Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    . Metaphor variation in cultural context: perspectives from anthropology. Eur J Engl Stud 2004;8:275–294.

  2. 2.

    & . Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, 1980.

  3. 3.

    & . Responsible use of language in scientific writing and science communication. BioScience. 2014;64:719–724.

  4. 4.

    , & . Analogical reasoning in handling emerging technologies: the case of umbilical cord blood biobanking. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:49–57.

  5. 5.

    . Biobanks, bioethics and concepts of donated blood in the UK. Sociol Health Illn 2006;28:850–865.

  6. 6.

    , , & . Precision engagement: the PMI’s success will depend on more than genomes and big data. Genet Med 2017;19:620–624.

  7. 7.

    , , et al. Healing without waging war: beyond military metaphors in medicine and HIV cure research. Am J Bioeth 2016;16:3–11.

  8. 8.

    . Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 2010;51:12–23.

  9. 9.

    , & . Getting ahead of illness: using metaphors to influence medical decision making. Med Decis Making 2014;35:37–45.

  10. 10.

    , , et al. Recipes or blueprints for our genes? How contexts selectively activate the multiple meanings of metaphors. Q J Speech 2002;88:303–325.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health/National Library of Medicine (1R01LM012180-01). We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of our colleagues from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute: Meghan Halley for her work in developing the focus groups and videos, and analysis; Lu Wah Hung and Yasmin Hernandez for translation of videos, focus group materials, and data to and from Mandarin and Spanish, respectively, and for leading focus groups; and Harold S. Luft for valuable input on instrument and study design. This study was approved by the institutional review boards of Stanford University and the Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, with the informed consent of research participants.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA

    • Mildred K Cho
    • , Nina Varsava
    • , David Magnus
    • , Kelly E Ormond
    •  & Sandra S -J Lee
  2. Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

    • Stephanie A Kraft
    •  & Benjamin S Wilfond
  3. Division of Bioethics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine

    • Stephanie A Kraft
    •  & Benjamin S Wilfond
  4. Booster Shot Media, Santa Monica, California, USA

    • Gary Ashwal
    •  & Alex Thomas
  5. Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA

    • Katie Gillespie
  6. Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA

    • Kelly E Ormond

Authors

  1. Search for Mildred K Cho in:

  2. Search for Nina Varsava in:

  3. Search for Stephanie A Kraft in:

  4. Search for Gary Ashwal in:

  5. Search for Katie Gillespie in:

  6. Search for David Magnus in:

  7. Search for Kelly E Ormond in:

  8. Search for Alex Thomas in:

  9. Search for Benjamin S Wilfond in:

  10. Search for Sandra S -J Lee in:

Competing interests

G.A. and A.T. are cofounders of Booster Shot Media, the company that produced the video content described in this article, and were consultants on the National Institutes of Health grant that supported this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mildred K Cho.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.204