Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Essential Wolbachia

Essential but unhelpful wasp Wolbachia

Kremer et al. describe a strain of the maternally inherited bacterium Wolbachia that induces parthenogenesis in its host, the wasp Asobara japonica; in certain populations females only produce female offspring when they are infected. A related Wolbachia strain in another Asobara wasp species (Asobara tabida) has quite a different effect—this other strain is essential for successful oogenesis but it does not cause parthenogenesis. Two related Wolbachia have, therefore, diverged and become essential for their wasp hosts, but without providing them any fitness benefit.

Wolbachia are well-known bacteria that live inside the reproductive tissue and other tissues of their insect hosts. The bacteria spread across generations by vertical transmission through females. The presence of these bacteria is associated with a range of host effects—from cytoplasmic incompatibility (where infected males prevent or reduce the production of viable embryos when they mate with uninfected females), through to feminization (genetically programmed males turning into females) and parthenogenesis (where Wolbachia cause females to produce only female offspring). Recently, it has become apparent that Wolbachia infections influence the fitness of their hosts in diverse ways, by altering patterns of reproduction, resistance to microbial infections and the provision of nutrients (Hedges et al., 2008; Teixeira et al., 2008; Ghedin et al., 2008). Changes in Wolbachia or their host genomes in the same species have now been documented (Hornett et al., 2006; Weeks et al., 2007) and suggest that evolutionary shifts in Wolbachia–host interactions (and their host effects) can be rapid. Wolbachia can therefore mediate rapid evolutionary shifts in host reproductive patterns and fitness effects.

Parasitoid wasps reproduce by producing offspring that then develop in the immature stages of moths, spiders, aphids and other arthropods. Both wasps, and their host arthropods, are often infected by Wolbachia and the bacterial infections are known to influence the fitness, cytoplasmic incompatibility and parthenogenesis of their wasp hosts. Parasitoid wasps may even facilitate the horizontal spread of Wolbachia across different arthropods as they attack a range of host species, although this is likely to be a rare event (Haine et al., 2005; Baldo et al., 2008).

Kremer et al. now provide evidence for multiple phenotypic effects that seems to have evolved in Wolbachia residing in parasitoids of the genus Asobara. In an earlier work on the species A. tabida, it was discovered that Wolbachia controls oogenesis by influencing programmed cell death (Pannebakker et al., 2007). When Wolbachia were removed from strains after an antibiotic treatment, there was no oogenesis and therefore no offspring production. Wolbachia have therefore become essential for one component of Asobara reproduction. In this paper, Kremer et al. describe a different strain of Wolbachia isolated from a Japanese population of the species A. japonica. This population was known to produce only female offspring through parthenogenesis. The authors show that parthenogenesis no longer occurs once the Wolbachia are removed because male offspring are then produced. These male offspring court and attempt to mate with females, but the females from this population are no longer receptive to the males. The Wolbachia have therefore become essential for the continued persistence of this A. japonica population, although other populations around Japan that have not been infected by Wolbachia continue to exist and exhibit sexual reproduction. Unlike the Wolbachia strain found in A. tabida, the new strain of Wolbachia is not essential for oogenesis, because offspring are produced when Wolbachia are removed through antibiotics.

To test the origin of the new Wolbachia strain from A. japonica, Kremer et al. sequence a series of Wolbachia genes used earlier in phylogenetic analyses. They find that the new strain is closely related to the strain from A. tabida that is essential for oogenesis, and not necessarily related closely to strains of Wolbachia from other hosts where the infection results in parthenogenesis. Therefore, two related strains of Wolbachia that occur in Asobara species have quite different effects, presumably because of recent evolutionary divergence in a few genes responsible for triggering different host phenotypes. However, it is also possible that the host genome dictates the expression of the phenotype induced by Wolbachia—this could be tested by transfering different Wolbachia strains across populations and species.

The spread of Wolbachia in insect populations depends on host effects as well as the fidelity of Wolbachia transmission across generations. For Wolbachia causing parthenogenesis to spread at the expense of other strains they need to provide an advantage to their hosts in terms of female offspring production, and exhibit a low rate of leakage of the infection when transmitted from parents to offspring (Stouthamer, 1997). However, in the case of some populations of A. japonica, it seems that the Wolbachia have basically become essential for the wasps, because females are no longer able to mate successfully with uninfected males. Presumably, there has been DNA sequence decay in the genes controlling female components of the mating interaction. Therefore, even if Wolbachia-infected strains no longer have a reproductive advantage, the infection is likely to persist in these populations of A. japonica, at least in the short term, and perhaps until they are invaded by sexually reproducing A. japonica or a close competitor. Wolbachia–host associations in parasitoids might then represent evolutionarily transient phenomena; they may develop rapidly, but then be prone to displacement, unless a fitness benefit for the host has meanwhile evolved.


  1. Baldo L, Ayoub NA, Hayashi CY, Russell JA, Stahlhut JK, Werren JH (2008). Insight into the routes of Wolbachia invasion: high levels of horizontal transfer in the spider genus Agelenopsis revealed by Wolbachia strain and mitochondrial DNA diversity. Mol Ecol 17: 557–569.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghedin E, Daehnel K, Foster J, Slatko B, Lustigman S (2008). The symbiotic relationship between filarial parasitic nematodes and their Wolbachia endosymbionts—A resource for a new generation of control measures. Symbiosis 46: 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haine ER, Pickup NJ, Cook JM (2005). Horizontal transmission of Wolbachia in a Drosophila community. Ecol Entomol 30: 464–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hedges LM, Brownlie JC, O'Neill SL, Johnson KN (2008). Wolbachia and virus protection in insects. Science 322: 702.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hornett EA, Charlat S, Duplouy AMR, Davies N, Roderick GK, Wedell N, Hurst GDD (2006). Evolution of male-killer suppression in a natural population. PLoS Biol 4: 1643–1648.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pannebakker BA, Loppin B, Elemans CPH, Humblot L, Vavre F (2007). Parasitic inhibition of cell death facilitates symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 213–215.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stouthamer R (1997). Wolbachia-induced parthenogenesis. In: O'Neill SL, Hoffmann AA, Werren JH (eds). Influential Passengers: Inherited Microorganisms and Arthropod Reproduction. Oxford University Press: New York, pp 102–124.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teixeira L, Ferreira A, Ashburner M (2008). The bacterial symbiont Wolbachia induces resistance to RNA viral infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol 6: 2753–2763.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weeks AR, Turelli M, Harcombe WR, Reynolds KT, Hoffmann AA (2007). From parasite to mutualist: rapid evolution of Wolbachia in natural populations of Drosophila. PLoS Biol 5: 997–1005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Editor's suggested reading

  1. White JA, Kelly SE, Perlman SJ, Hunter MS (2009). Cytoplasmic incompatibility in the parasitic wasp Encarsia inaron: disentangling the roles of Cardinium and Wolbachia symbionts. Heredity Online 10.1038/hdy.2009.5.

  2. Clark ME, Bailey-Jourdain C, Ferree PM, England SJ, Sullivan W, Windsor DM, Werren JH (2008). Wolbachia modification of sperm does not always require residence within developing sperm. Heredity 101: 420–428.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sheeley SL, McAllister BF (2009). Mobile male-killer: similar Wolbachia strains kill males of divergent Drosophila hosts. Heredity 102: 286–292.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giorgini M, Monti MM, Caprio E, Stouthamer R, Hunter MS (2009). Feminization and the collapse of haplodiploidy in an asexual parasitoid wasp harboring the bacterial symbiont Cardinium. Heredity 102: 365–371.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to A A Hoffmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffmann, A. Essential but unhelpful wasp Wolbachia. Heredity 103, 194–195 (2009).

Download citation


Quick links