Summary
From each of two populations of Drosophila melanogaster, collected two months previously, from Chateau Tahbilk, S. Australia and Groningen, The Netherlands, duplicate populations were initiated in each of four environments which differed in their degree of environmental heterogeneity. Differing combinations of three food media based on oatmeal/treacle, potato or fig were used to simulate levels of environmental heterogeneity within the populations. The polymorphic loci, Adh, Est-6, G-6pdh, α-Gpdh, Pgm, Lap-D and Aph in both the Chateau Tahbilk and Groningen derived populations and 6Pgdh, which was only polymorphic in the populations which came from Chateau Tahbilk, were monitored in the experiment. The populations maintained a size of about 2500 adults and were sampled after 16 and 32 generations.
Large changes of phenotype frequency were shown by all loci. Despite a frequent divergence of phenotype frequencies between duplicate cages, systematic effects of occasion and environment were present and allele frequencies at many loci were shown to be changing at a faster rate than could be due to random genetic drift.
Genetic heterozygosity differed between environments but was not positively correlated with degree of environmental heterogeneity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Ayala, F J. 1972. Darwinian versus non-Darwinian evolution in natural populations of Drosophila. Proc Sixth Berkeley Symp Math Stat Prob, Vol. V, 211–236.
Barker, J S F. 1962. The estimation of generation interval in experimental populations of Drosophila. Genet Res, 3, 388–404.
Crow, J F, and Morton, N E. 1955. Measurement of gene frequency drift in small populations. Evolution, 9, 202–214.
Van Delden, W, Boerema, A C, and Kamping, A. 1978. The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Selection in different environments. Genetics, 90, 161–191.
Dempster, E. 1955. Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harbour Symp Quant Biol, 20, 25–32.
Fisher, R A, and Ford, E B. 1947. The spread of a gene in natural conditions in a colony of the moth Panaxia dominula L. Heredity, 1, 143–174.
Gillespie, J H. 1974. The role of environmental grain in the maintenance of genetic variation. Amer Nat, 108, 831–836.
Gillespie, J H. 1976. A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. II. Characterisation of the fitness function. Amer Nat, 110, 809–821.
Gillespie, J H, and Langley, C H. 1974. A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. Genetics, 76, 837–848.
Haldane, J B S, and Jayakar, S D. 1963. Polymorphism due to selection of varied direction. J Genet, 58, 291–317.
Hickey, D A. 1977. Selection for amylase allozymes in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 31, 800–804.
De Jong, G, and Scharloo, W. 1976. Environmental determination of selective significance or neutrality of amylase variants in Drosophila melanogaster. 2. The relationship between ADH activity and adult mortality. Biochem Genet, 16, 541–551.
Kamping, A, and Van Delden, W. 1978. The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 2. The relationship between ADH activity and adult mortality. Biochem Genet, 16, 541–551.
Kullback, S. 1959. Information theory and statistics. Wiley, New York.
Levene, H. 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Amer Nat, 87, 331–333.
Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princetown, New Jersey.
Levins, R, and MacArthur, R. 1966. The maintenance of genetic polymorphism in a spatially heterogeneous environment: variations on a theme by Howard Levene. Amer Nat, 100, 585–589.
Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Amer Nat, 100, 637–650.
McDonald, J F, and Ayala, F J. 1974. Genetic response to environmental heterogeneity. Nature, 250, 572–574.
Minawa, A, and Birley, A J. 1975. Genetical and environmental diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature, 255, 702–704.
Minawa, A, and Birley, A J. 1978. The genetical response to natural selection by varied environments. I. Short-term observations. Heredity, 40, 39–50.
Poulik, M D. 1957. Starch gel electrophoresis in a discontinuous system of buffers. Nature, 180, 1477.
Powell, J R. 1971. Genetic polymorphism in varied environments. Science, 174, 1035–1036.
Strobeck, C. 1975. Selection in a fine grained environment. Amer Nat, 109, 419–425.
Templeton, A R, and Rothman, E D. 1974. Evolution in heterogeneous environments. Amer Nat, 108, 409–428.
Wallis, B B, and Fox, A S. 1968. Genetic and developmental relationships between two alkaline phosphatases in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem Genet, 2, 141–158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haley, C., Birley, A. The genetical response to natural selection by varied environments: II. Observations on replicate populations in spatially varied laboratory environments. Heredity 51, 581–606 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1983.72
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1983.72
This article is cited by
-
Experimental evolution in Chlamydomonas. I. Short-term selection in uniform and diverse environments
Heredity (1997)
-
Micro-evolution in a wine cellar population: An historical perspective
Genetica (1993)
-
Soft selection and quantitative genetic variation: a laboratory experiment
Heredity (1991)
-
Restriction endonuclease map variation in the Adh region in populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Biochemical Genetics (1986)