Introduction

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) has replaced penetrating keratoplasty as the procedure of choice in surgical management of eyes with diseases affecting the corneal stroma and affecting sight such as scars, dystrophy or ectasia. The big bubble (BB) technique1 is the most popular technique wherein air is injected in the corneal stroma to separate either the Descemet’s membrane (DM) or the DM together with a layer of deep corneal stroma termed the pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer–DL). This allows excision of the affected stroma and recipient epithelium and replacement with healthy stroma and epithelium from a cadaver donor.

When air is injected in the corneal stroma, it either cleaves the DL from the deep stroma to create a big bubble termed type-1 or it accesses the plane between DM and DL to create a thin walled bubble termed type-2. The wall of a type-1 BB is made of DL and DM, while that of a type-2 BB is made of DM alone and is more vulnerable to major tears or bursting during surgery. Often during injection of air, tiny bubbles escape from the peripheral cornea, in the vicinity of the trabecular meshwork, into the anterior chamber and can cause post-operative raised intraocular pressure.2, 3, 4

Dua et al5 have reported that DL is a strong and resilient layer with bursting pressure 1.45 bars. On the basis of the above information, Zaki AA et al6 described a combination of DALK with phacoemulsification and lens implant, termed the DALK-Triple procedure. When confronted with patients requiring DALK, who also had dense cataracts, they were able to perform cataract surgery under the exposed DL of a type-1 BB. They reported that DL could withstand all pressure fluctuations associated with the phacoemulsification procedure, and that, despite stromal scarring requiring keratoplasty, the DL was remarkably clear in most cases.6 In one instance, they attempted DALK-Triple under the DM (type-2 BB), which burst promptly during injection of viscoelastic in the anterior chamber.

In this study, we report the pressure and volume of air required to create the BB, the volume and pressure of air in the type-1 BB and the bursting pressure of the type-1 BB.

Materials and methods

Tissue samples

Twenty-two human sclera-corneal discs from eye bank donor eyes that were not suitable for transplantation were used. The sclera-corneal discs were maintained in organ culture in Eagle’s minimum essential medium with 2% foetal bovine serum for 4–8 weeks post-mortem. Donor details are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Donor details for the sclera-corneal discs used in the experiments

Experiment to measure pressure

Air injection

The sclera-corneal disc was placed endothelial side up in a petri dish and kept moist with balanced salt solution. In fifteen samples, under an operating microscope, a 30 gauge needle, bent to an angle of 135°, bevel up, attached to a 20 ml syringe was passed from the scleral rim into the corneal stroma and advanced to the centre of the disc. The needle was passed close to the endothelial surface without perforating it. Air was injected with force to overcome the tissue resistance, until a big bubble was formed. The type of the bubble was determined, type-1 or type-2. The position of the needle tip was kept constant in the centre of the sclera-corneal disc in mid stroma.

Pressure measurement

An electronic pressure gauge/converter device was used (Keller, K-114, Winterthur, Switzerland). The tube from the device was linked to the side arm of a three-way cannula attached between the syringe and needle. The injecting needle was attached to the front end of the cannula and a 20 ml syringe to the other end. The device was also connected to a personal computer (PC) via a USB port. The USB link also powered the device. Pressure readings were recorded in real time and transmitted as serial RS485 half-duplex signals to the PC, where the pressure was displayed as a continuous trace on the screen by the software associated with the K-114 device. (Figure 1) The pressure recorded was that in the syringe during injection of air. In validation experiments, when the needle was not inserted in tissue and the piston was advanced rapidly, the pressure recorded was between 0 and 1, indicating that the resistance offered by the needle was not relevant to the pressures measured (data not shown).

Figure 1
figure 1

(a) Pressure converter system K-144, (b) Real pressure record over time (red graph), the temperature of the pressure sensor (blue graph), the maximum pressure (pink graph), the minus pressure (green line). A full colour version of this figure is available at the Eye journal online.

The maximum pressure required to create the bubble was recorded. The plunger was then released and allowed to attain a stable position. The needle tip was advanced to lie inside the BB and the bubble inflated till its wall was taut. The pressure recorded at this point was taken as the base line intrabubble pressure. With the needle tip in the BB, the piston was pushed further with force until the BB burst. This recorded the bursting pressure of the bubble (Figures 2a and b).

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) Pressure change over time (red line) in T1BB. (b) Pressure change over time (red line) in T2BB.

Experiment to measure volume

As air leaked through multiple points along the circumference of the corneal periphery, a clamp was designed to block the holes and stop air leak. In seven samples, the sclera-corneal discs were clamped in a circular clamp of 10 mm diameter that prevented air escape from the periphery. A 30 gauge needle attached to a 1 ml syringe (internal diameter 5 mm) filled with air was passed into the corneal stroma from the scleral rim as described above. During injection, the maximum compression of air (position of piston) at the time air just started to appear in the corneal stroma was recorded. The piston was held in place until a type-1 BB was formed. The pressure on the piston was released and piston was allowed to reverse to a stable position. The volume of air lost in the cornea was ascertained from the final position of the piston. The BB diameter was measured with a pair of surgical callipers. The needle was then advanced into the BB and all the air aspirated until the BB had completely collapsed. This provided a measure of the volume of air in the big bubble. The pressure (above atmosphere) in the syringe at the point where air started to emerge in the tissue from the needle tip was deduced by the formula P1V1=P2V2, where P1 is the initial pressure (atmospheric) and V1 the initial volume (1 ml), and P2 is the final pressure (unknown) and V2 the final volume (mean 0.54 ml, see results).

Results

The average age of donors was 66 years (range; 52–80 years). There were 15 females and 7 males.

Pressure measurements

Twelve type-1 and 3 type-2 BB were obtained (Table 2). The mean pressure attained to create a BB was 96.25+/− 21.61 kpa (range 90–130 kpa). For type-1 BB, the mean intrabubble pressure was 10.16 +/− 3.65 kpa (range 5.2–18 kpa) and the bursting pressure was 66.65 +/− 18.65kpa (range 40–110kpa). The median bursting pressure was 68.5 kpa (Table 2). Accurate measurements of type-2 BB could not be obtained as when advancing the needle into the bubble cavity, while the needle was still in the stroma, the type-2 BB burst in one case and the DM disinserted (separated along its peripheral attachment to the stroma) in one sector before the bubble could be inflated enough to make the DM taut. The mean pressure at the time of the type-2 BB burst/disinserted was 14.77 +/− 2.44 kpa (range 12.0–17.0 kpa) (Table 2).

Table 2 Measurements of the big bubble

Volume measurements

In the bubble volume experiment, the maximum compression of air required to create type-1 BB was 0.54 +/− 0.07 ml (range 0.5–0.7 ml), the volume of air lost in the cornea was 0.38 +/− 0.06 ml (range 0.3–0.5 ml) and the average volume of the BB was 0.1 ml. The mean pressure in the syringe at which air started to emerge in the tissue, as calculated from the volume compression, was 131.82+/− 50.58 kpa (range 101.28–236.3 kpa above atmosphere). The difference in pressures measured directly with the gauge and by this method were not statistically significant (P=0.25) (Figure 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Compares the pressure calculated from the volume compression of the syringe and that measured directly with gauge (P=0.25).

Statistical methods

The data was normally distributed as confirmed by Levene’s test. Statistical analysis between two groups was performed by the unpaired student t-test using Graphpad prism version 5.0. (Graphpad software, La Jolla, CA, USA). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Discussion

In DALK by the BB technique, when air is injected in the corneal stroma, a type-1 BB forms by air cleaving in the plane of deep stroma and DL, with a posterior displacement of DL and DM. The cleavage and displacement are related to the pressure of air in the corneal stroma and in the BB. As the BB expands posteriorly, the intrabubble pressure is countered by the intraocular pressure, which can rise up to 70 mm of mercury (authors’ unpublished observations). This counter pressure and the closed space within which the BB expands limits the posterior expansion of the BB in the eye thus rupture of a type-1 BB during inflation is unlikely and has not been reported. However, when the type-1 BB is deflated and the corneal stroma anterior to it is removed, the DL+DM bulge anteriorly to assume a convex dome shape. Any pressure applied to the DL+DM from within the eye, as during the DALK-triple procedure, would cause the layers to expand outward, into the atmosphere and theoretically reach a bursting point. In this study, we set out to ascertain the minimum and mean popping (bursting) pressure of the layers to establish whether it would always be safe to perform cataract surgery under DL+DM after creating a type-1 BB.

The pressure converter K-114 allowed us to measure in real time the pressure at the tip of the needle during the creation of a BB. On initiation of injection, air is compressed in the syringe on account of the tissue resistance offered by the corneal stroma at the site of the tip of the needle. Once this is overcome, air starts to enter the stroma separating the lamellae, and the intrastromal pressure builds up as the cornea gets completely aerated. At a critical tissue pressure, the air forces its way to the plane anterior to DL and cleaves this away from deep stroma as a type-1 BB. The volume of air required to achieve the critical tissue pressure depends on the escape of air through the trabecular meshwork or through distinct peripheral holes in the stroma, during injection.7, 8, 9 This confounder was eliminated by the use of the clamp, which prevented any escape of air, thus giving us an accurate measure of the mean tissue pressure required to create a BB overcoming tissue resistance, which was 96.25 +/− 21.61 kpa. It has been recently demonstrated that air injected in the corneal stroma follows a consistent path regardless of the location, direction of bevel, and depth of the needle tip in the stroma.9

Once a type-1 BB was created, the intrabubble pressure was ascertained by advancing the needle into the cavity of the BB. This measured 10.16 +/− 3.65 kpa. In the ex vivo situation of this study, it was possible to expand the type-1 BB to its bursting point by continued forceful injection of air with the needle positioned in the cavity of the bubble. This situation would simulate increased intraocular pressure exerted on the layers during phacoemulsification carried out under the layers (DALK-triple). The lowest pressure at which a type-1 BB burst was 40 kpa and the highest was 110 kpa. The mean bursting pressure was 66.65 +/− 18.65 kpa. Although we reported the bursting pressure in our original paper,5 we refined the measurement by placing the needle tip in the type-1 BB while increasing the pressure to the bursting point. This approach eliminated any variations induced by the resistance of the stroma to the passage of air. Any effect of variable leakage of air from the periphery of the sclera-corneal disc was prevented by the use of the clamp. In addition, the accuracy of the measurements was enhanced by using the continuous digital pressure recording device.

A number of studies have reported the variations in intraocular pressure during phacoemulsification. By direct measurements during surgery, Zhao Y et al10 found that the IOP fluctuated from 13–96 mm Hg (1.8–13.5 kpa). Khng C et al stated that IOP exceeded 60 mm Hg (8.4 kpa) and the highest IOP occurred during hydro-dissection, viscoelastic injection and intraocular lens insertion.11 Vasavada V et al compared the impact of different fluidic parameters on intraoperative IOP and found that the minimum IOP in the low and high parameters groups was 35 mm Hg (4.9 kpa) and 34.5 mm Hg (4.8 kpa), respectively, and the maximum IOP in the low and high parameters groups was 69 (9.7 kpa) and 85 (11.9 kpa) mm Hg respectively.12 In another study, Kamae KK et al13 monitored IOP during IOL implantation and found that the mean and peak IOPs exceeded 60 mm Hg (8.4 kpa) during IOL implantation. In comparison, the data on bursting pressure of the DL+DM generated in this study show that the pressures attained during cataract surgery are several times less than what is required to burst the layers under which phacoemulsification can be carried out in the DALK-triple procedure. Even the lowest bursting pressure had a safety margin of over 25 kpa (177.5 mm Hg) compared to the highest pressure reached during phacoemulsification. This would indicate that DALK-triple is a viable option with regard to the risk of inadvertent rupture of the DL+DM layers intraoperatively.

When cataract and DALK surgery are required simultaneously, if the cornea is clear, one could consider performing phacoemulsificaton as the first step and DALK as the second step of the same procedure. However, when the cornea is scarred to an extent that visualisation is poor, a triple-DALK would be the preferred option. With triple-DALK, when air injection fails to produce a type-1 BB, manual dissection allows access to the plane between the deep stroma and DL. Once the opaque cornea, related to the aeration of the stroma anterior to the DL, is removed, the transparent DL allows phacoemusification to be carried out.

We were able to create both type-1 and type-2 BB, as reported by Dua et al; however, the type-1 BB was more consistent, occurring in 86.4% of the 22 sclera-corneal discs. The data provided in this study can help us develop an automated system whereby we can produce big bubbles in vivo with improved consistency.