Abstract
Differences in mating time between populations can give rise to premating reproductive isolation. Tephritid fruit flies exhibit large variation in mating time among intra- or inter-specific populations. We previously cloned the clock gene period from two strains of melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae; in one the individuals mate early during the day, whereas in the other the individuals mate later. These strains were originally established by divergent artificial selection for developmental time, ‘short’ and ‘long’, with early and late mating times, respectively. The deduced amino acid sequences of PERIOD proteins for these two strains were reported to be identical. Here we cloned another clock gene cryptochrome (cry) from the two strains, and found two stable amino acid substitutions in the strains. In addition, the allele frequency at the two polymorphic sites of cry gene correlated with the circadian locomotor period (τ) across strains, whereas the expression pattern of cry mRNA in the heads of flies taken from the short strain significantly differed from that from the long strain. These findings suggest that variation in the cry gene is related to differences in the circadian behaviour in the two strains, thus implying that the cry gene may have an important role in reproductive isolation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Reproductive isolation among sympatric populations can be maintained by breeding at different time schedules (Miyatake, 2002b; Coyne and Orr, 2004). In the wild, temporal reproductive isolation results from differences in mating season in birds (Friesen et al., 2007), mating period in insects (Bush, 1969; Hendry et al., 2000), timing of gamete release in corals (Levitan et al., 2004), timing of migration and breeding in fishes (Quinn et al., 2000), and time of mating in flies (An et al., 2004).
Variation in the time of day at which mating occurs, has been widely observed in tephritid species, between both inter- and intra-species (see Miyatake, 1997a; Matsumoto et al., 2008). For example, there is a specific time of mating in two sibling species of Australian native tephritid fruit flies, Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Lewontin and Birch, 1966; An et al., 2002, 2004). Mating time may also be a reproductive barrier among three sympatric Anastrepha tephritid fly species in South America (Malavasi et al., 1983; Henning and Matioli, 2006).
For the melon fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), previous reports showed that there is a lack of synchrony in the timing of male courtship and copulation across natural populations (Suzuki and Koyama, 1980; Matsuyama and Kuba, 2009). Employing two-way artificial selection for developmental period in the flies, Miyatake (1995) established two strains of B. cucurbitae with short (S strain) and long (L strain) development times and found that the time of mating differed between the two strains; the S flies always mated at an earlier time than the L flies (Miyatake, 1997a). In addition, large variation in the free-running period of the circadian locomotor rhythm of the adult flies was observed between the two strains (Shimizu et al., 1997), thus suggesting that variation in the free-running period might control the difference in time of mating (Miyatake, 2002b). The results of crossing experiments between S and L flies suggest the presence of a major gene that controls the time of mating (Miyatake, 1997a).
In Drosophila, null mutants of the clock gene period (per) (per01) lost the circadian rhythm in mating activity (Sakai and Ishida, 2001). In addition, a different study, which used transformants of per derived from Drosophila melanogaster or Drosophila pseudoobscura, clarified that per transgenes carry species-specific information concerning the phases of both circadian locomotor and mating activity (Tauber et al., 2003). Thus, per can potentially lead to temporal mating isolation via changes in mating rhythms.
Our previous study of per in B. cucurbitae revealed that the two (S and L) strains differ in circadian periods of per mRNA cycling under constant dark (DD) conditions (S: 22 h, L: 30 h) (Miyatake et al., 2002). The full-length per gene of the two strains in B. cucurbitae were subsequently cloned and sequenced, however, the putative protein sequences were identical (Matsumoto et al., 2008, EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ accession no. AB517621 and AB517622, S and L strains, respectively). An et al. (2002) investigated the per gene in B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis, which also exhibit inter-specific differences in mating time, but similarly, no difference was found in the per gene sequence. Therefore, we observed differences in mating times in tephritid flies, which may be under the control of other clock genes (An et al., 2002, 2004; Matsumoto et al., 2008).
In insects, the circadian clock is described as a negative feedback loop involving rhythmic per and other clock genes transcription (Giebultowicz, 1999). Cryptochrome (cry) is a key circadian clock gene in Drosophila, encoding a photoreceptor (Stanewsky et al., 1998). The cry gene is expressed in the Drosophila adult brain, and is thought to function as a circadian pacemaker for behavioural rhythms (Emery et al., 2000). Cryb mutant flies show normal behavioural rhythms but exhibit poor synchronization to light–dark cycles (Stanewsky et al., 1998). These facts suggest that the cry gene has an important role in the entrainment of Drosophila's clock to light–dark cycles. In B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis, it has been suggested that the cry gene is related to mating isolation, as the expression patterns of cry transcripts in the brain and antennae differ in the two sibling species (An et al., 2004).
In this study, we aim to clarify the differences in characteristics of the cry gene between the two strains of B. cucurbitae. We compare the cry sequence in the two strains and analyse the correlation of the allele-type of the gene with circadian behaviour. In addition, we compare the cry mRNA expression pattern between the strains.
Materials and methods
Cloning and sequencing
We separated 15 individuals from each strain during the photophase and purified the total RNA from their heads using a Fast RNA kit (Q-BIO gene, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After DNase treatment, 5 μg of total RNA was used for reverse transcription to synthesize cDNA with Superscript II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out to amplify the cry gene, using cDNA as a template and a degenerate primer set based on the cry gene sequence of B. tryoni. The amplified fragments were cloned into a pCRII plasmid (Invitrogen) and sequenced using a BigDye terminator v3.1 Cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Tokyo, Japan) with an ABI PRISM 3100 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Untranslated regions were determined by the 5′ and 3′ RACE using a FirstChoice RLM-RACE kit (Ambion, Tokyo, Japan). Sequence analyses were carried out with at least three clones for each PCR fragment.
Allele characterization at sites 1212 and 1865 of the cry gene by PCR
To examine whether the two common amino acid polymorphisms found in the S and L strains relate to overt behavioural rhythmicity, we investigated individual genotypes at the two polymorphic sites using PCR and their free-running period (τ) in locomotor activity across strains. B. cucurbitae strains were established by selecting for S and L development time from a mass-reared stock of B. cucurbitae (Mass) maintained at the Okinawa Prefectural Plant Protection Center, Okinawa, Japan (for a detailed description of the protocol see Miyatake, 1995; Miyatake and Shimizu, 1999). Two replicate ‘young’ and ‘old’ strains (Y1, Y2, O1 and O2) were also established from the base population by selecting for young and old age at reproduction (for a detailed description of the protocol see Miyatake, 1997b, 2002a).
Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms at sites 1212 (cry1212) and 1865 (cry1865) of the cry gene (EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ accession no. AB517607 and AB517608, respectively), were characterized from a single fly by employing the PCR-amplification refractory mutations system method. In the first polymorphic site (cry1212), the following allele specific forward primers were used: l-cry primer 5′-GCTTGAAGAGATCATGTACACT-3′ or s-cry primer 5′-GCTTGAAGAGATCATGTACACG-3′ (positions 1233–1212, boldface represents 3′ tails allowing the selective amplification of l-cry or s-cry alleles, respectively). The common reverse primer was 5′-GTGCGTTCTCTATGTAACGACTT-3′ (positions 726–748). In the second polymorphic site (cry1865), the following allele-specific forward primers were used: l-cry primer 5′-GCGTGTACATTACGTTTTGATACA-3′ or s-cry primer 5′-GCGTGTACATTACGTTTTGATACT-3′ (positions 1887–1865, boldface represents 3′ tails allowing the selective amplification of l-cry or s-cry alleles respectively). The common reverse primer was 5′-GCGTGAGTACTTTTATACAATGT-3′ (positions 1307–1329). The PCR reaction was carried out for 28 cycles with 94 °C for 30 s, 61 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min using Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Japan). To examine the correlation between the allele frequency and circadian locomotor period across strains, Spearman's rank correlation was carried out (STATVIEW 5.0).
Monitoring of circadian locomotor activity
Locomotor (walking) activity of individual flies was recorded as described previously (Shimizu et al., 1997). In brief, adults were kept singly in containers and provided with water and sugar at 25±2 °C. Their locomotor activities were monitored via the interruptions of an infrared beam and a photoelectric switch (OMRON, Tokyo, Japan). The free-running period was computed from the least-square spectrum of free-running data that was collected for 2 weeks.
Whole head measurements of cry mRNA abundance
Before the analysis of the cry mRNA expression pattern, S and L flies were kept for at least 1 week in an environmental chamber, maintained at 25 °C, 60–80% RH and light–dark cycle 12:12 h conditions. Subsequently, over a period of 24 h five to twelve individuals were removed every 4 h. After the flies had been captured, they were immediately transferred into a freezer and stored at −80 °C until required. Two series of total RNA were extracted from each fly head using a Sepasol RNA I Super (Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan). After extracting the RNA mixture, we carried out DNase treatment. The abundance of cry mRNA was measured by quantitative real-time PCR with a MyiQ (Bio-Rad, Tokyo, Japan). We used the primer set for the cry gene of B. cucurbitae, 5′-AAACGAGCGAACGTCTTGTG-3′ and 5′-ATATCACTCGCTCCGCGTATGG-3′. As a control, we also used the primer set for the Gpdh gene, 5′-GTCGGGACATTAAGTATGCCAAAA-3′ and 5′-CCTAGACCATCGACGAAACCAG-3′. Gpdh is a general housekeeping gene of B. cucurbitae, expression of which should not change through time. The relative abundance of cry mRNA to Gpdh mRNA in each sample was thus obtained. The difference in mean cry mRNA expression across the S and L strains was tested using a t-test at each sampling point.
Results
Differences in the CRY sequence in S and L strains
To examine differences in the CRY sequence between the S and L strains, we first amplified and cloned a partial fragment of the cry gene in Bactrocera cucurbitae using RT-PCR. We used a degenerate primer set based on the cry sequence of B. tryoni. Two cDNA sequences of 2190 bp (S fly) and 2154 bp (L fly), respectively, were obtained (EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ accession no. AB517607 and AB517608, respectively). The coding region spanned nucleotide positions 360–2000 (S and L flies), which encodes 547 amino acids. CRY belongs to the Cryptochrome/Photolyase protein family, so we compared the putative amino acid sequence of Bactrocera CRY with CRY from other fly species (B. tryoni and D. melanogaster). The amino acid sequences showed high similarity to the cry genes in B. tryoni (94% identity) and D. melanogaster (73% identity). However, four stable nucleotide substitutions were detected between the S and L strains of Bactrocera's cry gene, two of them non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The former base-pair substitution (C1212A) changes an arginine (285) to a serine, the latter (A1865T) changes a lysine (502) to an asparagine in the S and L strains, respectively. The other two nucleotide substitutions were positioned within the 3′ untranslated region (Figure 1).
The frequency of the 1212 and 1865 base substitutions in the cry gene correlates with the period of behavioural rhythm
To examine whether the two common amino acid polymorphisms between the S and L strains relate to overt behavioural rhythmicity, we investigated individual genotypes at the two polymorphic sites by PCR and their free-running period (τ) in locomotor activity. The results showed that, in S and L strains, all individuals (100%) were S-type homozygous for both cry1212 and cry1865, whereas in the L strain, all individuals (100%) were L-type homozygous for both sites (Table 1). In the other strains, some individuals (20–45%) were S- and L-type heterozygous for each site, whereas others were S- or L-type homozygous for each site (Figure 2, Table 1). At both cry1212 and cry1865 sites, the S-type allele frequency in each strain showed a significant negative correlation with the mean free-running period of circadian locomotor rhythms (Spearman's rank test, cry1212: Rs= −0.857, P<0.05; cry1865: Rs= −0.857, P<0.05; Figure 3).
The expression pattern of cry mRNA differs in the two strains
To determine whether the expression patterns of cry mRNA are different between the two strains, we measured mRNA expression cycles in S- and L-type B. cucurbitae. The cry mRNA of S flies oscillated with approximately twofold amplitude between peak and through (analysis of variance P<0.01). In contrast, that of the L flies varied with little amplitude, and this was not statistically significant (analysis of variance P=0.16, Figure 4). In the S flies, the peak occurred at the end of the photophase (Bonferroni test, P<0.01). In the L flies, there was no peak at the end of the photophase, but a weak local peak occurred at the beginning of the scotophase. The amount of cry mRNA expression in the L flies was significantly higher than in the S flies at ZT2, 6 and 10, but not at ZT14, 20 and 22 (t-test, P<0.05).
Discussion
We identified two common amino acid substitutions in the clock gene cryptochrome in the tephritid fly, B. cucurbitae, in flies from the S strain, which mate early during the day, and flies from the L strain, which mate later (Miyatake et al., 2002). Both substitutions, at nucleotide positions 1212 and 1865, resulted in the replacement of amino acids: arginine with serine and lysine with asparagine at amino acid positions 285 and 502 in the S and L strains, respectively.
One of the two amino acid substitutions, is known to be located within the carboxy-terminal side of the DM1 region (Hemsley et al., 2007). Neither of the two amino acid substitutions were at cofactor binding sites, 5, 10-methenyltetra-hydrofolate, FAD and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (Figure 1). They were also different from the mutation site reported for the cryb mutant (Stanewsky et al., 1998).
We measured the two allele frequencies at sites 1212 and 1865 of the cry gene in the seven different strains of B. cucurbitae. All flies of the S and L strains were S-type homozygous for cry1212 and cry1865, whereas those from the L strains were L-type homozygous for cry1212 and cry1865. Flies from the remaining four strains have intermediate free-running periods between those of S and L strains (Shimizu et al., 1997; Miyatake, 2002a); these were heterozygous for cry1212 and cry1865, and homozygous for cry1212 and cry1865. In an inter-strain comparison, the mean circadian free-running periods across strains was negatively correlated with the S-type allele frequency (Figure 3). This suggests that these substitutions may alter the circadian free-running period in B. cucurbitae.
The insect CRY can be generally classified into two groups: one group (CRY1) functions primarily as a blue-light photoreceptor in clock cells (Emery et al., 2000), whereas the other (CRY2) constitutes potent transcriptional repressors, which could act within the clockwork itself (Zhu et al., 2005; Yuan et al., 2007). Drosophila's CRY (CRY1) is also reported to function as a transcriptional repressor for the clockwork itself (Ivanchenko et al., 2001; Collins et al., 2006). The B. cucurbitae CRY shows greater similarity to Drosophila CRY1 (73% identity) than Tribolium CRY2 (40% identity) and Apis CRY2 (39% identity). The CRY of Bactrocera appears to be a member of the Drosophila CRY group.
Transformed Drosophila flies, in which the CRY (CRY1) function was genetically manipulated by overexpression of the carboxy terminus-removed CRY, showed a longer free-running period of locomotor activity than wild-type flies (Dissel et al., 2004). This carboxy terminus region consists of two parts: one is involved in direct interactions with other molecules, the other represses these interactions in a light-dependent manner (Hemsley et al., 2007). One of the two amino acid substitutions (CRY502) in B. cucurbitae, was located in the carboxy-terminal side, positioned within the former part of the carboxy terminus region. This amino acid substitution (CRY502) might affect interactions with other molecules. Further, the change such interactions with other molecules could alter the circadian period between S- and L-strain.
We demonstrated a daily rhythm of cry mRNA expression in the adult head of S flies in B. cucurbitae: cry mRNA level was downregulated during scotophase and upregulated at the end of photophase. However, the mRNA level in flies from the L strain was less than in the S strain (Figure 4). In two closely related tephritid species, B. neohumeralis that mates at midday and B. tryoni that mates at dusk, expression levels of the cry gene are higher in the former species than in the latter, in both the brain and the antennae (An et al., 2004). As in B. cucurbitae S strain flies mate earlier than L strain flies (Miyatake et al., 2002), our results are consistent with the relationship between B. neohumeralis and B. tryoni.
The lower levels of cry mRNA in the L strain may be because the light–dark cycle of 24 h does not permit the natural long cry cycle to take place. It has previously been reported that L flies mate after the onset of the dark phase of the light–dark cycle (Miyatake, 1997a). One possible explanation for this is that a reduction in photosensitivity resulting from low levels of cry mRNA L flies may cause insensitivity to the light–dark transition.
It is possible that the cry gene might have an important role in altering the time of mating by lengthening of the circadian period and reduction of light–dark transition sensitivity in the L strain of B. cucurbitae. The Cry gene, as well as the clock gene period (Tauber et al., 2003), could thus be an indispensable gene for maintaining reproductive isolation.
Challenges for the future include determining whether the two amino acid substitutions in B. cucurbitae's CRY are the principal cause of variation in circadian locomotor period and mating time, by employing a reverse genetic approach similar to that previously utilized in Drosophila. We think that the two substitutions of the B. cucurbitae's cry gene reported here, could be responsible for the observed differences in circadian locomotor period and mating time in the two strains. However it is possible that other minor genes affect them (see Miyatake, 1997a). Further analysis involving other genes will further clarify what is potentially a novel mechanism of reproductive isolation.
Here we have demonstrated variation in mRNA sequence and expression for the circadian photoreceptor gene CRY in two strains of a Tephritid fly. Our findings imply that CRY might have an important role in maintaining allochronic reproductive isolation through shifting the time of mating.
Accession codes
References
An X, Tebo M, Song S, Frommer M, Raphael KA (2004). The cryptochrome (cry) gene and a mating isolation mechanism in tephritid fruit flies. Genetics 168: 2025–2036.
An X, Wilkes K, Bastian Y, Morrow JL, Frommer M, Raphael KA (2002). The period gene in two species of tephritid fruit fly differentiated by mating behaviour. Insect Mol Biol 11: 419–430.
Bush GL (1969). Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of Genus rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 23: 237–251.
Collins B, Mazzoni EO, Stanewsky R, Blau J (2006). Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME is a circadian transcriptional repressor. Curr Biol 16: 441–449.
Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004). Speciation. Sinauer Associates Inc.: Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
Dissel S, Codd V, Fedic R, Garner KJ, Costa R, Kyriacou CP et al. (2004). A constitutively active cryptochrome in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Neurosci 7: 834–840.
Emery P, Stanewsky R, Helfrich-Forster C, Emery-Le M, Hall JC, Rosbash M (2000). Drosophila CRY is a deep brain circadian photoreceptor. Neuron 26: 493–504.
Friesen VL, Smith AL, Gomez-Diaz E, Bolton M, Furness RW, Gonzalez-Solis J et al. (2007). Sympatric speciation by allochrony in a seabird. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 18589–18594.
Giebultowicz JM (1999). Insect circadian clocks: is it all in their heads? J Insect Physiol 45: 791–800.
Hemsley MJ, Mazzotta GM, Mason M, Dissel S, Stefano Toppo S, Pagano MA et al. (2007). Linear motifs in the C-terminus of D. melanogaster cryptochrome. Biochem Bioph Res Co 355: 531–537.
Hendry AP, Wenburg JK, Bentzen P, Volk EC, Quinn TP (2000). Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290: 516–518.
Henning F, Matioli SR (2006). Mating time of the west Indian fruit fly Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera : tephritidae) under laboratory conditions. Neotrop Entomol 35: 145–148.
Ivanchenko M, Stanewsky R, Giebultowicz JM (2001). Circadian photoreception in Drosophila: functions of cryptochrome in peripheral and central clocks. J Biol Rhythms 16: 205–215.
Levitan DR, Fukami H, Jara J, Kline D, McGovern TM, McGhee KE et al. (2004). Mechanisms of reproductive isolation among sympatric broadcast-spawning corals of the Montastraea annularis species complex. Evolution 58: 308–323.
Lewontin RC, Birch LC (1966). Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution 20: 315–336.
Malavasi A, Morgante JS, Prokopy RJ (1983). Distribution and activities of Anastrepha-fraterculus (Diptera, Tephritidae) flies on host and non-host trees. Ann Entomol Soc Am 76: 286–292.
Matsumoto A, Ohta Y, Itoh TQ, Sanada-Morimura S, Matsuyama T, Fuchikawa T et al. (2008). Period gene of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) among strains with different mating times and sterile insect technique. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101: 1121–1130.
Matsuyama T, Kuba H (2009). Mating time and call frequency of males between mass-reared and wild strains of melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Appl Entomol Zool 44: 309–314.
Miyatake T (1995). 2-way artificial selection for developmental period in Bactrocera-cucurbitae (Diptera, Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 88: 848–855.
Miyatake T (1997a). Correlated responses to selection for developmental period in Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): Time of mating and daily activity rhythms. Behav Genet 27: 489–498.
Miyatake T (1997b). Genetic trade-off between early fecundity and longevity in Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Heredity 78: 93–100.
Miyatake T (2002a). Circadian rhythm and time of mating in Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera : Tephritidae) selected for age at reproduction. Heredity 88: 302–306.
Miyatake T (2002b). Pleiotropic effect, clock genes, and reproductive isolation. Popul Ecol 44: 201–207.
Miyatake T, Matsumoto A, Matsuyama T, Ueda HR, Toyosato T, Tanimura T (2002). The period gene and allochronic reproductive isolation in Bactrocera cucurbitae. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269: 2467–2472.
Miyatake T, Shimizu T (1999). Genetic correlations between life-history and behavioral traits can cause reproductive isolation. Evolution 53: 201–208.
Quinn TP, Unwin MJ, Kinnison MT (2000). Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: Genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding by introduced chinook salmon populations. Evolution 54: 1372–1385.
Sakai T, Ishida N (2001). Circadian rhythms of female mating activity governed by clock genes in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 9221–9225.
Shimizu T, Miyatake T, Watari Y, Arai T (1997). A gene pleiotropically controlling developmental and circadian periods in the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Heredity 79: 600–605.
Stanewsky R, Kaneko M, Emery P, Beretta B, Wager-Smith K, Kay SA et al. (1998). The cryb mutation identifies cryptochrome as a circadian photoreceptor in Drosophila. Cell 95: 681–692.
Suzuki Y, Koyama J (1980). Temporal aspects of mating-behavior of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae coquillett (Diptera, Tephritidae)—a comparison between laboratory and wild strains. Appl Entomol Zool 15: 215–224.
Tauber E, Roe H, Costa R, Hennessy JM, Kyriacou CP (2003). Temporal mating isolation driven by a behavioral gene in Drosophila. Curr Biol 13: 140–145.
Yuan Q, Metterville D, Briscoe AD, Reppert SM (2007). Insect cryptochromes: gene duplication and loss define diverse ways to construct insect circadian clocks. Mol Biol Evol 24: 948–955.
Zhu H, Yuan Q, Froy O, Casselman A, Reppert SM (2005). The two CRYs of the butterfly. Curr Biol 15: R953–R954.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (Nos. 16370013 and 19370011 to TM) and Research Project for Urgent Technical Problems and Development in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF). The transportation and utilization of sterilized melon flies were conducted by permission of the Yokohama Plant Protection Station, MAFF. The authors thank Dr T Sakamoto (Okayama University, Japan) for his technical advice and Dr Z Lewis (Okayama University, Japan) for useful comments on the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuchikawa, T., Sanada, S., Nishio, R. et al. The clock gene cryptochrome of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in strains with different mating times. Heredity 104, 387–392 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2009.167
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2009.167
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Polygene control and trait dominance in death-feigning syndrome in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum
Behavior Genetics (2022)
-
Light input pathways to the circadian clock of insects with an emphasis on the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster
Journal of Comparative Physiology A (2020)
-
The characterization of the circadian clock in the olive fly Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) reveals a Drosophila-like organization
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
Extensive circadian and light regulation of the transcriptome in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae
BMC Genomics (2013)
-
bHLH-ORANGE family genes regulate the expression of E-box clock genes in Drosophila
Applied Entomology and Zoology (2011)