Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The sexual attraction toward disabilities: a preliminary internet-based study


Devotism, defined as sexual attraction toward disabilities, has not undergone extensive study. To verify whether devotees have characteristics suggestive of a paraphilic behavior, an ad hoc internet questionnaire was developed to study a population of 209 subjects enrolled from online devotee communities. With respect to the sexual preference, we observe a first population comprising subjects sexually attracted by disability per se and considers it as an erotic object. In the absence of disability, this group is also unable to become sexually aroused and experiences discomfort due to their condition. The second subpopulation comprises subjects attracted by specific characteristics of people with disabilities such as adaptability, fortitude, courage and ability to overcome obstacles. This group experiences low levels of discomfort for their sexual preference. Further studies will be necessary to confirm these data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Aguilera RJ . Disability and delight: staring back at the Devotee community. Sexuality Dis 2000; 18: 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruno R . Devotees, pretenders and wannabes: two cases of factitous disability disorder. Sexuality Dis 1997; 15: 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Money J, Simcoe KW . Acrotomophilia, sex and disability: new concepts and case report. Sexuality Dis. 1986; 7: 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan C . Out on a limb: The ethical management of Body Integrity Identity Disorder. Neuroethics 2009; 2: 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowenstein L . Fetishes and their associated behavior. Sexuality Dis 2002; 20: 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor B . Amputee fetishism: an exclusive journal interview with Dr. John Money of Johns Hopkins. Maryland State Med J 1976; 4: 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baumeister R, Butler JL . Sexual masochism: Deviance without pathology. In: Handbook of Sexual Deviance. O’Donohue EDRLW. Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997 pp 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quinsey V . The etiology of anomalous sexual preference in men. Annals of N Y Acad Sci 2003; 989: 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Langstrom N, Hanson RK . High rates of sexual behavior in the general population: correlates and predictors. Arch sexual behav 2006; 35: 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Money J . History, causality, and sexology. J Sex Res. 2003; 40: 237–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon D . An erotic attraction to amputees. Sexuality Dis 1983; 6: 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Money J . The Adam Principle. Prometheus Books,: Buffalo,NY,USA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Riddle G . Amputees and Devotees. Irvington: New York, NY, USA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wakefield P, Frank A, Meyers RW . The hobbyist: a euphemism for self-mutilation and fetishism. Bull Menninger Clin 1977; 41: 539–552.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Everaerd W . A case of apotemnophilia. A handicap as sexual preference. Am J Psychother 1983; 37: 285–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips K . Understanding Body Dysmorphic Disorder: An Essential Guide. Oxford university press: New York, NY, USA, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bayne T, Levy N . Amputees by choice: Body Integrity Identity Disorder and the ethics of amputation. J Appl Philos 2005; 22: 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. First M . Desire for amputation of a limb: Paraphilia, psychosis, or a new type of identity disorder. Psychol Med 2005; 35: 919–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawrence A . Clinical and theoretical parallels between desire for limb amputation and gender identity disorder. Arch sexual behav 2006; 35: 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Solvang P . The amputee body desired: beauty destabilized? disability re-valued? Sexuality Dis 2007; 25: 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Money J, Jobaris R, Furth G . Apotemnophilia: Two cases of self-demand amputation as a paraphilia. J Sex Res. 1977; 13: 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Money J . Paraphilia in Females Fixation on Amputation and Lameness; Two Personal Accounts. J Psychol Human Sex 1990; 3: 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jannini E, Scorolli C, Ghirlanda S, Enquist M . Relative prevalence of different fetishes. Int J Impot Res. 2007; 19: 432–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kinsey A, Alfred C . Sexual Behav Human Male. Bloomington Indiana University Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  25. First M . DSM-5 Proposals for Paraphilias: Suggestions for Reducing False Positives Related to Use of Behavioral Manifestations. Arch sexual behav 2010; 39: 1239–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Krueger RB, Kaplan MS . Paraphilic Diagnoses in DSM-5. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 2012; 49: 248–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fedoroff JP . Forensic and diagnostic concerns arising from the proposed DSM-5 criteria for sexual paraphilic disorder. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2011; 39: 238–241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wakefield JC . DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility. Int J Law Psychiatry, 2011 May-Jun 34: 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSMIV-TR).. Arlington, VA, USA, 2000.

  30. Blanchard R . A brief history of field trials of the DSM diagnostic criteria for paraphilias. Arch of sexual behav 2011; 40: 861–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moser C, Kleinplatz PJ . DSM-IV-TR and the paraphilias: An argument for removal. J Psychol Human Sex 2005; 17: 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gosling SD, Vazire S, Srivastava S, John OP . Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. The American psychologist 2004; 59: 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Enquist M, Aronsson H, Ghirlanda S, Jansson L, Jannini EA . Exposure to mother’s pregnancy and lactation in infancy is associated with sexual attraction to pregnancy and lactation in adulthood. J sexual med 2011; 8: 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work had not received support in the form of grants and/or equipment and drugs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to E A Jannini.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on International Journal of Impotence Research website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Limoncin, E., Carta, R., Gravina, G. et al. The sexual attraction toward disabilities: a preliminary internet-based study. Int J Impot Res 26, 51–54 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


This article is cited by


Quick links