Original Article | Published:

Abnormal endothelial function in ED patients with normal nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity: is it the role of psychogenic factors?

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 24, pages 247250 (2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

Underlying endothelial dysfunction (EnD) may present in the early stage of ED or psychogenic ED. We retrospectively evaluated 191 ED patients with effective nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) recording, including detailed medical and psychosexual history, International Index of Erectile Function-5 and vascular parameter. All patients were allocated into psychogenic and organic groups according to the NPTR test. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was used to diagnose EnD, and ED patients were classified into two groups: non-EnD (FMD10) and EnD (FMD<10). General and vascular parameters were compared between psychogenic and organic groups, and non-EnD and EnD groups with ED were compared in terms of NPTR parameters. In all, 48.7% and 51.3% patients were diagnosed as psychogenic and organic ED, respectively. 73.1% of the psychogenic patients had EnD and 39.8% organic patients had normal endothelial function. In all parameters, only the FMD value showed significant difference between psychogenic and organic ED groups (8.26±2.57 vs 9.16±2.76, P=0.020). No statistical difference was founded in NPTR parameters between non-EnD and EnD groups (P>0.05). In conclusion, NPTR cannot effectively identify the underlying vasculogenic ED from psychogenic ED. Psychogenic causes may cause or aggravate EnD in these ED patients with normal NPTR.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , , , et al. British society for sexual medicine guidelines on the management of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 1841–1865.

  2. 2.

    , , , , . Nocturnal penile erections: the diagnostic value of tumescence and rigidity activity units. Int J Impot Res 2009; 21: 376–381.

  3. 3.

    , , . Some characteristics of nocturnal penile tumescence in elderly males. J Gerontol 1972; 27: 39–45.

  4. 4.

    , , , , , . Evaluation of nocturnal penile tumescence in the differential diagnosis of sexual impotence: A quantitative study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979; 36: 431–437.

  5. 5.

    , , , . New method for continuous measurement of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity. Urology 1985; 26: 4–9.

  6. 6.

    , , , . Diagnostic tests for male erectile dysfunction revisited. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 2375–2381.

  7. 7.

    , , , , , et al. Glycosylated serum protein may improve our ability to predict endothelial and erectile dysfunction in nonorganic patients. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 840–850.

  8. 8.

    , , , , , . Penile and systemic endothelial function in men with and without erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 979–985.

  9. 9.

    , , . Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance. Circulation 2007; 115: 1285–1295.

  10. 10.

    , , , . Assessment of flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery: effects of technical aspects of the FMD measurement on the FMD response. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 363–368.

  11. 11.

    , , , . Flow-mediated vasodilation*. Chest 2005; 127: 2254–2263.

  12. 12.

    , . Use of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity in the evaluation of male erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am 1995; 22: 775–788.

  13. 13.

    , , , . Effect of aging on quality of nocturnal erections: evaluation with NPTR testing. Int J Impot Res 2004; 16: 150–153.

  14. 14.

    , . The neurophysiology of sexual arousal. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 21: 445–461.

  15. 15.

    , , . Physiology of penile erection and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. Color Doppler US of the Penis 2008; Chapter 3: 15–20.

  16. 16.

    , . The role of penile color-duplex ultrasound for the evaluation of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 1437–1447.

  17. 17.

    . Diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. Stand Pract Sex Med 2006; Chapter 6: 59–74.

  18. 18.

    , , , . Use and abuse of Rigiscan in the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. The Journal of Sex Med 2009; 6: 1820–1829.

  19. 19.

    , . The endothelial–erectile dysfunction connection: an essential update. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 2390–2404.

  20. 20.

    , , , , , et al. Correlation between flow-mediated dilation and erectile dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2008; 51: 148–153.

  21. 21.

    , , . Erectile dysfunction as a sentinel marker of endothelial dysfunction. Singapore Med J 2009; 50: 698–701.

  22. 22.

    , , , , , . Endothelial dysfunction and erectile dysfunction in the aging man. Int J Urol 2010; 17: 38–47.

  23. 23.

    , , , , , et al. Endothelial function predicts progression of carotid intima-media thickness. Circulation 2009; 119: 1005–1012.

  24. 24.

    , , , , , et al. Clinical and metabolic evaluation of subjects with erectile dysfunction: a review with a proposal flowchart. Int J Androl 2009; 32: 198–211.

  25. 25.

    , , . New concept parameters of RigiScan in differentiation of vascular erectile dysfunction: Is it a useful test? Int J Urol 2001; 8: 686–691.

  26. 26.

    , , , , . Controversies in sexual medicine: organic vs psychogenic? The Manichean diagnosis in sexual medicine. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 1726–1733.

  27. 27.

    . Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular risk–current opinion. Atherosclerosis 2012; 13: 14.

  28. 28.

    , . How mental stress affects endothelial function. Pflügers Arch 2011; 462: 779–794.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Yuan-yuan Zhang and Ching-Shwun Lin for the great efforts on revising the manuscript. This study was supported by the grant of National Natural Science Foundation of China (30872571, 81070488, Professor Deng received a grant from NSFC; 30901487, Professor Sun received a grant from NSFC), Guangdong Natural Science Fund (07001628, 10251008901000005, Professor Deng received a grant from GDNSFC; 8451008901000774, Professor Sun received a grant from GDNSFC; 10151008901000222, Dr Deng received a grant from GDNSFC); Guangdong Province Science and Technology Project (2011B031800115, Professor Deng received a grant from GDSTC; 2008B080703056, Professor Liu received a grant from GDSTC; 2009B030801178, Dr Deng received a grant from GDSTC) the grant of Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20100171110060, Professor Deng received a grant from RFDP).

Author information

Author notes

    • Y-P Huang
    • , Y-D Zhang
    •  & Y Gao

    Drs Y-P Huang, Y-D Zhang and Y Gao contributed equally to this article.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

    • Y-P Huang
    • , Y-D Zhang
    • , Y Gao
    • , X Chen
    • , Y-L Ye
    • , B Ouyang
    • , S-F Chen
    • , X-X Yuan
    • , Y-P Dai
    • , X-Z Sun
    •  & C-H Deng
  2. Department of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

    • F-J Yao
  3. Department of Health Examination Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

    • Y Wang
    •  & W Ran

Authors

  1. Search for Y-P Huang in:

  2. Search for Y-D Zhang in:

  3. Search for Y Gao in:

  4. Search for F-J Yao in:

  5. Search for Y Wang in:

  6. Search for X Chen in:

  7. Search for Y-L Ye in:

  8. Search for B Ouyang in:

  9. Search for S-F Chen in:

  10. Search for X-X Yuan in:

  11. Search for W Ran in:

  12. Search for Y-P Dai in:

  13. Search for X-Z Sun in:

  14. Search for C-H Deng in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to X-Z Sun or C-H Deng.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2012.26