To highlight the clinical and surgical considerations in treating patients with apparent recurrent acute dacryocystitis with a patent lacrimal system.
Three children referred to a tertiary unit as recurrent acute dacryocystitis were reviewed retrospectively. Imaging and subsequent surgical intervention revealed the underlying diagnosis.
All three cases presented with recurrent abscesses in the region of the lacrimal sac that failed to respond to incision and drainage. The lesions were lower and more lateral to the usual location of a sac abscess and closer to the inferior orbital rim. All three cases were found to have patent lacrimal systems on syringing, and all were found to have infected, low-lying, anteriorly placed aberrant ethmoid air cells on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. These were confirmed on subsequent surgical exploration.
Infected low-lying ethmoid air cells can mimic dacryocystitis with recurrent abcesses. In cases where a patent nasolacrimal system is demonstrated and a more inferolateral location of the swelling than would be expected in dacryocystitis is seen, imaging is warranted to ensure the appropriate intervention is undertaken. Anterior ethmoidectomy as opposed to dacryocystorhinostomy is the appropriate treatment in these cases.
Dacryocystitis usually presents secondary to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Spread of inflammation from infected ethmoid air cells to the adjoining tissues can rarely mimic acute dacryocystitis in patients with a patent nasolacrimal system.1, 2 We report three cases with clinically diagnosed recurrent dacryocystitis whose nasolacrimal system was shown to be patent. The underlying diagnosis was revealed to be infected low-lying anterior ethmoid air cells on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These were confirmed on subsequent surgical exploration.
LA, a 16-month-old girl, presented with suspected recurrent right-sided acute dacryocystitis with associated abscess. The abscess was initially treated with oral and topical antibiotics, and spontaneously ruptured, though did not fully resolve (Figures 1a and b). Subsequent examination under anaesthesia showed a patent nasolacrimal system on probing. The remaining cyst wall and surrounding granulation tissue were excised (Figure 1c). Rapid recurrence of three further abscesses occurred at same site, progressing to rupture within 48–72 h. CT scans revealed the presence of infected, anteriorly placed aberrant ethmoid air cells as the origin of the abscess tract (Figures 1d and e). Further incision and curettage, and removal of the mucosal lining by anterior ethmoidectomy at the site revealed a cavity extending to the bony orbital rim with no communication to the nasal cavity.
EW presented at 2 weeks of age with conjunctivitis. She subsequently developed an erythematous right lower lid swelling inferolateral to the sac region at 2 months of age and was treated with intravenous antibiotics for preseptal cellulitis. At 7 months of age, she was referred to us with the diagnosis of recurrent dacryocystitis (Figures 2a and b). Clinically, the abscess appeared lower on the lid than expected and the nasolacrimal duct was patent on probing. Incision and drainage was undertaken, but the abscess rapidly recurred. MRI head and CT scan of sinuses showed a collection adjoining the lacrimal sac (Figures 2d–f). Surgical exploration revealed a mucosal-lined collection, which was marsupialised, and monocanalicular intubation performed. Nasoendoscopic anterior ethmoidectomy was performed at the same time. This resulted in clinical improvement with no recurrence at 6 months follow-up (Figure 2c).
EK presented at the age of four years with history of dacryocystitis with an associated recurring abscess inferolateral to the sac (Figure 3a). The abscess did not respond adequately to multiple courses of oral antibiotics and spontaneously discharged on one occasion. There was no history of epiphora, and syringing showed the nasolacrimal system to be patent. MRI and CT images showed opacification of the anterior, middle, and posterior ethmoid air cells together with inflammation spreading to the region of the nasolacrimal duct (Figures 3b and c). The lacrimal system was patent, and an anterior ethmoidectomy was performed, resulting in complete resolution.
Infected anteriorly placed ethmoid air cells can cause recurrent abscesses or extrinsic compression of the lacrimal system, and mimic dacryocystitis. A significant number of failed dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) cases have been shown to have ethmoidal abnormalities suggesting that the occurrence of ethmoidal pathology mimicking or causing acute dacryocystitis may be common.3 In cases where a patent nasolacrimal system is demonstrated and a more inferolateral swelling is seen than would be expected in dacryocystitis, imaging is necessary to ensure the appropriate intervention is undertaken. Anterior ethmoidectomy as opposed to DCR is the appropriate treatment in these cases.
Yazici B, Yazici Z . Pseudodacryocystitis and nasolacrimal duct obstruction secondary to ethmoiditis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 26 (5): 381–383.
Remulla HD, Rubin PA, Shore JW, Cunningham MJ . Pseudodacryocystitis arising from anterior ethmoiditis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 11 (3): 165–168.
Liang J, Hur K, Merbs SL, Lane AP . Surgical and anatomic considerations in endoscopic revision of failed external dacryocystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 150 (5): 901–905.
The study was supported by ophthalmology and radiology department in Birmingham Children’s Hospital and ophthalmology department in The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital.
This material is original research that has not been previously published and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Mohite, A., Jenyon, T., Manoj, B. et al. Pseudodacryocystitis: paediatric case series of infected atypical ethmoid air cells masquerading as recurrent dacryocystitis. Eye 31, 657–660 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.282