We evaluated the effects of body weight (BW) loss on blood pressure (BP) in overweight non-obese patients with stage 1 hypertension. We enrolled 376 overweight (body mass index (BMI) 25 and <30 kg m−2) stage 1 hypertensive patients in this prospective 12-month trial. Each patient received tailored, low caloric dietary advice. After 6 months, patients with a BW reduction <5% were excluded. Body weight, BMI, BP, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), leptin (pL), renin and aldosterone levels were evaluated at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. In 222 patients who completed the study, a mean weight reduction of 8.1 kg reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 4.2 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 3.3 mm Hg (P<0.05), which was accompanied by a significant decrease in FPI, pL and aldosterone levels (P<0.05). Larger SBP/DBP reductions were observed in 106 patients with normalized BMI (−5/−4.5 mm Hg, P<0.01) compared with the 116 patients who did not become normalized (−3.3/−1.6 mm Hg). The former also presented with greater decreases in FPG, FPI, pL, renin and aldosterone levels. Of the 106 patients who had normalized BMI, 52 also had normalized BP. Clinical and metabolic characteristics of these patients were similar to those of the 56 patients who did not have normalized BP. In overweight, mild hypertensive patients, weight loss was effective in reducing BP and in reversing some endocrinologic alterations associated with being overweight. Half of the patients who had normalized BMI also had normalized BP, which could indicate that these patients essentially did not have a form of hypertension but that these effects were instead secondary to being overweight.
Excessive body weight (BW), in particular abdominal obesity, increases the risk for cardiovascular disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, lipoprotein disorders, osteoarthritis, certain types of cancers and total mortality.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 An escalating epidemic of overweight (body mass index (BMI) 25 and <30 kg m−2) and obesity (BMI >30 kg m−2), is affecting both industrialized and many developing countries in the world, and constitutes a major public health problem.4, 6, 7 In particular, in the United States, the prevalence of obesity was estimated at 32% of the population. Being overweight was even more prevalent, representing 42% of men and 28% of women, of whom 34 and 39%, respectively, had high blood pressure (BP).8, 9 The coexistence of hypertension and excessive BW greatly enhances cardiovascular risk.2, 10 Recent recommendations suggest the use of stratification tables to calculate the percentage of increased cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension and excess BW or obesity.11 The mechanisms underlying hypertension in subjects with excessive BW remain to be elucidated; however, insulin resistance, sodium and fluid retention, adipocyte-mediated effects on angiotensin II, atrial natriuretic peptide levels and leptin-mediated enhancement of sympathetic activity may all have a role.12, 13, 14 The progression and persistence of obesity have been associated with a progressive alteration of the function and the structure of the vascular wall, including chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, alteration of vascular tone and reactivity, proliferation of smooth muscle cells, neo-angiogenesis and altered patterns of blood flow regulation with both hypertensive and arteriosclerotic consequences.15, 16, 17 Some of the metabolic, endocrinologic and hemodynamic changes associated with obesity and hypertension are partially reversed by BW reduction, which decreases BP in overweight non-obese hypertensive patients. Numerous trials of hypertension treatment have shown that weight loss, whether alone or in combination with antihypertensive drugs, has a beneficial effect on BP control.18, 19, 20, 21 Sharma et al.22 confirmed that BW loss is associated with significant reductions in BP and heart rate and may therefore have a role in the management of hypertension in overweight and obese patients. Some clinical studies have indicated that weight loss among overweight and obese subjects can reduce the risk of hypertension.23, 24, 25, 26 Conversely, Winnicki et al.27 showed that in stage 1 hypertensives followed for more than 6 years, the dose–response relationship between BW loss and decrease in BP was not linear, irrespective of initial BW. Body weight loss >13% of the initial weight did not elicit an additional BP decrease. Data on the antihypertensive efficacy of BW loss, specifically in overweight non-obese patients with untreated hypertension, however, are scarce. This population deserves special interest because (a) overweight is more prevalent than obesity,4, 8, 9 (b) overweight patients are more likely, than obese patients, to achieve and maintain BW reduction/normalization, and (c) overweight patients are less likely to present the structural alterations of the vascular wall that are commonly associated with the progression and persistence of obesity and may sustain elevated BP values.15, 16, 17 Given this background, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a 12-month dietary intervention, aimed at BW loss, on BP levels in overweight non-obese adults with never-treated stage 1 hypertension. Changes in some metabolic and endocrine parameters that are usually altered in obesity-related hypertension were also assessed.
Materials and methods
This was a prospective, open label, 12-month trial. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Pavia and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments.
Caucasian overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg m−2), outpatients, males and females, aged 40–65 years, with never-treated stage 1 hypertension (systolic BP (SBP) 140 and <160 mm Hg and/or diastolic (DBP) 90 and <100 mm Hg)28 were evaluated. Patients were excluded if they had a history of BW change >3 kg within the previous 3 months, diabetes mellitus, secondary hypertension, myocardial infarction or stroke in the preceding 6 months, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, significant thyroid, pulmonary, renal or hepatic disease, gastrointestinal disorders, pregnancy or nursing, significant neurological or psychiatric disturbances (including alcohol or drug abuse) or use of anorexiant agents, laxatives, cyproheptadine, antidepressants, antiserotoninergics, phenothiazines, barbiturates, oral corticosteroids, antipsychotics or hormone replacement therapies. All patients provided written informed consent to participate.
All subjects received dietary advice from a registered dietician. The dietary advice was tailored to each patient on the basis of 3-day food records. The recommended composition of the dietary regimen was as follows: carbohydrates, 50–60%; proteins, 15–20%; total fat, less than 30%; saturated fats, less than 10%; and cholesterol consumption, less than 300 mg per day. Moreover, patients were advised to consume at least 250–300 g of fruits, 125–150 g of vegetables and 25–50 g of walnuts per day; they were also encouraged to consume 400 g of whole grains (legumes, rice, maize and wheat) daily and to increase their consumption of olive oil. The energy content of the diet was calculated from the patient's estimated basal metabolic rate multiplied by 1.3 to estimate the total daily energy expenditure for subjects with mild to moderate daily activity. From this, 600 kcal per day was subtracted to give a mildly hypocaloric diet. The minimum caloric intake to be prescribed was 1200 kcal per day.29
Compliance with the program was assessed by the attendance at meetings and evaluation of diet diaries. Patients consuming the control diet were given oral and written information about healthy food choices at baseline and at subsequent visits. Patients were followed up for 12 months and had monthly sessions with the dietitian and/or specialist physician during the study. Once a month, dietitians and/or specialists provided instructions on correct dietary intake-recording procedures as part of a behavior modification program and also used the patient food diaries for counseling.
To achieve a high external validity of the study, the nutritional therapy did not include any supplements or free-delivered food items, and subjects had to adopt the recommended diet strictly by themselves after intensive education.
After 2 months, patients who did not achieve a normal BMI (<25 kg m−2) and achieved a weight decrease <2% were excluded, whereas patients who achieved a weight decrease between 2 and 5% started treatment with orlistat, 120 mg once daily, at dinner. After 4 months, patients who did not achieve a weight loss 5% and did not achieve a normal BMI doubled the orlistat dose (120 mg at lunch and 120 mg at dinner). After 6 months, patients who achieved a weight loss <5% without achieving a normal BMI were excluded.
We chose to administer orlistat because our previous study30 showed that orlistat was effective on anthropometric variables, such as BW and BMI, and that it was associated with a mild reduction in BP values; we also reported that orlistat and fluvastatin or orlistat and simvastatin seemed to have a synergistic effect on improving the lipid profile when used as combination therapy.31, 32 There is also evidence that orlistat seems to be slightly more efficacious as an anti-obesity drug compared with sibutramine.33 A combination of orlistat and ezetimibe had more favorable effects on low-density lipoproteins (LDL-C) and small, dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL-C) levels in overweight and obese hypercholesterolemic patients than either drug alone. Furthermore, orlistat, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, improved several anthropometric and metabolic variables.34
Efficacy and compliance assessment
Before starting the study, all patients underwent an initial screening visit that included a medical history, physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and measurements of height, BW, abdominal circumference, BMI, FPG, FPI, SBP, DBP, heart rate (HR), pL, renin and aldosterone levels. Body mass index, FPG, FPI, pL, renin and aldosterone levels were also assessed at 6 and 12 months. All plasmatic variables were determined after a 12-h overnight fast. Venous blood samples were drawn by a research nurse for all patients between 0800 and 0900 hours. We used plasma obtained by addition of Na2-EDTA (1 mg ml−1) and centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. Immediately after centrifugation, the plasma samples were frozen and stored at −80 °C for 3 months. All measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Body mass index was calculated by the investigators as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. A biologist was responsible for the assays performed in the laboratory.
Plasma glucose was assayed using a glucose-oxidase method (GOD/PAP, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) with intra- and inter-assay CsV <2% (European Diabetes Policy). Plasma insulin was assessed with Philadiaseph Insulin Radioimmunoassay (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) using a second antibody to separate the free and antibody-bound 125 I-insulin (intra- and inter-assay CsV, 4.6 and 7.3%, respectively).35
Plasma leptin concentrations were assessed in duplicate using commercially available ELISA kits (TiterZyme EIA Kit, Assay Designs, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The intra- and inter-assay CsV was 4.5 and 6.5%, respectively.36
Blood pressure measurements were obtained for each patient (right arm) in the seated position using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer (Korotkoff I and V; Erkameter 3000, ERKA, Bad Tolz, Germany) with a cuff of appropriate size. Measurements were always performed by the same investigator in the morning and after the subject had rested for 10 min in a quiet room. Three successive BP readings were obtained at 1-min intervals and averaged. Blood pressure recordings were performed by physicians not participating in the study to preserve study blindness of the experimenters. Heart rate was measured by pulse palpation over a 30-s period. To evaluate the tolerability assessment, all adverse events were recorded.
All data are presented as mean±s.d. A paired t-test was used to assess the changes in variables from baseline. Regression analysis of changes in BP parameters as a function of BMI reduction was used to determine whether SBP and/or DBP changes were related to the extent of BW loss. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed using StatView 5.1 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA).
A total of 395 patients were screened for eligibility; 376 fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were enrolled. Of these patients, 222 (59%) completed the study. A total of 154 discontinued the study, 139 (37%) due to insufficient BW reduction and 15 for other reasons. Table 1 shows the clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population at baseline. No major differences were detected between the patients who completed the study and those who dropped-out due to insufficient BW reduction.
The effects of BW loss on the hemodynamic, metabolic and endocrine characteristics of the patients who completed the study are presented in Table 2. Over the 12-month period during which the trial was conducted, BW decreased by a mean of 8.1 kg (−10%, P<0.01 vs. baseline), BMI decreased by 2.8 kg m−2 (−10.1%, P<0.01 vs. baseline), and abdominal circumference decreased by 3.5 cm (−3.6%, P<0.05 vs. baseline). The corresponding reduction in SBP was −4.2 mm Hg (−2.8%, P<0.01 vs. baseline), whereas the mean decrease in DBP was −3.3 mm Hg (−3.5%, P<0.01 vs. baseline). Significant reductions in FPI (−1 U ml−1, −11.7%), pL (−7 ng ml−1, −26.3%) and aldosterone levels (−5 ng l−1, −10.4%) were also observed (all P< 0.05 vs. baseline).
Of the 222 patients who completed the study, 106 (47%) achieved a normal BMI (BMI <25). Although the remaining 116 patients significantly reduced their BMI, it did not reach normal levels. Table 3 shows the effects of BW loss on the hemodynamic, metabolic and endocrine characteristics of the patients who completed the study according to the results obtained (that is, if they were able to normalize BMI). Aside from the greater reduction in BW (−11.9 vs. −7.9%), BMI (−12.9 vs. −7.6%) and abdominal circumference (−4.1 vs. 2.9%), larger BP reductions were observed in patients who achieved normal BMI than in those who did not in both SBP (−5 mm Hg, −3.4% vs. −3.3 mm Hg, −2.2%) and DBP (−4.5 mm Hg, −4.7% vs. −1.6 mm Hg, −1.6%). Subjects who normalized their BMI also presented a greater decrease in FPG (−3.1 vs. −1.5), FPI (−19.7 vs. −5.9%), plasma renin (−14.8 vs. −6.5%), plasma aldosterone (−13.5 vs. −8.3%) and pL (−29.9 vs. −22.2%) levels.
Of the 106 patients who normalized their BMI, 52 also achieved normal BP levels (<140/90 mm Hg), whereas 54 did not reach normal BP values. Table 4 shows the effect of weight loss on the hemodynamic, metabolic and endocrine characteristics of the patients who normalized their BMI as a function of whether they normalized their BP levels. With the expected exception of SBP and DBP values, no significant difference was found between the two groups for the other parameters, including BW, FPI, pL, renin and aldosterone levels.
Figure 1 shows the relationship between BMI and DBP reduction in patients who achieved normal BP levels compared with those who did not. In both groups, a highly significant positive correlation was found between BMI and DBP decrease, although at varying strengths.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a 12-month dietary intervention focusing on BW loss, on BP levels in overweight, non-obese adults with never-treated, stage 1 hypertension. Of the 376 patients enrolled, 139 (37%) were disqualified due to insufficient BW decrease. Their demographic, clinical, metabolic and endocrine characteristics were quite similar to those of patients who completed the study, indicating that the inability to follow the diet was the main factor responsible for the insufficient weight reduction. This confirms that weight loss is difficult to achieve and sustain, and long-term maintenance of adequate weight loss is achieved only in a proportion of overweight patients.26, 37
In the patients who completed the study, a mean weight loss of 8.1 kg (P<0.01 vs. baseline), along with a BMI reduction of 10% and an abdominal circumference decrease of 3.6%, produced a reduction of 4.2 mm Hg in SBP (−2.8%, P<0.01 vs. baseline) and of 3.3 mm Hg in DBP (−3%, P<0.01 vs. baseline). Systolic and diastolic reductions in blood pressure were −0.52 and −0.41 mm Hg, respectively, when expressed per kilogram of weight loss. These reductions were similar to those observed by other authors,38, 39, 40, 41 although lower than those reported by some meta-analyses.42, 43, 44 This might reflect differences in the study design and population. An element of novelty of our study was represented by the results regarding patients who were able to normalize their BMI, because, to our knowledge, no other study has specifically evaluated the effects of BW normalization in overweight non-obese hypertensive patients. In this study, patients who normalized their BMI (47% of the patients who completed the study) had greater SBP and an even greater decrease in DBP (−5/−4.5 mm Hg) compared with those who, although significantly lowering their BW, did not normalize their BMI (−3.3/−1.6 mm Hg for SBP/DBP). In these patients, failure to normalize their BMI was exclusively due to less rigorous adherence to the diet, as no difference in age, gender or other baseline characteristics was found between the groups.
In this study, BW reduction, besides lowering BP levels, was accompanied by a significant decrease in plasma insulin (−11.7%), aldosterone (−10.4%) and leptin levels (−26.3%). Interestingly, these changes were more significant (−19.7% insulin, −13.5% aldosterone and −29.9% leptin decrease) in patients who normalized their BMI, which also presented a significant reduction in FPG (−3.1%) and renin levels (−14.8%). The decrease in fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels observed in this study suggests an improved insulin sensitivity, which may be partly responsible for the fall in BP observed with weight loss in our overweight non-obese hypertensive patients. It is well known that excess BW is associated with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, which in turn may promote hypertension through multiple mechanisms.45, 46, 47
The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) is overactivated in overweight obese hypertensive subjects, and plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone concentrations are higher than those in lean subjects.48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 Activation of the RAAS increases sodium retention and peripheral resistance, thereby contributing to obesity hypertension. Locally produced angiotensin II, arising from adipose tissue itself, and adipocyte-derived proteins modulating aldosterone secretion51, 54, 55 may also have a significant etiological role. Body weight reduction has been shown to reduce PRA and aldosterone levels in obese hypertensive subjects, possibly by decreasing sympathetic nerve activity.48, 56, 57, 58 Reduction in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity has been found to accompany caloric restriction in animals and humans,59, 60 as the SNS and renal nerves are major factors in modulating renin release. It is therefore possible that the changes in PRA reflect diminished SNS activity. Consistent with several studies, we found that a reduction in BW was accompanied by a significant reduction in aldosterone levels and, only in patients who normalized their BMI, in plasma renin, which may have contributed to the observed reduction of BP values.
It has become evident that adipose tissue, far from being an inert organ for storing excess calories, synthesizes and secretes a number of metabolically active molecules, including pL, adiponectin, resistin, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, which, besides exerting autocrine effects on the adipose cells, are involved in cardiovascular regulation.15, 16, 17, 61, 62 Among the adipose tissue-derived substances, pL has multiple actions that are potentially relevant not only for the control of body fat but also for physiological and pathophysiological cardio-renal regulation.35, 63 Elevated plasma pL level has been associated with hypertension in both lean and overweight/obese hypertensive patients.64, 65 Leptin is likely to be involved in the pathogenesis of obesity hypertension, because it causes a significant increase in overall SNS activity, exerts a direct effect on the kidneys (resulting in increased sodium reabsorption) and regulates vasodilatation and vasoconstriction involving nitric oxide-dependent and oxide-independent mechanisms.62, 66, 67 In this study, plasma leptin significantly decreased after weight loss in patients with greater weight reduction and normalized BMI, which is consistent with previous observations.68, 69, 70 Such a reduction in pL could have a role in the reducing BP values, which accompanied weight loss. We did not perform a statistical analysis to evaluate the possible relation between decreased leptin levels and insulin improvement observed in patients. This hypothetical relationship may be considered in the context of recent findings that support the direct involvement of hypothalamic leptin and insulin sensitivity in the liver, even if these results come from experimental studies in animals and need further support from studies in humans.71, 72
The observed efficacy of BW loss to significantly lower BP levels and reversing some metabolic and endocrinologic parameters associated with excess BW strengthens the role of dietary intervention aimed at reducing and possibly normalizing BW as a first-line treatment of overweight, non-obese patients with uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension. Such an intervention may be effective in these patients as they are more likely to present functional, reversible vascular alterations, whereas structural, non-reversible alterations develop with the progression and persistence of excess BW.
In this study, of the 106 patients who normalized their BMI, 52 patients (49%) were also able to normalize their BP values. Their demographic and clinic characteristics and their metabolic and endocrine parameters, both at baseline and at the end of the study, were not different from those of patients who failed to normalize their BP, despite similar BW loss. Evaluation of the relationship between BMI and DBP changes showed a strong positive correlation in both groups, although this correlation was different between the groups (Figure 1). That is, for the same degree of BMI reduction there were two degrees of BP decrease, one greater and one lower. The difference in the correlation of BP response and BMI reduction was independent of age, gender and duration of hypertension. These findings raise the provocative question as to whether it is still correct to define ‘essential hypertensives’ as those subjects who normalize their BP by reducing or normalizing their BMI or whether it may be more appropriate to consider that these patients are affected by a form of secondary hypertension that is particularly susceptible to the hemodynamic, metabolic and endocrine effects of excess fat.
The results of this study indicate that in overweight, non-obese patients with stage 1 hypertension (that is, a population in which the weight-related structural alterations of the vascular wall are not yet developed and functional changes are probably still reversible), BW reduction was effective in significantly reducing BP levels and reversing some metabolic and endocrinologic abnormalities associated with excess BW. This was more evident in patients who normalized their BMI and presented with a greater decrease in BP and in plasma insulin, aldosterone, renin and particularly leptin levels. Half of the patients who normalized their BMI also normalized their BP levels, which could be indicative of a form of hypertension strictly secondary to excess fat in these patients.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.