Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Brain potentials related to corpus cavernosum electromyography


The aim of this study was to elucidate the relation between electrical activity in the corpus cavernosum (CC), penile responses and brain processes. EEG potentials, penile circumference and electrical activity of the CC (CC-EMG) were recorded simultaneously while male subjects were exposed to visual sexual stimuli. The trials were sorted by the penile response of the subjects (erection, maintenance or detumescence). The corresponding EEG recordings were subjected to independent component analysis (ICA) and then correlated with CC activity. We found that CC activity was decreased in the case of erection. EEG activity was found to be correlated with CC activity in most cases at the same instant or with subsequent CC activity. EEG activity at early time points after stimulus onset (<300 ms) was found to be correlated with CC activity, indicating penile response preparation at a pre-attentive processing level. These data indicate that (i) CC activity is under the control of brain processing and (ii) autonomous input reaches the CC in fractions of a second after sexual stimulus onset. Our experimental paradigm should be used for the study of psychogenic erectile dysfunctions and could help in the development of an objective measurement of this disturbance

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6


  1. Wagner G, Gerstenberg T, Levin RJ . Electrical activity of corpus cavernosum during flaccidity and erection of the human penis: a new diagnostic method? J Urol 1989; 142: 723–725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang X, Meuleman EJ, Wijkstra H, Wagner G . Corpus cavernosum electromyography during morning naps in healthy volunteers: further evidence that corpus cavernosum potentials reflect sympathetically mediated activity. J Urol 2005; 174: 1917–1920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang X, Wijkstra H, Meuleman E, Wagner G . Corpus cavernosum electromyography during sleep-related and audiovisual sexual stimulation induced erection. Eur Urol Suppl 2004; 3: 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Merckx L, Gerstenberg TC, Da Silva JP, Portner M, Stief CC . A consensus on the normal characteristics of corpus cavernosum EMG. Int J Impot Res 1996; 8: 75–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stief CG, Djamilian M, Anton P, de Riese W, Allhoff EP, Jonas U . Single potential analysis of cavernous electrical activity in impotent patients: a possible diagnostic method for autonomic cavernous dysfunction and cavernous smooth muscle degeneration. J Urol 1991; 146: 771–776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stief CG, Thon WF, Djamilian M, de Riese W, Fritz KW, Allhoff EP et al. Single potential analysis of cavernous electrical activity. Urol Res 1991; 19: 277–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ponseti J, Kropp P, Bosinski HA . Brain potentials related to the human penile erection. Int J Impot Res 2009; 21: 292–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang XG, Wijkstra H, Meuleman EJ, Wagner G . The methodology of corpus cavernosum electromyography revisited. Eur Urol 2004; 46: 370–375; discussion 375–376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Makeig S, Delorme A, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Townsend J, Courchesne E et al. Electroencephalographic brain dynamics following manually responded visual targets. PLoS Biol 2004; 2: e176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moores KA, Clark CR, Hadfield JL, Brown GC, Taylor DJ, Fitzgibbon SP et al. Investigating the generators of the scalp recorded visuo-verbal P300 using cortically constrained source localization. Hum Brain Mapp 2003; 18: 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai AC, Liou M, Jung TP, Onton JA, Cheng PE, Huang CC et al. Mapping single-trial EEG records on the cortical surface through a spatiotemporal modality. Neuroimage 2006; 32: 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Delorme A, Makeig S . EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004; 134: 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giuliano F, Rampin O . Central noradrenergic control of penile erection. Int J Impot Res 2000; 12 (S1): S13–S19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Temel Y, Hafizi S, Tan S, Visser-Vandewalle V . Role of the brain in the control of erection. Asian J Androl 2006; 8: 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giuliano F, Rampin O . Neural control of erection. Physiol Behav 2004; 83: 189–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meuleman E, Jiang X, Holsheimer J, Wagner G, Knipscheer B, Wijkstra H . Corpus cavernosum electromyography with revised methodology: an explorative study in patients with erectile dysfunction and men with reported normal erectile function. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Ponseti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ponseti, J., Bosinski, H. Brain potentials related to corpus cavernosum electromyography. Int J Impot Res 22, 171–178 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


This article is cited by


Quick links