patients' treatment expectations for a variety of sex- and drug-related aspects such as importance of spontaneity, partner satisfaction, ideal onset of action and ideal duration of action. A total of n=1124 men with ED and n=410 healthy men, aged 30–75, participated in this online survey. The ED sample was further divided into patients currently undergoing treatment (CTG), patients who had been undergoing treatment in the past (PTG) and naïve patients (NG). The International Index of Erectile Function as well as a mix of study-specific questions was used. All groups considered ‘maintaining an erection until the partner reaches orgasm’ the most important aspect regarding erectile function. ‘Being able to please the partner’ was considered as the most important aspect for a fulfilled sex life. The majority of men (38.1%) further considered an onset of action of about 15 min to be desirable. In all, 95.9% further considered a duration of action up to 4 h to be desirable whereas approximately 71% of men considered a duration of more than 12 h to be too long. It seems that once the basic functional aspects related to erectile function have been covered, additional benefits such as ‘spontaneity’ and ‘pleasing the partner’ become important and may be critical for choosing the optimum individual treatment, to improve the sexual satisfaction and the adherence to the treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hyde Z, Flicker L, Hankey GJ, Almeida OP, McCaul KA, Chubb SA et al. Prevalence of sexual activity and associated factors in men aged 75 to 95 years: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mykletun A, Dahl AA, O’Leary MP, Fosså SD . Assessment of male sexual function by the Brief Sexual Function Inventory. BJU Int 2006; 97: 316–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber MF, Smith DP, O'Connell DL, Patel MI, de Souza PL, Sitas F et al. Risk factors for erectile dysfunction in a cohort of 108 477 Australian men. Med J Aust 2013; 199: 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Capogrosso P, Colicchia M, Ventimiglia E, Castagna G, Clementi MC, Suardi N et al. One patient out of four with newly diagnosed erectile dysfunction is a young man—worrisome picture from the everyday clinical practice. J Sex Med 2013; 10: 1833–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McCabe MP, Althof SE . A systematic review of the psychosocial outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction: does the impact of erectile dysfunction extend beyond a man’s inability to have sex? J Sex Med 2014; 11: 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiann BP, Su CC, Tsai JY . Is female sexual function related to the male partners’ erectile function? J Sex Med 2013; 10: 420–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sontag A, Ni X, Althof SE, Rosen RC . Relationship between erectile function and sexual self-confidence: a path analytic model in men being treated with tadalafil. Int J Impotence Res 2013; 26: 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindau ST, Schumm LP, Laumann EO, Levinson W, O’Muircheartaigh CA, Waite LJ . A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 762–774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Porst H, Burnett A, Brock G, Ghanem H, Giuliano F, Glina S et al., and the ISSM Standards Committee for Sexual Medicine. SOP conservative (medical and mechanical) treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2013; 10: 130–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatzimouratidis K, Amar E, Eardley I, Giuliano F, Hatzichristou D, Montorsi F et al.; European Association of Urology. Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 804–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eardley I, Donatucci C, Corbin J, El-Meliegy A, Hatzimouratidis K, McVary K et al. Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 524–540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruzziches R, Francomano D, Gareri P, Lenzi A, Aversa A . An update on pharmacological treatment of erectile dysfunction with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2013; 14: 1333–1344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiann BP, Yu CC, Su CC, Tsai JY . Compliance of Sildenafil treatment for erectile dysfunction and factors affecting it. Int J Impot Res 2006; 18: 146–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Perimenis P, Roumeguere T, Heidler H, Roos E, Belger M, Schmitt H . Evaluation of patient expectations and treatment satisfaction after 1-year tadalafil therapy for erectile dysfunction: the DETECT study. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosen RC, Cappeleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM . Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 319–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher WA, Rosen RC, Eardley I, Sand M, Goldstein I . Sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: the Female Experience of Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (FEMALES) study. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 675–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Festinger L . A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press: California, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Festinger L . Cognitive dissonance. Sci Am 1962; 207: 93–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Toluna Group for the implementation of the online survey and A Menarini Farmaceutica Internazionale as sponsor of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Burri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

AB investigator, speaker and Advisory Board Member for Menarini; HP investigator, speaker and consultant for Eli Lilly, Menarini/Berlin Chemie and Auxilium.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burri, A., Porst, H. Results from an online survey investigating ED patients' insights and treatment expectations. Int J Impot Res 27, 191–196 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2015.14

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2015.14

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links