Abstract
In comparing a particular DNA profile with that from an unknown (but distinct) individual, matches at different loci between the profiles will not be independent, even in a randomly mating population, because of the presence in the population of relatives of the individuals. The paper contains a theoretical analysis of the extent of this effect on the match probability, for profiling techniques which separately probe different loci. Naive calculation using the product rule could substantially understate the match probability. Past a certain point, the testing of additional loci provides no more information than would be available in discriminating between sibs. The correlation effect described here would be unimportant in criminal casework if close relatives of the suspect, and in particular full-sibs, were excluded as possible culprits. In the absence of such exclusions the current practice of effectively ignoring such relatives in presenting match probabilities could be extremely prejudicial to a suspect, even in cases in which there is no direct evidence to incriminate his/her relatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Balding, D J, and Donnelly, P. 1995. Inference in forensic identification. J R Statist Soc A (in press).
Balding, D I, and Nichols, R A. 1994. DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Sci Int, 64, 125–140.
Brinkman, B, Rand, S, and Weigand, P. 1991. Population and family data RFLP's using selected single- and multi-locus systems. Int J Leg Med, 104, 81–86.
Donnelly, P. 1992. Discussion of statistical inference in crime investigation using deoxyribonucleic acid profiling (by D. A. Berry, I. W. Evett and R. Pinchin). Appl Stat, 41, 524–525.
Evett, I W. 1992. Evaluating DNA profiles in the case where the defence is It was my brother. J Forensic Sci Soc, 32, 5–14.
Evett, I W, Scranage, J, and Pinchin, R. 1993. An illustration of the advantages of efficient statistical methods for RFLP analysis in forensic science. Am J Hum Genet, 52, 498–505.
Ferri, E. 1984. Stepchildren: A National Study. Eastern Press, London.
Jeffreys, A J, Royle, N J, Patel, I, Armour, J A L, Macleod, A, Collick, A, Gray, I G, Neumann, R, Gibbs, M, Crosier, M, Hill, M, Signer, E, and Monckton, D. 1991a. Principles and recent advances in human DNA fingerprinting. In: Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A. J. and Wolff, R. (eds) DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Applications, pp. 1–19. Birkhäuser, Basel
Jeffreys, A J, Macleod, A, Tamaki, K, Neil, D L, Monckton, D G. 1991b. Minisatellite repeat coding as a digital approach to DNA typing. Nature, 354, 204–209.
Kingman, J F C. 1982. Exchangeability and the evolution of large populations. In: Koch, G. and Spizzichino, F. (eds) Exchangeability in Probability and Statistics, pp. 97–102. North Holland, Amsterdam.
National Research Council of the USA. 1992. DNA Technology in Forensic Science. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Risch, N J, and Devlin, B. 1992a. On the probability of matching DNA fingerprints. Science, 255, 717–720.
Risch, N, and Devlin, B. 1992b. DNA fingerprint matches. Science, 256, 1744–1746.
Roberts, L. 1991. Fight erupts over DNA fingerprinting. Science, 254, 1721–1723.
Roeder, K. 1994. DNA fingerprinting: a review of the controversy, Stat Sci, 9, 222–278.
Spanier, G B, and Furstenberg, F F. 1987. Remarriage and reconstituted families. In: Sussman, M. B. and Steinmetz, S. K. (eds) Handbook of Marriage and the Family, pp. 419–434. Plenum Press, New York.
Weir, B S. 1992. Independence of VNTR alleles defined as fixed bins. Genetics, 130, 873–887.
Acknowledgements
I acknowledge helpful discussions with David Balding and Richard Nichols, and thank Adrian Roe for the preparation of the figures. This work was supported in part by SERC grants GR/F 98727, GR/G11101,andB/AF 1255.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donnelly, P. Nonindependence of matches at different loci in DNA profiles: quantifying the effect of close relatives on the match probability. Heredity 75, 26–34 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1995.100
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1995.100
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
It was one of my brothers
International Journal of Legal Medicine (2006)
-
Evaluation of DNA mixtures involving two pairs of relatives
International Journal of Legal Medicine (2005)
-
Abundance, genetic diversity and conservation of Louisiana black bears (Ursus americanus luteolus) as detected through noninvasive sampling
Conservation Genetics (2004)
-
Abundance, genetic diversity and conservation of Louisiana black bears (Ursus americanus luteolus) as detected through noninvasive sampling
Conservation Genetics (2004)
-
A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity
Genetica (1995)