Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

How curved is too curved? The severity of penile deformity may predict sexual disability among men with Peyronie’s disease

Abstract

Peyronie’s disease (PD) is caused by progressive fibrotic scarring of the tunica albuginea resulting in curvature or other deformities of the erect penis. The severity of penile curvature or other deformity may contribute to a man’s inability to have intercourse (sexual disability), due to difficulty with penetration, partner pain or emotional stress. To determine whether the degree of curvature or type of penile deformity predicts sexual disability among men with PD. This cross-sectional analysis of consecutive men evaluated for PD at a single tertiary referral center used a PD-specific questionnaire to evaluate risk factors for sexual disability in men with PD, who did not have erectile dysfunction (ED). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the clinical predictors of sexual disability. Sexual disability as defined by the inability to have penetrative intercourse. A total of 202 men were evaluated and 88 men with ED were excluded. Sexual disability was associated with relationship problems, penile curvature and penile length loss in bivariate, but not multivariate analysis. We found that although many of the demographic, medical and sexual function domains were significant predictors of inability to have sex, the only significant predictor of sexual disability in multivariate analysis was curvature>60° (odds ratio 3.23 95%CI 1.08–9.67). PD can be sexually disabling in many men without ED. Severe penile curvature is a robust independent predictor of the ability to have intercourse. Other penile deformities fail to predict sexual disability. This is important for counseling patients with newly diagnosed PD and those who are considering medical or surgical intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pryor J, Akkus E, Alter G, Jordan G, Lebret T, Levine L et al. Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 2004; 1: 110–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. La Pera G, Pescatori ES, Calabrese M, Boffini A, Colombo F, Andriani E et al. Peyronie’s disease: prevalence and association with cigarette smoking. A multicenter population-based study in men aged 50-69 years. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 525–530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jarow JP, Lowe FC . Penile trauma: an etiologic factor in Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction. J Urol 1997; 158: 1388–1390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mulhall JP, Creech SD, Boorjian SA, Ghaly S, Kim ED, Moty A et al. Subjective and objective analysis of the prevalence of Peyronie’s disease in a population of men presenting for prostate cancer screening. J Urol 2004; 171: 2350–2353.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mulhall JP . Expanding the paradigm for plaque development in Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: S93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kadioglu A, Oktar T, Kandirali E, Kendirci M, Sanli O, Ozsoy C . Incidentally diagnosed Peyronie’s disease in men presenting with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 2004; 16: 540–543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tunuguntla HS . Management of Peyronie’s disease—a review. World J Urol 2001; 19: 244–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kendirci M, Trost L, Sikka SC, Hellstrom WJ . Diabetes mellitus is associated with severe Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int 2007; 99: 383–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deveci S, Hopps CV, O'Brien K, Parker M, Guhring P, Mulhall JP . Defining the clinical characteristics of Peyronie’s disease in young men. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 485–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Conti SL, Turek P, Lue T . Risk factors for emotional and relationship problems in Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 2179–2184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Lue TF . Peyronie’s disease: a critical appraisal of current diagnosis and treatment. Int J Impot Res 2008; 20: 445–459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Muller A, Mulhall JP . Peyronie’s disease intervention trials: methodological challenges and issues. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 848–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson CJ, Diblasio C, Kendirci M, Hellstrom W, Guhring P, Mulhall JP . The chronology of depression and distress in men with Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 1985–1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelami A . Classification of congenital and acquired penile deviation. Urol Int 1983; 38: 229–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Perimenis P, Athanasopoulos A, Gyftopoulos K, Katsenis G, Barbalias G . Peyronie’s disease: epidemiology and clinical presentation of 134 cases. Int Urol Nephrol 2001; 32: 691–694.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tefekli A, Kandirali E, Erol B, Tunc M, Kadioglu A . Peyronie’s disease: a silent consequence of diabetes mellitus. Asian J Androl 2006; 8: 75–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kendirci M, Nowfar S, Gur S, Jabren GW, Sikka SC, Hellstrom WJ . The relationship between the type of penile abnormality and penile vascular status in patients with peyronie's disease. J Urol 2005; 174: 632–635, discussion 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kadioglu A, Tefekli A, Erol B, Oktar T, Tunc M, Tellaloglu S . A retrospective review of 307 men with Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2002; 168: 1075–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saigal CS, Wessells H, Pace J, Schonlau M, Wilt TJ . Predictors and prevalence of erectile dysfunction in a racially diverse population. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 207–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hellstrom WJ, Bivalacqua TJ . Peyronie’s disease: etiology, medical, and surgical therapy. J Androl 2000; 21: 347–354.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T J Walsh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walsh, T., Hotaling, J., Lue, T. et al. How curved is too curved? The severity of penile deformity may predict sexual disability among men with Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res 25, 109–112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2012.48

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2012.48

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links