ACMG Standards and Guidelines | Published:

Laboratory diagnosis of creatine deficiency syndromes: a technical standard and guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

Genetics in Medicine volume 19, pages 256263 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Disclaimer: These ACMG Standards and Guidelines are intended as an educational resource for clinical laboratory geneticists to help them provide quality clinical laboratory genetic services. Adherence to these standards and guidelines is voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These Standards and Guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of others that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, clinical laboratory geneticists should apply their professional judgment to the specific circumstances presented by the patient or specimen. Clinical laboratory geneticists are encouraged to document in the patient’s record the rationale for the use of a particular procedure or test, whether or not it is in conformance with these Standards and Guidelines. They also are advised to take notice of the date any particular guideline was adopted, and to consider other relevant medical and scientific information that becomes available after that date. It also would be prudent to consider whether intellectual property interests may restrict the performance of certain tests and other procedures.

Cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes are neurometabolic conditions characterized by intellectual disability, seizures, speech delay, and behavioral abnormalities. Several laboratory methods are available for preliminary and confirmatory diagnosis of these conditions, including measurement of creatine and related metabolites in biofluids using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry or gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, enzyme activity assays in cultured cells, and DNA sequence analysis. These guidelines are intended to standardize these procedures to help optimize the diagnosis of creatine deficiency syndromes. While biochemical methods are emphasized, considerations for confirmatory molecular testing are also discussed, along with variables that influence test results and interpretation.

Genet Med 19 2, 256–263.

Overview

Cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes (CDSs) consist of three neurodevelopmental disorders caused by dysfunctional creatine biosynthesis or transport. Deficiency of the two biosynthetic enzymes exhibit autosomal recessive inheritance, while creatine transport deficiency is an X-linked trait. All three conditions are characterized by muscle hypotonia, speech delay, seizures, intellectual impairment, and behavioral abnormalities (including autistic and autoaggressive behaviors) associated with absent or nearly absent levels of creatine in the central nervous system. In vivo diagnosis of these conditions may be accomplished using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which detects reduced levels of creatine in the brain of an affected individual. However, more practical and specific preliminary diagnostic evaluation is possible by measuring creatine and related metabolites (guanidinoacetate and creatinine) in blood and/or urine, using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Confirmatory diagnostic methods include enzymatic or uptake studies in cultured cells or DNA sequence analysis. In general, disorders of creatine biosynthesis can be treated with oral creatine supplementation and dietary manipulations, which seem more effective when started early in life.1,2,3 Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency requires additional treatment with ornithine and benzoate, aimed at reducing the toxic overproduction of guanidinoacetate.4,5 Creatine transport deficiency is not currently amenable to therapeutic intervention, although several creatine derivatives have been investigated for treatment efficacy.6,7,8,9,10,11,12

Background

Sources of creatine

Creatine (2-methyl-guanidinoethanoic acid) is a nitrogenous organic acid best known for its important role in supplementing cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production, particularly in skeletal muscle and brain. The majority (~95%) of creatine reserves are located in skeletal muscle,13 although this is not an important biosynthetic tissue. While approximately half of the creatine found in the body is obtained from dietary consumption of meat and fish, this substance is also produced endogenously in several human tissues.

Endogenous creatine production in humans (Figure 1) requires the coordinated activities of two enzymes, l-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT; EC:2.1.4.1) and GAMT (EC:2.1.1.2). AGAT catalyzes the transfer of an amidino group from arginine to glycine, forming guanidinoacetate, which is then methylated by GAMT to form creatine.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Creatine metabolic pathway, including biosynthesis, uptake by cells, phosphotransfer, and conversion to creatinine. AGAT: arginine:glycine amidinotransferase; GAMT: guanidinoacetate methyltransferase; CK: creatine kinase.

Circulatory creatine is taken up by tissues and reabsorbed in the renal tubules via the creatine transporter (CRTR), encoded by SLC6A8. Stores of creatine must be continuously replenished from endogenous and exogenous sources, as creatine spontaneously converts to creatinine at a constant rate of approximately 2%/day.14 Chemically stable under physiological conditions, creatinine is excreted in the urine and can be used to calculate the glomerular filtration rate, a widely utilized measure of kidney function.15

Functions of creatine

The primary physiological role of creatine is to act as a temporal and spatial buffer for ATP.16,17 Isoforms of creatine kinase catalyze a reversible reaction in which creatine and ATP interconvert with phosphocreatine and adenosine diphosphate (Figure 1). Phosphocreatine is stored in muscle, which provides a rapidly available source of high-energy phosphate for ATP regeneration. This process maintains optimal ATP–to–adenosine diphosphate ratios, thereby facilitating myosin and Ca2+ ATPase functions required for contractile burst energy. In the central nervous system, the precise role(s) of creatine is less well defined but likely involves multiple ATP-dependent processes underlying brain function and development.18

Creatine may also have several important “secondary” physiological functions. In particular, creatine might act as a neuromodulator or even neurotransmitter.19 In support of this assertion, neuronal creatine is released in an action potential–dependent exocytotic manner,18 and the presence of CRTR in the synaptosomal membrane could facilitate creatine reuptake.20 In addition, creatine possesses antioxidant activity, protects cell membranes, promotes bone and muscle growth, and has neuroprotective properties.16

Biochemical and molecular characteristics of AGAT, GAMT, and CRTR

AGAT is encoded by GATM (NM_001482.2) on 15q21.1 and is primarily expressed in the kidneys and pancreas. The enzyme functions as a dimer, and two slightly different isoforms have been localized to the cytosol (391 amino acid monomer) and the mitochondrial intermembrane space (386 amino acids),21 respectively. AGAT generates both guanidinoacetate and ornithine via transfer of the amidino group from arginine to glycine. This reaction represents the rate-limiting step of creatine biosynthesis and is negatively regulated by both creatine and ornithine.21 AGAT deficiency appears to be the rarest of the creatine deficiency syndromes, with a small number of patients reported thus far.22

The GAMT gene (NM_138924.2) maps to chromosome 19p13.3. The monomeric protein is 236 amino acids in size and is mainly found in the cytosol of liver, pancreas, and kidney cells. GAMT synthesizes creatine via methylation of guanidinoacetate, concomitant with conversion of the methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine to S-adenosylhomocysteine. At least 50 different pathogenic GAMT variants have been reported, including nonsense and missense variants, insertions, deletions, frameshifts, and splice errors.4,23 The most common pathogenic variants are c.327G>A (p.K109K, splice site exon 2) and c.59G>C (p.W20S).4

AGAT and GAMT are also expressed in neurons and microglia, suggesting that central nervous system creatine synthesis might be necessary to compensate for the limited passage of creatine across the blood–brain barrier.24

Uptake and storage of both endogenously synthesized and dietary creatine is facilitated by CRTR, a sodium-dependent, solute carrier–type protein of 635 amino acids encoded by SLC6A8 (NM_001142805.1) on Xq28.25,26 While the majority of creatine is stored in skeletal muscle, CRTR is also found in the plasma membrane of kidney, brain, heart, colon, testis, and prostate cells.27 CRTR deficiency is the most prevalent disorder of creatine metabolism, and approximately 65 pathogenic SLC6A8 variants have been described to date.28,29

Clinical description of CDSs

AGAT (OMIM 612718), GAMT (OMIM 612736), and CRTR (OMIM 300352) deficiencies cause a continuum of clinical phenotypes known as cerebral CDSs. Neurological manifestations dominate the CDS phenotype, demonstrating the important physiological role of creatine in the central nervous system. Symptoms typically appear during infancy to early childhood and include cognitive impairment, developmental and speech delays, muscle hypotonia, seizures, movement disorders, and behavioral abnormalities, including autism spectrum and autoaggressive behaviors. Patients with AGAT deficiency may also have a prominent myopathy.30 GAMT deficiency often shows a more complex phenotype (intractable seizures, extrapyramidal movement abnormalities, and dysfunction of the basal ganglia), which may be attributed to the specific toxicity of accumulating guanidinoacetate.5,24 Females heterozygous for SLC6A8 pathogenic variants may be asymptomatic or present with signs and symptoms of variable severity, ranging from learning disabilities to seizures.31,32,33

Treatment

Deficiency of both AGAT and GAMT can be treated with oral supplementation of creatine monohydrate. In addition, GAMT deficiency requires arginine restriction through a low-protein diet, and ornithine supplementation and benzoate (reduces glycine levels via the formation and excretion of hippuric acid) to reduce guanidinoacetate synthesis and its associated toxicity (creatine supplementation also partially inhibits guanidinoacetate formation4,5). Treatment for CRTR deficiency is not currently available, but studies of cyclocreatine in an SLC6A8 knockout mouse model have generated promising results.10

Biochemical testing for CDSs

Cerebral creatine deficiency can be detected in vivo using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, but this approach is expensive, requires sedation and/or anesthesia in children, and fails to specify the CDS. Therefore, the initial diagnosis is typically established by measuring creatine, guanidinoacetate, and creatinine via LC-MS/MS or GC-MS in plasma, urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or dried blood spots (Table 1). These tests can effectively differentiate creatine-deficient patients with AGAT deficiency (characterized by significantly reduced guanidinoacetate and creatine concentrations) from those with GAMT deficiency (elevated guanidinoacetate concentrations with low creatine levels), and can identify hemizygous males with X-linked creatine transporter deficiency (increased urinary excretion of creatine, which is associated with an increased creatine-to-creatinine ratio). Females heterozygous for creatine transporter deficiency may present with ambiguously elevated urinary creatine levels, but this approach is not considered reliable for this particular population. Measurements of creatine and guanidinoacetate in plasma are recommended for the diagnosis of AGAT and GAMT deficiency. Measurements of creatine, creatinine, and guanidinoacetate in urine identify male patients with creatine transporter deficiency and patients with GAMT deficiency after the neonatal period. Patients with AGAT deficiency may be missed by the study of urine creatine and guanidinoacetate alone because of inherently low concentrations of these compounds in some unaffected individuals. Additionally, patients with GAMT deficiency in the newborn period may have normal guanidinoacetate-to-creatinine ratios in urine;34,35 hence, it is important to evaluate plasma in this age group. In the event of an abnormal metabolite test result, repeat analysis is recommended because of the relatively low specificity of elevated urinary creatine in the diagnosis of creatine transporter deficiency, and low guanidinoacetate and creatine concentrations in AGAT deficiency.36,37

Table 1: Characteristic metabolite patterns for creatine deficiency disorders

Definitive confirmation of the diagnosis requires DNA sequencing of the appropriate gene and (if molecular analysis is ambiguous) measurement of AGAT or GAMT enzyme activity or of CRTR-mediated transport. Confirmation by these methods is important because other conditions (see below) may cause altered concentrations of creatine and guanidinoacetate in plasma and urine. Determination of AGAT and GAMT activity requires specific isotope-labeled substrates,38 which may not be commercially available. CRTR-mediated uptake of creatine into fibroblasts can be measured by isotope dilution GC-MS38 or by uptake of radiolabeled creatine.39 Molecular analysis is based on sequencing of all coding regions, exon/intron boundaries, and promoter regions where applicable. In addition, molecular analysis may be used for carrier identification as well as prenatal and preimplantation testing. While an in-depth description of GATM, GAMT, and SLC6A8 molecular sequence analysis is beyond the scope of these guidelines, it should be noted that analysis of SLC6A8 is complicated by the presence of pseudogenes and relatively high GC content.40

Prevalence

CDSs produce a relatively nonspecific phenotype and are likely underdiagnosed. Nevertheless, these disorders are among the most important known metabolic causes of intellectual impairment and autistic behaviors. CRTR deficiency is the most common creatine deficiency syndrome, with over 150 patients reported,29,41 accounting for approximately 2% of males with nonsyndromic, X-linked intellectual disability (after fragile X has been ruled out47,48,49) and 0.3 to 2.2% of males with an IQ less than 70.36,50 GAMT deficiency is the second most common creatine disorder, with approximately 110 patients reported worldwide.41 In Utah, the minimum frequency for this disorder was estimated to be 1 in 114,0005, while in the Netherlands a pilot newborn screening study estimated an incidence of 1 in 250,000).41 AGAT deficiency appears to be much rarer, with fewer than 20 patients reported to date.3,30,42,43,44,45,46

Modes of inheritance

CDS due to AGAT or GAMT deficiencies are inherited as autosomal recessive traits, while deficiency of CRTR is inherited as an X-linked trait.

Preanalytical Requirements

Sample types

Quantitative analysis of creatine, guanidinoacetate, and creatinine can be reliably performed in urine, plasma, CSF, and dried blood spots.51 The low metabolite concentrations in CSF require methods with high sensitivity. For the diagnosis of AGAT or GAMT deficiency, either plasma or urine can be used, although testing sensitivity may increase if both sample types are analyzed concurrently. Urine is the sample of choice for diagnosing creatine transporter deficiency in males, as plasma creatine concentrations are typically normal in this condition. Fasting samples are preferred, since dietary intake of creatine may increase urinary excretion.36

In vitro analysis of AGAT and GAMT enzyme activities can be carried out in Epstein-Barr virus–transformed lymphoblasts, while GAMT activity and CRTR-mediated creatine transport can be measured in cultured fibroblasts.38,39

Molecular genetic studies (including carrier and prenatal testing) can be performed on DNA isolated from leukocytes, fibroblasts, or dried blood spots. Sequence analysis of the SLC6A8 gene is recommended for diagnosing manifesting heterozygote females with a creatine transporter deficiency, as urinary creatine concentration, creatine uptake, and brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies may be inconclusive in these patients.

Sample requirements

Specific requirements for sample type(s), collection volumes, and sample shipping and handling should be established by the individual laboratory, and this information should be made readily available to referring physicians. In general, 1–2 ml of serum or plasma from whole blood collected in a sodium heparin (green top) or EDTA (purple top) tube, frozen urine, or CSF (free of blood contamination) are sufficient for LC-MS/MS- or GC-MS-based metabolite studies. A fibroblast culture can be established from a 3-mm skin punch, typically taken from the lateral upper thigh under sterile conditions. Fibroblasts can be cultured according to standard protocols. Leukocytes are extracted from 5–10 ml of blood collected in a sodium heparin (green top) or acid citrate dextrose (yellow top) tube and transformed into lymphoblasts according to standard protocols. Transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines should be used fresh and not stored. Isolation and analysis of DNA for molecular studies generally requires 1–2 ml of whole blood in an EDTA tube (purple top).

Conditions of sample shipping, handling, and storage

Plasma, urine, and CSF should be stored frozen (minimum −20 °C) and shipped on dry ice. Shipping of whole blood for biochemical analysis is not recommended. Blood for DNA analysis should be shipped to the laboratory at an ambient temperature within 24 h, or at 4 °C on cool packs if transport is delayed longer than 24 h after collection. Leukocyte pellets for DNA analysis should be stored frozen and shipped frozen on dry ice. Fibroblasts for enzyme or creatine transport measurements should be shipped in T-25 flasks filled with medium at room temperature. Whole blood collected for lymphoblast preparation should be transported at ambient temperature and, whenever possible, an overnight courier service should be used.

Method Validation

As with any clinical diagnostic test, assay performance should be validated by each individual laboratory to ensure reliability and to compensate for interlaboratory variations. As stipulated by the CLIA, these performance characteristics should be documented and verified on a regular basis.

LC-MS/MS and GC-MS are the most commonly employed techniques for measuring creatine metabolites. Calibration and quantification generally involve the use of isotope-labeled internal standards and purified synthetic standards for generating calibration curves. Products suitable for these purposes are commercially available, but reagents should be carefully prepared and validated prior to use. Note that creatine and creatinine undergo spontaneous interconversion over time; therefore, it is important to take steps to minimize and correct for this process to ensure accuracy. In general, the validation process for any quantitative instrumental method should include evaluation of assay performance in terms of linearity and the dynamic range of the assay (including lower and upper limits of quantification), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, reproducibility, stability, recovery, carryover, and any potential sources of interference. When performing mass spectrometry–based analyses of complex (i.e., unpurified) biological samples, it is important to evaluate the potential effects of ion suppression and cross-analyte interference.

As with metabolite-based methods, confirmatory enzymatic and molecular assays should also be validated to ensure acceptable test performance. Also see General Policies C7, “Levels of Development of a Diagnostic Test,” and C8, “Test Validation,” in the ACMG Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories, 2008 Edition, revised 02/2007 (https://www.acmg.net/acmg/Publications/Standards___Guidelines/General_Policies.aspx).

Reference ranges

For quantitative metabolite studies, it is recommended that laboratory-specific reference ranges for creatine, guanidinoacetate, and creatinine be determined for each sample type (plasma, urine, and/or CSF), using guidelines as defined by the laboratory’s policy and procedure for method validation (e.g., Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document EP28-A3c, “Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline—Third Edition”). Use of anonymized samples from a general patient population is also acceptable if those patients with an identified diagnosis are excluded. These ranges should be categorized by age, as appropriate, and updated on a regular basis. Establishing laboratory-specific reference ranges for affected individuals is more challenging because of the scarcity of patients, particularly in the case of AGAT deficiency, although it may be possible to obtain patient samples from other laboratories. An alternate approach to defining discrete, age-specific reference intervals is to use a continuous reference interval by age.52 While not optimal, in the absence of laboratory-specific data, several published reports describe ranges for affected individuals.38,53

Laboratory-specific ranges for normal and affected individuals (where available) should also be established for AGAT, GAMT, and CRTR enzyme activity assays. Again, samples from a suitably large control population should be analyzed to establish normative values, and samples from affected controls should be included in each assay for quality control (QC) purposes.

Testing personnel

Laboratory personnel who are performing tests for screening or diagnosis of creatine synthesis or transport disorders should be documented as having received appropriate training and as demonstrating competency in the performance of these methods. In addition, laboratory personnel should satisfy CLIA requirements for high-complexity testing and have, at a minimum, an associate degree in a laboratory science or medical laboratory technology from an accredited institution. More comprehensive requirements apply in some states.54 See General Policies B, “Personnel Policies,” in the ACMG Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories, 2008 Edition, Revised 02/2007 (https://www.acmg.net/acmg/Publications/Standards___Guidelines/Personnel_Policies.aspx).

Testing For CDSs

This section describes the diagnosis of CDSs by metabolite analysis, enzyme activity testing, and molecular sequencing.

Analysis of creatine, guanidinoacetate, and creatinine

Several methods have been described for the analysis of creatine, guanidinoacetate, and creatinine in plasma, urine, and CSF. Methods using stable isotope dilution mass spectrometry coupled with liquid or gas chromatography are the most commonly used and typically have a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. LC-MS/MS-based measurement of creatine and guanidinoacetate can be performed with55,56 or without derivatization.56,57 Although slightly less sensitive, the underivatized method allows for more rapid preparation of urine and plasma samples, and simultaneous detection of creatinine. Samples are first combined with a stable isotope-labeled internal standard; for plasma, this may be prepared in an organic solvent (e.g., acetonitrile) to facilitate deproteinization, or an organic solvent may be added sequentially after the internal standards. Clarified samples are then concentrated by drying under nitrogen and resuspended in the appropriate solvent for LC-MS/MS analysis. Urine generally does not require deproteinization per se; however, it is good practice to clarify these samples (via centrifugation and/or filtration) after addition of organic solvents to remove precipitated proteins in the case of proteinuria and other potential contaminants. For the derivatized method, samples are mixed with an organic solvent, dried, and then reconstituted in butanolic HCl and incubated at 65 °C for approximately 15 min. After a second nitrogen-drying step, the sample is reconstituted in a solvent matrix prior to analysis. For both preparation methods, the additional precaution of microfiltrating the samples before analysis by electrospray ionization–LC-MS/MS is recommended. Separation by hydrophilic or reverse-phase chromatography has been used to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of LC-MS/MS methods. Typically, analytes and the corresponding isotope-labeled internal standards are detected in the positive ion mode by the mass spectrometer using selected reaction monitoring, which also confers increased sensitivity and specificity.

Quantitative GC-MS analysis of creatine and guanidinoacetate is also a sensitive and specific approach but requires significantly more preparation time than does tandem mass spectrometry.56,58,59 A number of methods have been developed that utilize various derivatives and gas chromatography capillary columns of differing polarities, electron impact, or negative chemical ionization, and selected ion monitoring. Electron impact methods appear to have a sensitivity similar to that of older LC-MS/MS systems but may be less sensitive compared with more modern, higher-performing LC-MS/MS instruments. The electron impact methods use a two-step derivatization procedure using hexafluoroacetylacetone that stabilizes the guanidine group, followed by derivatization with N-methyl-N-tert-butyldimethylsilyltrifluoroacetamide to produce di(tert-butyldimethylsilyl) derivatives of the carboxylic acid moiety. These derivatives are analyzed using nonpolar columns (e.g., Supelco SPB-1). The negative chemical ionization method has greater sensitivity than electron impact methods and can measure the low concentrations of guanidinoacetate found in CSF.58 In this procedure, samples are also subjected to a two-step derivatization procedure with hexafluoroacetylacetone and pentafluorobenzoylbromide, and are analyzed on polar columns such as an SGE BPX-70 (70% cyanopropyl polysilphenylene-siloxane; Trajan Scientific).

Analyte concentrations are calculated by extrapolation from calibration curves constructed from the peak area ratio of the analyte to that of the internal standard plotted against the calibrator concentrations. Creatine and guanidinoacetate in urine are normalized to the creatinine concentration, which may be concurrently analyzed using underivatized LC-MS/MS methods or determined separately using routine methods. In this context, it is important to note that the Jaffé method, in which creatinine reacts with alkaline picrate to form a complex absorbing at 480–520 nm, is still commonly used to determine creatinine, despite well-recognized interference by bilirubin, protein, ketones, ketoacids, fatty acids, and some drugs.60 Therefore, the Jaffé method can give false-negative results in plasma when investigating low creatinine levels, which provides a diagnostic clue for AGAT and GAMT deficiencies.61 Thus, creatinine determination in plasma should not be relied on as a screening method for these disorders.

QC for analyte assays

Comprehensive QC guidelines for quantitative assays are available from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. In general, each batch of patient tests should include at least two levels of quality control, ideally consisting of the appropriate sample type (plasma, urine, or CSF). A target concentration for each analyte and tolerances for error should be established by analysis of replicate QC samples (ideally 20 or more) over multiple days, ideally by more than one operator. For example, in order to obtain appropriate normal and pathologic concentrations of creatine and related metabolites, one approach would be to utilize a low-level QC at approximately twice the concentrations of the lowest calibrator, and a high-level QC at 75% of the upper calibrator. Examples of other recommended QC options include samples with concentrations at approximately the midpoint of the calibration range or, if a dilution protocol is used, an identical dilution of the high QC using the same protocol.

Measurement of AGAT, GAMT, and CRTR activities

AGAT enzyme activity can be determined in lymphoblasts by measuring the formation of guanidinoacetate from isotopically labeled glycine and arginine.38

The activity of GAMT can be determined in fibroblasts, lymphoblasts, and amniocytes via the formation of creatine from radioactive or stable isotope-labeled guanidinoacetate.38,62 For CRTR activity, the transport of radioactive isotope-labeled creatine is measured in fibroblasts. Affected patients have <10% normal activity. This assay may not detect female carriers since transport activity depends on the random inactivation of the X chromosome carrying the pathogenic variant or normal allele.39 As is typical for enzyme assays, positive (affected) and normal (unaffected) controls should be included in each batch as a QC measure.

Molecular sequence analysis of GATM, GAMT, and SLC6A8 genes

General recommendations regarding sample collection, analysis, interpretation, and QC of molecular studies is provided by the American College of Medical Genetics Standards Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories, Part G (Clinical Molecular Genetics), available at https://www.acmg.net/StaticContent/SGs/Section_G_2010.pdf.

Proficiency testing

Documented participation in ongoing proficiency testing activities is an important element of any laboratory quality assurance program. For relatively rare tests, like those for CDSs, a regular interlaboratory comparison program can be helpful in terms of both qualitative and quantitative performance. In addition, the European Research Network for Evaluation and Improvement of Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment of Inherited Disorders of Metabolism provides a commercially available, external proficiency testing service for the quantitative analysis of creatine, guanidinoacetate, and creatinine in serum and urine.

Test Interpretation and Reporting

Interpretation

Test results, including raw analytical data, should be reviewed carefully and in the appropriate clinical context (when available). True CDS cases (particularly biosynthesis disorders) are generally recognizable based on significant and unique deviations in analyte levels (especially guanidinoacetate and, to a lesser extent, creatine) compared with controls (Table 1). Samples from patients with AGAT deficiency typically have extremely low, almost undetectable concentrations of guanidinoacetate. Cases of GAMT deficiency are generally characterized by greatly increased guanidinoacetate concentrations (20–30 times that of controls),63 although these levels may vary; hence, repeat analysis is recommended in situations involving moderate elevations (unpublished observations). Note that guanidinoacetate concentrations tend to be significantly lower in patients taking creatine and ornithine supplements, consistent with the negative regulatory effect imposed by these compounds on AGAT activity. Consistent with magnetic resonance spectroscopy findings, CSF creatine concentrations have been reported to be low in GAMT deficiency,64,65,66 and are expected to be low in AGAT deficiency. In CRTR deficiency, creatine concentrations in CSF are normal to mildly elevated, suggesting that creatine in the brain is lost because of a reuptake failure.29 In general, specific enzyme activity assays and/or DNA testing should be used to confirm biochemical (metabolite) findings.

CRTR deficiency is the most common CDS and can be the most challenging to diagnose. Plasma creatine levels are generally unreliable indicators of CRTR status, as they may be elevated or normal in affected patients. Male patients with this disorder typically have significantly increased ratios of creatine to creatinine in urine (often >2; normal is generally <1).67 However, this ratio may be elevated or normal in heterozygous CRTR females. Individuals with myopathy and/or low muscle mass may also have increased urinary creatine levels,27,68 while inconsistent findings have been reported for patients with various kidney disorders.27 Urinary creatine levels can also be significantly elevated in postprandial samples, particularly after consumption of meat or fish. Creatine is also a popular and readily available dietary supplement, although this consideration is obviously more important in older patients. Confounders for CDS disorders include ornithine aminotransferase deficiency and the hyperammonemia, hyperornithinemia, homocitrullinuria syndrome, which have been reported to cause secondary creatine deficiency.33 Guanidinoacetate can be elevated in patients with urea cycle defects such as arginase deficiency, although creatine concentrations tend to be normal or mildly elevated in this situation.69,70 While not a CDS indicator, it is worth noting that elevated creatine in plasma has been suggested as a potential biomarker for mitochondrial disorders.71,72

In general, the use of creatinine as a biomarker for the diagnosis of CDSs (aside from the creatine-to-creatinine ratio for CRTR deficiency) is of limited value. While levels in plasma and urine may be low in AGAT or GAMT deficiency, they may also be normal and are usually low in patients with low muscle mass. Regardless of the cause, low urinary creatinine concentrations are sometimes revealed due to inaccurate normalization for urinary organic or amino acid analysis, which results in apparent generalized elevations of these compounds.

Reporting

Reports should contain appropriate patient and specimen information, as described in the American College of Medical Genetics Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories, Sections 2.4, 2.41, and 2.42(https://www.acmg.net/acmg/Publications/Standards___Guidelines/General_Policies.aspx) and as specified by CLIA. Written reports should provide units of measure; age-dependent, laboratory-specific reference ranges; and an interpretation. When abnormal results are detected, the interpretation should include an overview of the results and their significance, a correlation to any available clinical information, elements of a differential diagnosis, recommendations for additional biochemical testing and any available confirmatory studies (e.g., enzyme assay, molecular analysis), and a phone number to reach the reporting laboratory for additional questions. Recommendations for follow-up evaluation, including referral to a metabolic specialist, should also be included when appropriate.

Disclosure

S.Y. and N.L. serve on the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Association for Creatine Deficiencies, and N.L. is on the Scientific Advisory Board and receives research funding from Lumos Pharma. J.D.S., N.L., S.T., M.M.C.W., and S.Y. are associated with clinical biochemical genetics laboratories that perform diagnostic testing for creatine deficiency syndromes. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.

    , Cerebral creatine deficiencies: a group of treatable intellectual developmental disorders. Semin Neurol 2014;34:350–356.

  2. 2.

    , Pre-symptomatic treatment of creatine biosynthesis defects. Subcell Biochem 2007;46:167–181.

  3. 3.

    , , , et al. Developmental progress and creatine restoration upon long-term creatine supplementation of a patient with arginine:glycine amidinotransferase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab 2012;106:48–54.

  4. 4.

    , , , et al. Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency: outcomes in 48 individuals and recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Mol Genet Metab 2014;111:16–25.

  5. 5.

    , , , , , Evidence-based treatment of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency. Mol Genet Metab 2013;110:255–262.

  6. 6.

    , , , , , Searching for a therapy of creatine transporter deficiency: some effects of creatine ethyl ester in brain slices in vitro. Neuroscience 2011;199:386–393.

  7. 7.

    , , , et al. The creatine transporter mediates the uptake of creatine by brain tissue, but not the uptake of two creatine-derived compounds. Neuroscience 2006;142:991–997.

  8. 8.

    , , , , , In vivo neuroprotection by a creatine-derived compound: phosphocreatine-Mg-complex acetate. Brain Res 2009;1285:158–163.

  9. 9.

    , , , et al. Response to creatine analogs in fibroblasts and patients with creatine transporter deficiency. Mol Genet Metab 2010;99:296–299.

  10. 10.

    , , , et al. Cyclocreatine treatment improves cognition in mice with creatine transporter deficiency. J Clin Invest 2012;122:2837–2846.

  11. 11.

    , , , , , Synthesis and biological evaluation of new creatine fatty esters revealed dodecyl creatine ester as a promising drug candidate for the treatment of the creatine transporter deficiency. J Med Chem 2013;56:5173–5181.

  12. 12.

    , , , et al. Effects of amide creatine derivatives in brain hippocampal slices, and their possible usefulness for curing creatine transporter deficiency. Neurochem Res 2014;39:37–45.

  13. 13.

    Creatine: biosynthesis, regulation, and function. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 1979;50:177–242.

  14. 14.

    , , Creatine and creatine deficiency syndromes: biochemical and clinical aspects. Pediatr Neurol 2010;42:163–171.

  15. 15.

    Estimating glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1017–1019.

  16. 16.

    , , The creatine kinase system and pleiotropic effects of creatine. Amino Acids 2011;40:1271–1296.

  17. 17.

    , , , et al. Local ATP generation by brain-type creatine kinase (CK-B) facilitates cell motility. PLoS One 2009;4:e5030.

  18. 18.

    , , , , Exocytotic release of creatine in rat brain. Synapse 2006;60:118–123.

  19. 19.

    , , , New insights into creatine transporter deficiency: the importance of recycling creatine in the brain. J Inherit Metab Dis 2013;36:155–156.

  20. 20.

    , , Na(+)/Cl(−)/creatine transporter activity and expression in rat brain synaptosomes. Neuroscience 2010;165:53–60.

  21. 21.

    , , Structure and reaction mechanism of L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase. Biol Chem 1997;378:193–197.

  22. 22.

    , , , et al. Arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT) deficiency: clinical features and long term outcomes in 16 patients diagnosed worldwide. Mol Genet Metab 2015;116:252–259.

  23. 23.

    , , , et al. Thirteen new patients with guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency and functional characterization of nineteen novel missense variants in the GAMT gene. Hum Mutat 2014;35:462–469.

  24. 24.

    , , , Creatine deficiency syndromes and the importance of creatine synthesis in the brain. Amino Acids 2011;40:1315–1324.

  25. 25.

    , A Na(+)-dependent creatine transporter in rabbit brain, muscle, heart, and kidney. cDNA cloning and functional expression. J Biol Chem 1993;268:8418–8421.

  26. 26.

    , , Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding a novel member of the human brain GABA/noradrenaline neurotransmitter transporter family. Gene 1995;159:287–288.

  27. 27.

    , Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev 2000;80:1107–1213.

  28. 28.

    , , , et al. Characterization of novel SLC6A8 variants with the use of splice-site analysis tools and implementation of a newly developed LOVD database. Eur J Hum Genet 2011;19:56–63.

  29. 29.

    , , , et al. Phenotype and genotype in 101 males with X-linked creatine transporter deficiency. J Med Genet 2013;50:463–472.

  30. 30.

    , , , et al. Creatine deficiency syndrome. A treatable myopathy due to arginine-glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT) deficiency. Neuromuscul Disord 2013;23:670–674.

  31. 31.

    , , , et al. Treatment of intractable epilepsy in a female with SLC6A8 deficiency. Mol Genet Metab 2010;101:409–412.

  32. 32.

    , , , et al. Clinical features and X-inactivation in females heterozygous for creatine transporter defect. Clin Genet 2011;79:264–272.

  33. 33.

    , , , et al. Treatment by oral creatine, L-arginine and L-glycine in six severely affected patients with creatine transporter defect. J Inherit Metab Dis 2012;35:151–157.

  34. 34.

    , , , et al. Low creatinine: the diagnostic clue for a treatable neurologic disorder. Neurology 2009;72:854–855.

  35. 35.

    , , , et al. Feasibility of newborn screening for guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis 2014;37:231–236.

  36. 36.

    , , , et al. Creatine transporter deficiency: prevalence among patients with mental retardation and pitfalls in metabolite screening. Clin Biochem 2007;40:1328–1331.

  37. 37.

    , , , et al. Biochemical, molecular, and clinical diagnoses of patients with cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes. Mol Genet Metab 2013;109:260–268.

  38. 38.

    , , Laboratory diagnosis of defects of creatine biosynthesis and transport. Clin Chim Acta 2005;361:1–9.

  39. 39.

    , , , Creatine transporter deficiency in two half-brothers. Am J Med Genet A 2010;152A:1979–1983.

  40. 40.

    , , , et al. Detection of a novel intragenic rearrangement in the creatine transporter gene by next generation sequencing. Mol Genet Metab 2013;110:465–471.

  41. 41.

    , , , et al. A pilot study to estimate incidence of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency in newborns by direct sequencing of the GAMT gene. Gene 2016;575:127–131.

  42. 42.

    , , , et al. Arginine:glycine amidinotransferase deficiency: the third inborn error of creatine metabolism in humans. Am J Hum Genet 2001;69:1127–1133.

  43. 43.

    , , , et al. Creatine depletion in a new case with AGAT deficiency: clinical and genetic study in a large pedigree. Mol Genet Metab 2002;77:326–331.

  44. 44.

    , , , et al. Arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT) deficiency in a newborn: early treatment can prevent phenotypic expression of the disease. J Pediatr 2006;148:828–830.

  45. 45.

    , , , et al. l-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT) deficiency: clinical presentation and response to treatment in two patients with a novel mutation. Mol Genet Metab 2010;101:228–232.

  46. 46.

    Arginine:glycine amidinotransferase deficiency: a treatable metabolic encephalomyopathy. Neurology 2010;75:186–188.

  47. 47.

    , , , et al. Screening for X-linked creatine transporter (SLC6A8) deficiency via simultaneous determination of urinary creatine to creatinine ratio by tandem mass-spectrometry. Mol Genet Metab 2009;96:273–275.

  48. 48.

    , , , et al. High prevalence of SLC6A8 deficiency in X-linked mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet 2004;75:97–105.

  49. 49.

    , , , et al. The screening of SLC6A8 deficiency among Estonian families with X-linked mental retardation. J Inherit Metab Dis 2010;33 Suppl 3:S5–11.

  50. 50.

    , , , , Incidence of brain creatine transporter deficiency in males with developmental delay referred for brain magnetic resonance imaging. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2005;26:276–282.

  51. 51.

    , , , et al. Quantitative determination of guanidinoacetate and creatine in dried blood spot by flow injection analysis-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta 2006;364:180–187.

  52. 52.

    , , , et al. Continuous age- and sex-adjusted reference intervals of urinary markers for cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes: a novel approach to the definition of reference intervals. Clin Chem 2015;61:760–768.

  53. 53.

    , , , et al. Screening for primary creatine deficiencies in French patients with unexplained neurological symptoms. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012;7:96.

  54. 54.

    , , ; Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Technical standards and guidelines for the diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency. Genet Med 2010;12:464–470.

  55. 55.

    , , , , Analysis of guanidinoacetate and creatine by isotope dilution electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta 2001;308:173–178.

  56. 56.

    , , Quantification of creatine and guanidinoacetate using GC-MS and LC-MS/MS for the detection of cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2007;Chapter 17:Unit 17.3.

  57. 57.

    , , , Simultaneous determination of guanidinoacetate, creatine and creatinine in urine and plasma by un-derivatized liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ann Clin Biochem 2008;45(Pt 6):575–584.

  58. 58.

    , , , , , An accurate stable isotope dilution gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric approach to the diagnosis of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency. J Pharm Biomed Anal 1998;18:659–665.

  59. 59.

    , , , , Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry assay for arginine: glycine-amidinotransferase deficiency. Anal Biochem 2005;343:356–358.

  60. 60.

    Analytical reviews in clinical biochemistry: the estimation of creatinine. Ann Clin Biochem 1986;23 (Pt 1):1–25.

  61. 61.

    , , , , , Plasma creatinine assessment in creatine deficiency: A diagnostic pitfall. J Inherit Metab Dis 2000;23:835–840.

  62. 62.

    , , Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency: non-invasive enzymatic diagnosis of a newly recognized inborn error of metabolism. Clin Chim Acta 2000;290:179–188.

  63. 63.

    , , , et al. GAMT deficiency: features, treatment, and outcome in an inborn error of creatine synthesis. Neurology 2006;67:480–484.

  64. 64.

    , , , et al. Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: differences of creatine uptake in human brain and muscle. Mol Genet Metab 2004;82:208–213.

  65. 65.

    , , , et al. Creatine deficiency syndrome caused by guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: diagnostic tools for a new inborn error of metabolism. J Pediatr 1997;131:626–631.

  66. 66.

    , , , et al. Lack of creatine in muscle and brain in an adult with GAMT deficiency. Ann Neurol 2003;53:248–251.

  67. 67.

    , , , et al. Creatine and guanidinoacetate: diagnostic markers for inborn errors in creatine biosynthesis and transport. Mol Genet Metab 2004;82:214–219.

  68. 68.

    , A study of creatine metabolism in diseases causing muscle wasting. J Clin Invest 1964;43:444–452.

  69. 69.

    , , , et al. Creatine metabolism in urea cycle defects. J Inherit Metab Dis 2012;35:647–653.

  70. 70.

    , , Treatment of arginase deficiency revisited: guanidinoacetate as a therapeutic target and biomarker for therapeutic monitoring. Dev Med Child Neurol 2014;56:1021–1024.

  71. 71.

    , , , et al. A plasma signature of human mitochondrial disease revealed through metabolic profiling of spent media from cultured muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:1571–1575.

  72. 72.

    , , , , Role of creatine as biomarker of mitochondrial diseases. Mol Genet Metab 2013;108:119–124.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Marzia Pasquali and members of the ACMG Biochemical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Subcommittee for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

    • J. Daniel Sharer
  2. Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    • Olaf Bodamer
  3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

    • Nicola Longo
  4. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

    • Silvia Tortorelli
  5. Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

    • Silvia Tortorelli
  6. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Metabolic Unit, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    • Mirjam M.C. Wamelink
  7. Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA

    • Sarah Young

Authors

  1. Search for J. Daniel Sharer in:

  2. Search for Olaf Bodamer in:

  3. Search for Nicola Longo in:

  4. Search for Silvia Tortorelli in:

  5. Search for Mirjam M.C. Wamelink in:

  6. Search for Sarah Young in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Daniel Sharer.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.203

Further reading