Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Dementia of the eye: the role of amyloid beta in retinal degeneration

Subjects

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the most common causes of irreversible blindness affecting nearly 50 million individuals globally. The disease is characterised by progressive loss of central vision, which has significant implications for quality of life concerns in an increasingly ageing population. AMD pathology manifests in the macula, a specialised region of the retina, which is responsible for central vision and perception of fine details. The underlying pathology of this complex degenerative disease is incompletely understood but includes both genetic as well as epigenetic risk factors. The recent discovery that amyloid beta (Aβ), a highly toxic and aggregate-prone family of peptides, is elevated in the ageing retina and is associated with AMD has opened up new perspectives on the aetiology of this debilitating blinding disease. Multiple studies now link Aβ with key stages of AMD progression, which is both exciting and potentially insightful, as this identifies a well-established toxic agent that aggressively targets cells in degenerative brains. Here, we review the most recent findings supporting the hypothesis that Aβ may be a key factor in AMD pathology. We describe how multiple Aβ reservoirs, now reported in the ageing eye, may target the cellular physiology of the retina as well as associated layers, and propose a mechanistic pathway of Aβ-mediated degenerative change leading to AMD.

Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a complex ocular disorder affecting a critical region of the retina known as the macula, which is crucial for central vision and perception of fine detail. The disease is the primary cause of irreversible blindness in societies with demographics favouring increasing age. The aetiology of this degenerative disorder is poorly understood, but contains both genetic as well as environmental risk factors.1, 2, 3 Central to degenerative pathology is the loss of visual function, which is associated with atrophy of photoreceptors and the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) that forms the blood–retinal barrier.4, 5 Retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and the RPE monolayer were recently identified as a major source of amyloid beta (Aβ) synthesis and secretion in the posterior eye.6 Aβ is a remarkably penetrative and highly toxic protein that aggressively targets neurons and is a key feature of neurodegenerative disease.7, 8 In the eye, multiple Aβ reservoirs were discovered in the retinal environment, while elevated Aβ levels were found in the ageing retina and linked with key stages of AMD progression.6 These findings support the hypothesis that Aβ has a crucial though previously uncharacterised role in driving degenerative processes in the ageing macula.

Here, we bring together the most recent findings emerging from the literature investigating AMD, neurodegeneration, as well as Aβ-structural biology, which support our hypothesis, and offer insights into fundamental degenerative events that could impair the senescent retina. A better understanding of how Aβ might target the retinal function may help in designing novel therapies to treat AMD in the future.

Age-related macular degeneration

AMD is the most common cause of irreversible blindness in ageing societies, globally affecting ~50 million individuals with the direct cost estimated at nearly US$ 255 billion.9 The disease affects ~3% of adults,10 and notably increases to a quarter of the population by the eighth decade of life.11 A key process in vision loss is the gradual impairment of the RPE monolayer, which maintains photoreceptors on its apical surface and basally preserves the blood–retinal barrier.1 Early AMD is often asymptomatic, but is typified by the presence of sub-RPE deposits known as drusen consisting of cellular debris and lipids (including extracellular matrix constituents and inflammatory components).12, 13 Formation of hard drusen, which typically occur in the peripheral retina has well-defined borders, and is regarded to be a normal part of the ageing process. In contrast, the formation of macular soft drusen that is characterised by larger size, a diffuse nature with poorly-defined borders that rarely occurs before the age of 55 years is the first clinical indicator of increased risk of disease susceptibility.5 Late AMD is characterised by loss of central vision due to significant RPE/photoreceptor atrophy, referred to as ‘dry AMD’, and/or the breakthrough of invasive blood vessels through the blood–retinal barrier referred to as ‘wet AMD’. Currently, the more prevalent dry form of the disease is untreatable, while several clinical strategies are used to treat the less common but more aggressive wet AMD, with varying degrees of success.4

Although AMD has been characterised clinically, the underlying mechanisms, especially during early disease, remain incompletely understood. The lack of molecular characterisation between dry and wet AMD has therefore limited our understanding and definition of the disease to largely clinical observations and terminology. The recent discovery of Aβ in the ageing retina and its link with AMD presents an exciting opportunity to view AMD from a new perspective, and to better understand disease onset and progression in novel molecular terms.

Aβ—prevalence, structure, and dynamic assembly

The amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene located on chromosome 21q21 encodes a ubiquitously expressed integral type I membrane glycoprotein in several alternatively spliced forms, of which the most predominate isoforms include APP751, APP770, and APP695. APP transcripts and proteins are reported to be abundantly expressed in mouse, rat, as well as human RGC and RPE cells,14, 15 with APP695 being the principal isoform expressed in the brain.16 The function(s) of APP remain incompletely understood, with most studies suggesting signalling via several pathways in the brain.17 The proteolytic processing of APP occurs via two mutually exclusive routes referred to as the amyloidogenic and non-amyloidogenic (or constitutive) pathway.18, 19 Successive cleavage of APP in the amyloidogenic route by enzymes β- and γ-secretase produces the monomeric Aβ peptide with a molecular weight of ~4 kDa.8, 20 However, mutations in genes encoding APP and the enzyme presenilin, a component of the γ-secretase complex, promotes the generation of a longer isoform of Aβ that favours the amyloidogenic pathway, and is associated with several degenerative disease of the brain.7, 21, 22 A large body of work has focused on characterising the C-terminal cleavage of APP by γ-secretase that creates a heterogeneous mixture of Aβ peptides with different solubility, stability, and biological properties.7, 8, 20 Additional heterogeneity of Aβ peptides is generated by post-translational modifications mediated by aminopeptidases, glutaminyl-cyclase/isomerases, and by phosphorylation reactions resulting in a mixture of more than 20 Aβ species,23, 24 of which Aβ37, Aβ38, Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ43 have been reported in conditioned media of cells and in body fluids.8 The predominant forms of Aβ peptide are those with 40 and 42 residues, where Aβ42 generally forms fibrils more rapidly compared with the 40-residue species. This is considered to be due to the additional hydrophobic isoleucine and alanine residues at positions 41 and 42 in the peptide. Experimental substitution of these key amino acids with hydrophilic residues results in a decrease in assembly kinetics.25 Furthermore, hydrophobic regions of Aβ42 spanning residues 17–21 and 31–42 are considered to be important for fibril structure,26 while changes in the hydrophobicity in the sequence, for example, in the variant Phe20Glu alters Aβ42 toxicity, as well as the capacity to aggregate.27 Soluble, monomeric Aβ can be composed of α-helical and/or unordered structure, which then self-associates into low-molecular weight dimers, trimers, and oligomers with a conformational change to β-sheet. Further conformational changes result in the formation of higher ordered structures such as protofibrils and mature amyloid fibrils with a cross-β structural core28 (Figure 1). This sequence of events is described by the ‘nucleation-dependent polymerisation model’, which proposes a 2-step process, where monomeric Aβ undergoes a slow thermodynamically unfavourable reaction to form oligomeric nuclei, followed by a rapid elongation/growth phase with the assembly of larger aggregates and fibril elongation. The formation of nuclei is the critical rate-limiting step, where further fibril formation can be significantly accelerated by the availability of preformed oligomers/nuclei.29 As the nucleus is the highest energy species in this reaction, its concentration should be very low during the aggregation time-course in contrast to monomers and fibrils. However, many studies show oligomer formation in the absence of detectable amyloid fibril formation early in the Aβ amyloidogenesis time course.30, 31 This has resulted in a mechanistic revision of the original model, and polymerisation of Aβ is proposed to occur via metastable intermediaries in a process referred to as ‘nucleated conformational conversion’.32

Figure 1
figure 1

(a–c) Show negative stained transmission electron micrographs depicting the self-assembly of Aβ1–42 at pH 7.4, 50 μM. (a) Shows small spherical oligomers that are visible immediately after preparation of Aβ1-42 peptide (Soura et al50). These assemble further by 24 h to form (b) elongated protofibrils, and finally (c) amyloid fibrils after 48 h incubation. d Shows a structural model of an amyloid fibril composed of cross-β structure and showing a slow twisted architecture. Generation of the model is described in Morris et al.101

Studies utilising oligomeric Aβ, which impairs neurotransmission and causes neuronal death,33 as well as a close link between soluble Aβ oligomer levels and disease progression,34, 35 has resulted in a fundamental shift of interest from fibrillar Aβ to oligomeric Aβ.8 This shift in focus was highlighted in experiments utilising biomimetic unilamellar vesicles, which showed that as Aβ assembles from an oligomeric to fibrillar state, its ability to penetrate membranes also diminishes.36 Even relative to the monomeric form, oligomeric Aβ was found to preferentially interact with cellular membranes to become immobilised on the cell surface.37 The significant differences between oligomeric vs fibrillar Aβ has been proposed to be due to their different capacities to access intracellular compartments.38 This does not, however, automatically imply that fibrillar Aβ plaques are benign, as studies using AD mouse models show neurons in the vicinity of plaques to have reduced synaptic density, loss of synapses, as well as elevated resting Ca2+ levels.39 One hypothesis considers plaques as inert sinks; consisting of aberrantly folded proteins, lipids, and free metals, where a dynamic equilibrium between toxic Aβ oligomers and inert fibrils might exist, resulting in a local spillover of cytotoxic Aβ species in the vicinity.8 Consequently, age-related accumulation of such Aβ deposits may be viewed as potentially pathogenic reservoirs at critical locations in the retina and brain, which may contribute to chronic ‘local’ Aβ-mediated toxicity, as well as associated inflammatory events characteristic of such degenerative tissues.

Mechanisms of Aβ action in degenerative neurons

Aβ pathology in the ageing retina is not well understood. However, insights into Aβ-mediated mechanisms may be gleaned from studying degenerative brains where some mechanistic insights and pathways have been proposed with oligomeric Aβ as a key driver of pathogenicity. Commonly cited arguments against the role of Aβ in AD includes the lack of a correlation between Aβ plaques in AD brains and the extent of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s patients, as well as the observation that alterations to Aβ metabolism and appearance of amyloid plaques often occur many years before clinical symptoms.40 Nonetheless, degenerative neurons show a strong correlation with Aβ, a long-standing observation that is supported by a significant body of literature.7, 8, 20, 23, 41, 42 Aβ involvement in neurodegenerative and neurological spectrum disorders has been shown in Alzheimer’s disease, Fragile X syndrome, Downs syndrome, Autism, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s diseases.7, 43 AD brains, for example, are characterised by a marked neuronal loss and deposition of extracellular fibrils in neuritic plaques consisting of Aβ fibrils.7, 20, 41 The plethora of evidence is highly supportive, but does not prove the hypothesis that ill-defined soluble Aβ species are involved upstream in the pathogenic sequence of events that cause AD.7, 8 Some of these criticisms may be addressed by studying soluble Aβ oligomers, which demonstrate a much closer relationship with disease progression compared with amyloid plaques.34, 35 The relative importance of oligomeric vs fibrillar Aβ in degenerative retinas remains to be established.

Another feature of Aβ pathogenicity in AD is a critical shift in the relative Aβ40:Aβ42 ratios towards elevated Aβ42 that is correlated with increased disease susceptibility.44 However, Aβ-driven pathology is likely to be more complex and include both quantitative as well as qualitative changes to the spectrum of Aβ peptides.8 Age-related changes to Aβ42 as well as post-translational modifications, including pyroglutamate modifications, may well alter seeding of plaques, or drive independent cytotoxicity. Ultimately, the transient and complex nature of Aβ assemblies is an obstacle to elucidating the ‘toxic’ Aβ species and/or conformation(s) that are detrimental to cellular physiology and function. Such issues are likely to arise when investigating Aβ mechanisms in the retina. This limited understanding of how Aβ assemblies cause pathogenicity also extends to mechanism(s) associated with Aβ cytotoxicity. The amphipathic nature of Aβ oligomers has been suggested to contribute to their ability to penetrate/coat/overlie the surface of cellular membranes, or potentially act as cell-penetrating peptides, and has been extensively reviewed elsewhere.42 As with most complex degenerative diseases, the impairment of cellular mechanisms is most likely to occur before appearance of senile plaques and onset of dementia. Indeed, a growing body of evidence supports the idea of early changes driven by toxic Aβ oligomers, including deterioration of long-term potentiation,33 microtubule abnormalities,45 as well as loss of synaptic function.46 The soluble Aβ fraction is primarily composed of Aβ monomers, dimer, trimers, and SDS-stable Aβ oligomers,34, 44 some of which has been reported in hippocampal CA1 region and the cortex of ageing human brains, even in the absence of senile plaques.47 The potency of these small Aβ assembles were highlighted in a study where introduction of soluble Aβ dimers and trimers into rodent brains resulted in cognitive impairment.48 Central to the idea of soluble toxic Aβ peptides as a driver of early pathogenicity is the initial entry of oligomeric Aβ, possibly via disruption of membrane integrity.36, 49 Our work has recently shown that oligomeric Aβ is rapidly internalised by neurons to accumulate in clathrin-positive endosomes,50 supporting evidence that clathrin-mediated endocytosis may be involved in Aβ internalisation,51 as well as findings showing inhibition of endosomal activity partially reduces Aβ-mediated toxicity.52 Other fundamental cellular mechanisms impaired by oligomeric Aβ in susceptible neurons are likely to include the impairment of axonal transport, mitochondrial dysfunction, and synaptic vesicle dynamics. Our ongoing studies to understand these key pathogenic changes will provide valuable insights into early Aβ-mediated activity in degenerative brains, as well as inform on potential pathways of damage in the retina.

Evidence of Aβ in the ageing retina and AMD

Constitutive Aβ generation in the normal retina

Both the retina and the central nervous system (CNS) share a common origin as both are derived from the developing neural tube. Both structures interface intimately with the adjacent vasculature via the blood–retinal and blood–brain barriers. Furthermore, with increasing age, both the retina and the brain develop extracellular deposits associated with degenerative pathology, referred to as drusen and senile plaques, respectively. It is therefore unsurprising that the many striking similarities between drusen and senile plaques include Aβ. Other shared components include the following; serum amyloid P component, apolipoprotein E, immunoglobulin, basement membrane matrices, proteoglycans, and metal ions (Fe3+, Cu2+, and Zn2+), acute-phase reactants, proteases/clearance-related elements, and several complement proteins, as well as other inflammatory mediators that are indicative of local inflammation typically associated with sub-retinal deposits.6 Such remarkable similarities between drusen and senile plaques, coincident with age and poor clinical prognosis, suggest that similar pathological mechanisms may drive degenerative changes in the retina as well as the brain.

Studies have now confirmed that RGC, the inner nuclear layer of the retina,15, 53 as well as the RPE54 expresses APP, and possesses the necessary cellular machinery to generate Aβ. Retinal and RPE cells expresses β-secretase, the four known subunits of γ-secretase, and the three major APP isoforms APP770, APP751, and APP695, as well as neprilysin.14, 54, 55 Furthermore, isolated RPE cells from wild-type C57BL/6 mice were shown to readily synthesise and secrete Aβ, which accumulated in conditioned media,56 while Aβ expression levels increased in rat RGC with age.15 This was not surprising, as abundant Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides have been reported in both aqueous and vitreous humours. Aβ in ocular fluid is thought to originate primarily from the retina and RPE, from where it is secreted to the vitreous humour and subsequently transported to the anterior chamber.55, 57 This follows a similar pattern observed in the CNS, where Aβ is primarily synthesised in neurons but accumulate in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).58 Not only does the retina and RPE constitutively express APP,53, 55 but RPE cells overlying, flanking, or displaced by drusen also show Aβ immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm.54, 57 Current measurements suggest that Aβ levels in the bovine vitreous and retina are considerably lower compared with CSF levels,53, 55 but this may reflect the dynamic behaviour of ‘local Aβ levels/species in the retina’, as well as initial problems associated with Aβ quantification in these tissues. It is noteworthy that the retina is not only continuously exposed to Aβ species, but the very high concentrations of α-secretase cleaved soluble APP found in the vitreous fluids is comparable only to levels in CSF.55 Intriguingly, a recent study demonstrated that α- and β-secretase cleaved APP levels in conditioned media of wild-type neuronal cultures to be directly linked to extracellular Aβ concentrations, with a 1 : 1 relationship between β-cleavage of APP and release of Aβ.59 This highlights some of the difficulties in accurately quantifying Aβ, and given what is known about its pathogenicity in degenerative brains, provides further evidence that the retina is constitutively exposed to Aβ under normal/healthy conditions.

The retinal Aβ burden increases with age

Growth of Aβ deposits with advancing age may be viewed as an alteration in the balance between increased Aβ synthesis vs a reduction in the ability to clear such aggregates. Either or both fates may be sufficient to elevate the Aβ burden in the ageing retina. For example, cultured RPE cells from geriatric C57BL/6 mice displayed elevated Aβ levels in conditioned media compared with RPE cells from younger controls. In contrast, mRNA levels of neprilysin (which clears Aβ) were significantly decreased, while β-secretase activity was elevated in senescent RPE cells, indicating the ability to clear Aβ also diminished with age.56 Analysis of C57BL/6 mice as young as 3 months by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting techniques revealed Aβ accumulations in the RPE-Bruch’s membrane interface, as well as in retinal/choroidal blood vessels. With age, Aβ accumulations in the critical RPE-Bruch’s region increased in subsequent months.60 Of note, this pattern of amyloid deposition was observed in a region where Aβ accumulation is thought to first occur in AMD; in close proximity to the inner collagenous layer of Bruch’s membrane.61 Interestingly, Aβ staining in inner retinal vessels appeared discontinuous, while Aβ positivity in the choroidal vasculature were confined to sub-groups of vessels suggesting a degree of selectivity in Aβ deposition.60 Such points of vulnerability may be related to thinning of blood vessels and reduced flow rates, as observed in the retinal vasculature of early AD patients.62

Aβ deposition with increasing age was not restricted to sub-RPE regions, but was unexpectedly discovered to accumulate in photoreceptor outer segments (POS) in older mice. Such deposits were identified as early as 3 months and by 12 months the outer segments were completely wrapped in Aβ-containing material, which appeared qualitatively different by 24 months.60 Although there is no direct evidence that such material is purely Aβ, the close association between Aβ-immunostaining patterns and scanning EM images argue that Aβ at least constitutes an element of such age-related deposits. Additionally, intravitreal injection of oligomeric Aβ40 into wild-type rats produced the highest immunostaining intensity levels in POS, supporting the idea of preferential Aβ accumulation in the apical proximity of RPE cells.63 Analysis of human post-mortem samples between ages of 31 and 90 years mirrored a similar pattern of increasing Aβ immunostaining in POS.60 This pattern of Aβ accumulation originating at the apical tip of POS and progressing along its length illustrate-specific Aβ aggregation,60 and as such, agree with other findings14, 54, 55, 56 showing retinal/RPE generated Aβ accumulating in posterior eye with advancing age (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Schematic diagram showing multiple locations of Aβ synthesis, secretion, and aggregation in the ageing retina (red asterisk) that is reported in the literature to date. BrM, Bruch’s Membrane; POS, photoreceptor outer segments; RGC, retinal ganglion cells; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium.

Aβ aggregation is involved in key stages of AMD

The evidence discussed thus far confirms that Aβ has a central role in AMD, a large part of which is derived from human post-mortem eyes,57, 61, 64 and provides a clinical snapshot of Aβ involvement in key stages of disease progression. Although such data are often based on high-quality static images, they nonetheless portray a tantalising picture of dynamic Aβ activity in the ageing retina. The presence of Aβ in the retina appears to be correlated with age as well as the extent of sub-retinal drusen loads. For example, EM analysis of 152 human donor eyes ranging from 9 to 91 years of age showed that Aβ assemblies were most prevalent in retinas with moderate-to-high drusen loads.57 Although links between sub-RPE Aβ deposition in the macula vs peripheral retina, or early vs late AMD, or indeed with specific disease phenotypes were not examined, these findings suggest that Aβ might be associated with more advanced stages of AMD. A smaller study consisting of nine AMD retinas and an equivalent number of control retinas found that drusen containing Aβ were present only in patients with AMD. Elevated Aβ reactivity was detected in four of nine AMD retinas, with a few Aβ-positive drusen in two early AMD retinas and numerous Aβ-positive drusen in two retinal samples with geographic atrophy.65 Although this study lacked sufficient sample numbers to arrive at any firm conclusions linking Aβ-positive drusen with AMD, it nonetheless suggests that Aβ pathogenicity is involved in distinct stages of AMD. Confocal immunofluorescence and ultrastructural analysis of post-mortem retinas revealed that Aβ is localised in sub-structural vesicular components within drusen referred to as ‘amyloid vesicles’.54, 57, 61, 64 These structures ranged from 2 to 10 μm in diameter and were readily detected in both macular and peripheral drusen from donors with/without clinical AMD.54 Such amyloid-containing structures within drusen have been reported by several groups using a variety of different Aβ antibodies and appear to vary between 0.25–10 μm,57 10–15 μm,61 and 10–20 μm in diameter.64 In addition, the relative shapes of such amyloid structures within drusen also varied; from spheres to elongated forms,57, 61 and to vesicles that appear to be in the process of budding or fusing.54 Although all studies were in agreement that each drusen may contain multiple amyloid structures, descriptions of amyloid cores and vesicles were largely defined by the choice of Aβ antibodies used in the respective studies.54, 57, 61, 64 Some drusen were described as densely packed with amyloid vesicles accounting for a significant proportion of their total volume, while others contained only a single large vesicle that occupied a substantial portion of the drusen mass.54 For example, Anderson et al57 reported a single drusen to contain >100 spheres of various sizes. The presence of multiple amyloid cores in larger drusen suggested that these drusen may have formed from a coalescence of smaller drusen,61 indicating the evolving complexity of Aβ containing drusen over long periods of time.

Further analysis of amyloid vesicles revealed a highly organised interior consisting of concentric ring-like layers with varying electron densities and bound by an electron dense shell of ~100 nm thick.57 A similar description have also been made with the vesicle interior described as consisting of flocculent material and/or concentric ring-like elements bound by an outer shell or vesicle rim.54 Aβ immunoreactivity was detected throughout all the layers, signifying the apparent central role of Aβ in amyloid vesicles within drusen.57 Despite the limited scope of data offered by human post-mortem eyes along a single plane, as well as a singular point in time, they nonetheless show that Aβ antibodies specific for different conformations localise to different parts of amyloid structures.61, 64 For example, the A11 and M204 antibodies that specifically recognise the toxic oligomeric Aβ forms, but not Aβ monomers or fibrils were typically found to localise centrally within drusen in close proximity to the inner collagenous layer of Bruch’s membrane.61, 64 Hence, the authors believe that such oligomeric cores are different to the substructures described by Anderson et al,57, 61 but conclude that they nonetheless form the majority of Aβ structures observed in drusen.64 Additionally, a wide spectrum of antibodies such as OC, 6E10, WO1, WO2, and 4G8, which specifically bind to Aβ protofibrils and mature fibrils showed a propensity to accumulate towards the outer periphery and shell of amyloid structures within drusen.54, 57, 61, 64 Hence, despite the lack of a comprehensive study that systematically investigates the full spectrum of Aβ conformations in retinal substructures of human mort-mortem retinas, the collective findings thus far agree that drusen contain an abundant variety of Aβ forms and structures (Figure 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Aβ assemblies are prevalent in individuals with moderate-to-high levels of drusen. Aβ is organised into spherical structures termed ‘amyloid vesicles’, which can occupy a large portion of drusen volume, and form potential sites of complement activation. A druse may be densely packed with several amyloid vesicles or contain only a single large vesicle. The presence of distinct Aβ structures may reflect the evolving nature of drusen with disease progression. For example, the presence of multiple oligomer cores in a large drusen may be due to smaller drusen coalescing over time. Aβ in drusen correlates with degenerating photoreceptors and RPE. CC, choriocapillaris; BrM, Bruch’s membrane; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium.

Aβ deposits in the retina triggers a pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic microenvironment

The experimental exposure of cells in the retina, RPE, and choroid to Aβ can induce fundamental changes associated with local retinal inflammation. This evidence is derived from a variety of experimental culture systems, as well as from animal models including Zebra fish, rabbits, rodents, and human post-mortem eyes. A systematic review of these findings reveals a progressive pattern of Aβ-mediated inflammatory and pro-angiogenic effects in the ageing retina, in which we are able to discern between early Aβ-driven changes as well as late-stage AMD pathology associated with Aβ. Such changes are likely to be triggered, and chronically sustained, by a toxic cocktail of Aβ peptides that is readily supplied by multiple Aβ reservoirs surrounding the ageing retina, which includes the immediate environment around the RPE,56 in vitreous fluid,55, 57 the coating of the outer segments of photoreceptors,60 and in sub-retinal drusen.54, 57 Furthermore, these early events are likely to occur well in advance of clinical AMD and include alterations in the expression profiles of key inflammatory genes. For example, human foetal RPE cultures treated with nanomolar concentrations of oligomeric Aβ40 for as little as 24 h resulted in a significant upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-8.66 Another study also demonstrated IL-8 as well as MMP-9 overexpression following oligomeric Aβ40 treatment, coincident with RPE senescence and compromised barrier properties.67 The role of IL-1β in generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as IL-8 in RPE cells has been previously documented, while IL-8 itself is a potent inducer of chemotaxis, correlated with amplification of inflammatory responses and neovascularisation.68, 69 Exposure of the D407 RPE cell line to oligomeric Aβ40 resulted in elevated IL-33, which can accelerate the production of Th2-associated cytokines and promote tissue inflammation.70 Elevation of oxidative stress responses in cultured ARPE-19 cells were also observed within hours of treatment using nanomolar to micromolar levels of the more toxic oligomeric Aβ42.71 These pro-inflammatory activities driven by Aβ are not limited to cultures but are also replicated in animal models. For example, the use of wild-type rats to investigate acute effects of Aβ40 following intravitreal injections revealed elevated levels of pro-inflammatory IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α in the RPE/choroid and neuroretina. In addition, elevation of caspase-1 and NLRP3 indicated activation of the retinal/RPE inflammasome,63 which has been implicated in AMD susceptibility.72 The varying fates of retinal/RPE cells following acute application of Aβ in vivo may reflect a mixture of varied Aβ cytotoxicity as well as Aβ-dosages, length of treatment as well as sites of injection. Hence, intravitreal Aβ40 injections failed to show significant retinal/RPE cell death,63 which is in stark contrast to RPE hypopigmentation, disorganised photoreceptors/RPE, and halving of photoreceptor numbers soon after sub-retinal injections of oligomeric Aβ42 into wild-type mice.71 Similarly, RGC cultures acutely treated with Aβ25–35 or Aβ1–42 induced apoptosis at micromolar concentrations, while treatment with Aβ1–40 proved less toxic.73 The pattern of RGC apoptosis was also observed in a mouse model of glaucoma-associated Aβ co-localisation,74 highlighting the potential involvement of Aβ in multiple degenerative conditions in the eye. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that key changes in gene expression of retinal and RPE cells mediated by Aβ are replicated in vivo to promote a pro-inflammatory milieu in early AMD pathogenesis.

The complement system consist of regulatory molecules in systemic circulation, which constitute the classical, alternative as well as the lectin pathways, and has an important role in AMD susceptibility and risk of disease progression.75 These distinct mechanism of the complement system converge on a common terminal pathway culminating in the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC), opsonization, and lysis of target cells as well as the recruitment and/or activation of inflammatory cells.75, 76 The ability of Aβ peptides to induce chronic inflammation in degenerative brains via direct and independent activation of the complement pathway has been well established.77, 78 Evidence now supports the possibility that Aβ, specifically around drusen, can mediate early inflammatory events in degenerative retinas in a similar manner. An insight into such mechanisms is provided by studies of human post-mortem eyes, showing RPE-synthesised factor H (HF1), a major regulator of the alternative complement pathway, co-localising with its ligand C3b/iC3b in amyloid-containing vesicles within drusen. HF1 and MAC accumulated along the surface of amyloid vesicles in the RPE-choroidal interface and were prevalent in the macular regions from donors with prior histories of AMD.79 This association was also shown in another study of human post-mortem retinas, which revealed iC3b, the activated product of complement C3 in close proximity and co-localised with Aβ deposits in amyloid vesicles.54 Aβ deposits in drusen may form a nucleus around which chronic ‘wound-like’ events may occur (Figure 3), a model which builds on an elegant hypothesis that chronic local inflammatory and immune-mediated events at the level of the RPE-Bruch’s membrane have a critical role in drusen biogenesis, and in the pathobiology of AMD.13, 54, 76, 79

The RPE has a central role in maintaining the blood–retinal barrier, an important function in sustaining the immune-privileged status and homoeostasis of the retinal environment.1, 5 Aβ-mediated pathogenicity in early AMD may also target the structural integrity of RPE barrier properties. For example, acute treatment of ARPE-19 monolayers with 0.1–10 μM oligomeric Aβ42 resulted in the disruption of RPE junctional complexes and actin cytoskeleton, formation of actin stress fibres, impairment of trans-epithelial permeability as well as loss of cell attachment.71 Similar studies in human foetal RPE cultures found that exposure to Aβ42 elevated MMP-9 secretion and shifted cells into a senescent state.67 These findings show a systematic breakdown of ZO-1 and occludin junctional complexes within the RPE that is mediated by MMP-9, and suggest an early mechanism by which chemokine gradients can be established across barriers for subsequent migration of inflammatory cells. Such MMP-driven mechanistic changes have been previously documented in retinas of patients with AMD.80 Aβ-driven structural changes in the RPE monolayer were also observed in vivo, following sub-retinal injections of oligomeric Aβ42, and consisted of disorganised actin filaments and junctional complexes in the absence of apoptosis. Further changes observed include RPE hypopigmentation, damage to photoreceptors including loss of outer segments, and shorter inner segments.71 The complexities of Aβ-mediated activities also include the capacity to generate elevated ROS, a well-documented process in degenerative brains.81 The retina, which is normally subject to constantly high photoxidative stresses,82 may be particularly prone to Aβ-induced ROS-induced damage, in a process compounded by increasing lipofuscin accumulation within RPE cells with age. Furthermore, Aβ has been shown to induce cellular senescence and impair mitochondrial activity in RPE cells.56, 67, 71 The substantial impact of accumulated mitochondrial damage in post-mitotic RPE cells has been well documented in AMD susceptibility.83

Late-stage Aβ-driven mechanisms in AMD may be considered cumulative, and most likely to occur after decades of chronic Aβ exposure in the ageing retina. Although we do not yet fully understand the extent of these mechanisms, a numbers of studies provide a tantalising insight. For instance, exposure of human RPE cultures to 1–25 μM Aβ40 for as little as 24 h resulted in a significant increase of pro-angiogenic VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) expression and a concomitant decrease in anti-angiogenic PEDF (pigment epithelium derived factor).14 The role of VEGF in increasing vascular permeability and triggering endothelial cell proliferation has been well established.1, 5, 14 The RPE monolayer appears to be the only source of VEGF in the retinal environment, and secretes several VEGF isoforms through its basolateral surface towards the choriocapillaris.82 VEGF has a key role in the development of CNV, with anti-VEGF treatment currently forming the mainstay of treatment for wet AMD.1 The ability of Aβ peptides to elevate VEGF levels in the vicinity of the blood–retinal barrier via direct mechanisms14 and possibly via indirect inflammatory triggers54, 63, 70, 76 may help explain the as yet incompletely understood pathology underlying VEGF elevation preceding neovascularisation. Furthermore, conditioned media from RPE cells exposed to Aβ40 triggered tube formation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, suggesting that Aβ also has the capacity to directly influence CNV.14 Such direct pro-angiogenic mechanisms were further confirmed when injection of Aβ42 into Zebra fish eyes resulted in a significant increase of retinal capillary bed densities.84 Collectively, these findings demonstrate that Aβ peptides have a central role in driving early as well as late-stage degenerative mechanisms in the ageing retina.

AMD risk factors promotes Aβ aggregation in the ageing retina

The heterogeneous nature AMD aetiology suggests that the most likely scenario involves a convergence of multiple risk factors to trigger disease pathology in the ageing retina.1, 5, 85 One intriguing idea is that other well-characterised AMD/AD risk factors may have a supportive role in exacerbating Aβ pathology in the eye. These may include a combination of genetic as well as epigenetic risk factors such as diet. Studies to elucidate the molecular basis underlying these changes illustrate striking parallels of Aβ-mediated damage common to both retina and brain. For example, Aβ-mediated disruption of the blood–retinal barrier71, 80 is mirrored in the blood–brain barriers of Tg2576 mice. Specifically, overexpression of Aβ42 in these mice resulted in significant disruption of tight junctions in the cerebral vasculature, long before consolidation of amyloid plaques.86 However, it must be noted that genetic risk factors driving pathology in one compartment may not necessary act in an identical manner in another location. ApoE, which encodes a glycoprotein responsible for cholesterol transport is highly expressed in the retina and is likely to have an important role in maintaining normal retinal function. The frequency of ApoE alleles (ɛ2, ɛ3, and ɛ4) displays a diverging story in AMD and AD. In AD, for example, the ɛ4 allele confers a dose-dependent elevated risk with a decrease in the mean age of AD onset. In contrast, the ɛ2 allele has a beneficial effect on disease-free time, and appears to impart a measure of protection.7, 8 In contrast, our studies using pooled analysis of a large data set of both published and previously unreported studies shown that ɛ4 protects against late AMD. We also reported an increased risk for late AMD in individuals homozygous for ɛ2.87 Such contrasting effects may reflect significant variations in the local structure and physiologies in the senescent brain and retina, respectively. For instance, the positively charged ɛ4 haplotype has been proposed to improve permeability of Bruch’s membrane, which could facilitate lipid transport and reduce sub-retinal debris accumulation associated with drusen formation.12 Reduced transport of lipoprotein across Bruch’s membrane is a consequence of ageing, and has been proposed to promote drusen deposition and impairment of the RPE.88 Furthermore, the ɛ4 isoform has also been implicated in the transport of macular pigments lutein and zeaxanthin, the reduced dietary intake of which is associated with increased risk of AMD.89 An important factor regulating ApoE effects is their interaction with Aβ. In the past, distinct binding properties of different ApoE isoforms to Aβ has been suggested to underlie the discrepancies associated with each genotype,90 while more recently, ApoE isoforms were shown to affect Aβ clearance91 and/or oligomerisation,92 which could lead to diverging outcomes in different tissues.

Cholesterol forms a vital component of the eukaryotic cell regulating membrane fluidity, permeability, and electrical properties. Evidence supports the possibility that the cholesterol content of specific anatomically defined locations in the brain may leave some regions particularly vulnerable in old age. For example, a significant reduction of cholesterol levels in the temporal gyrus of AD brains vs non-demented brains could result in increased Aβ permeation. Furthermore, the decreased cholesterol/phospholipid ratio in AD brains may affect APP cleavage and elevate Aβ generation, as well as facilitate increased Aβ permeability.42 Studies using mouse models have previously shown that a cholesterol enriched diet dramatically exacerbated Aβ pathology, whereas cholesterol-lowering drugs decreased the Aβ burden as well as AD pathology.93 Although the precise nature of interaction(s) between cholesterol and Aβ is not fully understood,93 there is evidence to suggest that cholesterol has the capacity to modulate Aβ generation and its clearance.94 Similar effects were observed when RPE cells obtained from C57BL/6 mouse were treated with cholesterol resulted in a significantly increased Aβ production, while activities of Aβ-degrading enzyme neprilysin and anti-amyloidogenic α-secretase showed a concomitant decrease. Furthermore, senescent C57BL/6 wild-type mice fed with a cholesterol enriched diet developed sub-RPE deposits containing Aβ.95 This pattern of cholesterol-driven Aβ pathology was also observed when New Zealand white rabbits were switched to a cholesterol enriched diet. Aβ deposition was detected in POS, in the outer and inner nuclear layers, as well as in RGC. This was accompanied by increased Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in retinal samples as quantified by ELISA measurements. Further changes include drusen-like debris, increased generation of ROS and apoptotic retinal cells.96 The high dietary intake of cholesterol and saturated fat has been regarded as AMD risk factors for a long time. This is coupled with the observation that cholesterol forms a major component of drusen, the ageing Bruch’s membrane and sub-retinal lesions.88 As most drusen components are thought to be primarily derived from the retinal environment,12, 88 implications for the interplay between Aβ and cholesterol is an intriguing possibility.

Animal models of AMD and anti-Aβ antibody therapy

As an age-related degenerative disease with a complex aetiology, the full spectrum of AMD pathology has been challenging to reproduce in animal models. This, however, has not prevented the development of numerous rodent, rabbit, porcine, and non-human primate animal models. The widely utilised mouse/rat models have the benefit of lower costs, ease of maintenance and the capacity to develop disease symptoms in a relatively short time period, but suffers from defects including the most glaring of which is the lack of a macula. Critically, no single model has been successful in reproducing the full disease spectrum of AMD, although convincing models exist that reproduce limited features of both geographic and exudative forms of the disease. In contrast, the use of non-human primates offers the opportunity to study AMD in a system bearing closer resemblance and physiology to humans, but carries a number of disadvantages including considerable ethical implications, difficulties in genetic manipulation, as well as longer time scales prior to disease onset.

Recent findings that the Aβ burden considerably increases in the senescent retina, and that Aβ may have a central role in drusen formation, has revealed yet another feature that needs to be reproduced in vivo. As with other key milestones of disease progression, the development of an Aβ phenotype along with drusen formation, RPE/photoreceptor abnormalities, CNV, and progressive visual impairment may be critical in ultimately developing a bona fide model of AMD. Unfortunately, only a limited number of rodent models are currently in existence that reproduce retinal Aβ abnormalities. One of the first animal models to place Aβ in the centre stage of retinal pathology was a neprilysin-deficient senescent mouse model that developed Aβ-containing drusen, changes in the outer retina, as well as RPE abnormalities.14 This model also exhibited elevated VEGF expression and diminished PEDF levels suggesting a shift into a pro-angiogenic phenotype, but surprisingly failed to develop CNV even at the advanced age of 27 months. The authors concluded that the lack of progression to late-stage AMD was likely due to the insufficient Bruch’s membrane abnormalities, differences in the role of complement activation or that the animals were insufficiently aged to mimic the senescent human retina. Nonetheless, this mouse model represents a useful tool to study Aβ-driven pathology in early disease.14

The senescent human APOE4 knock-in mouse represents another intriguing model, which upon switching to a high-fat cholesterol-rich (HFC) diet develops drusen, thickened Bruch’s membrane, abnormal RPE adjacent to degenerative photoreceptors, and in extreme cases CNV.97 Of note, Aβ deposits were associated with sub-RPE drusen and with neovascular vessels, with mice developing visual impairment as measured by electroretinogram. Although this model represents an excellent tool to investigate Aβ-mediated pathology in the mouse retina in its own right, the most pertinent finding was that a dose-dependent systemic administration of antibodies targeting the C-terminal of both Aβ40 and Aβ42 in APOE4-HFC mice resulted in a significant protective effect.98 Hence, immunised age-matched animals showed reduced Aβ and activated complement components in sub-RPE deposits, improved structural integrity of the RPE monolayer as well as visual protection. This follows the pattern of reduced amyloid plaques and improved cognitive function in mouse models of AD treated with anti-Aβ antibodies.8, 20 The importance of Aβ in driving retinal degenerative events that manifest as different pathologies was also demonstrated in a mouse models of glaucoma, where Aβ-neutralising antibody treatment produced >80% reduction in RGC apoptosis.74 Collectively, such evidence firmly places Aβ at the centre stage of degenerative events in the ageing retina.

Aβ and AMD—lessons from neurodegeneration and a way forward

Developed societies are confronted with new challenges as the numbers of older individuals gradually begin to outstrip the younger age groups. The impact of age-related illnesses such as dementia, AMD, cardiovascular disease, and osteoporosis are felt at many levels; from individuals to families and societies, and have a major role in setting government health policy. In the UK, AMD affects a significant proportion of the elderly, as well as adults that are registered legally blind. For patients with nvAMD, anti-VEGF treatment offers scope for burdensome disease management through repeated hospital visits consisting of monthly intravitreal injections. However, not all respond to this therapy, while at present, the majority of AMD patients have no effective treatment. The complex disease aetiology of AMD poses major challenges to devising effective solutions. Recent advances in understanding the genetic architecture of AMD has yet to translate to meaningful benefits for patients. An incomplete understanding of the biological processors underpinning disease mechanisms largely accounts for this critical knowledge gap. Degenerative processes in the ageing retina and brain show striking similarities, and offers scope for identifying novel targets as well as pathogenic mechanisms. Aβ, a highly toxic and aggregate-prone peptide capable of eliciting local inflammation and involved in key stages of AMD can be considered such a candidate.

Here, we discussed the hypothesis and exciting new findings that show Aβ has the capacity to play a key role in AMD, the study of which may offer a better understanding of early disease mechanisms, as well as molecular pathways sustaining chronic retinal degeneration. Examples of shared pathology in AD patients include reduced thickness of the nerve fibre layers,99 abnormal retinal blood circulation,62 as well as reduced choroidal thickness,100 locations where degeneration also occurs in glaucoma and AMD.1, 5, 74 Similarities are also found between AD senile plaques and AMD drusen,6 as well as the pattern of selective tissue damage, which argues for shared molecular mechanisms in at least some stages of these diseases. Studies of Aβ and associated pathology in the retina have the potential to offer new insights into AMD, and approach this debilitating blinding disease from a new perspective. Such investigations are already underway in our laboratory.

References

  1. Khandhadia S, Cherry J, Lotery AJ . Age-related macular degeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012; 724: 15–36.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cipriani V, Leung HT, Plagnol V, Bunce C, Khan JC, Shahid H et al. Genome-wide association study of age-related macular degeneration identifies associated variants in the TNXB-FKBPL-NOTCH4 region of chromosome 6p21.3. Hum Mol Genet 2012; 21 (18): 4138–4150.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fritsche LG, Chen W, Schu M, Yaspan BL, Yu Y, Thorleifsson G et al. Seven new loci associated with age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet 2013; 45 (4): 433–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lotery A . Progress in understanding and treating age-related macular degeneration. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22 (6): 739–741.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lotery A, Trump D . Progress in defining the molecular biology of age related macular degeneration. Hum Genet 2007; 122 (3-4): 219–236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohno-Matsui K . Parallel findings in age-related macular degeneration and Alzheimer's disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 2011; 30 (4): 217–238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ . The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 2002; 297 (5580): 353–356.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benilova I, Karran E, De SB . The toxic Abeta oligomer and Alzheimer's disease: an emperor in need of clothes. Nat Neurosci 2012; 15 (3): 349–357.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gordois A, Cutler H, Pezzullo L, Gordon K, Cruess A, Winyard S et al. An estimation of the worldwide economic and health burden of visual impairment. Glob Public Health 2012; 7 (5): 465–481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein R, Cruickshanks KJ, Nash SD, Krantz EM, Nieto FJ, Huang GH et al. The prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128 (6): 750–758.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman DS, O'Colmain BJ, Munoz B, Tomany SC, McCarty C, de Jong PT et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122 (4): 564–572.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crabb JW, Miyagi M, Gu X, Shadrach K, West KA, Sakaguchi H et al. Drusen proteome analysis: an approach to the etiology of age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99 (23): 14682–14687.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson DH, Mullins RF, Hageman GS, Johnson LV . A role for local inflammation in the formation of drusen in the aging eye. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134 (3): 411–431.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshida T, Ohno-Matsui K, Ichinose S, Sato T, Iwata N, Saido TC et al. The potential role of amyloid beta in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. J Clin Invest 2005; 115 (10): 2793–2800.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J, Zhu C, Xu Y, Liu B, Wang M, Wu K . Development and expression of amyloid-beta peptide 42 in retinal ganglion cells in rats. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2011; 294 (8): 1401–1405.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshikai S, Sasaki H, Doh-ura K, Furuya H, Sakaki Y . Genomic organization of the human amyloid beta-protein precursor gene. Gene 1990; 87 (2): 257–263.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shariati SA, De SB . Redundancy and divergence in the amyloid precursor protein family. FEBS Lett 2013; 587 (13): 2036–2045.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shoji M, Golde TE, Ghiso J, Cheung TT, Estus S, Shaffer LM et al. Production of the Alzheimer amyloid beta protein by normal proteolytic processing. Science 1992; 258 (5079): 126–129.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haass C, Schlossmacher MG, Hung AY, Vigo-Pelfrey C, Mellon A, Ostaszewski BL et al. Amyloid beta-peptide is produced by cultured cells during normal metabolism. Nature 1992; 359 (6393): 322–325.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haass C, Selkoe DJ . Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer's amyloid beta-peptide. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8 (2): 101–112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suzuki N, Cheung TT, Cai XD, Odaka A, Otvos L Jr ., Eckman C et al. An increased percentage of long amyloid beta protein secreted by familial amyloid beta protein precursor (beta APP717) mutants. Science 1994; 264 (5163): 1336–1340.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Citron M, Oltersdorf T, Haass C, McConlogue L, Hung AY, Seubert P et al. Mutation of the beta-amyloid precursor protein in familial Alzheimer's disease increases beta-protein production. Nature 1992; 360 (6405): 672–674.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De SB . Proteases and proteolysis in Alzheimer disease: a multifactorial view on the disease process. Physiol Rev 2010; 90 (2): 465–494.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar S, Rezaei-Ghaleh N, Terwel D, Thal DR, Richard M, Hoch M et al. Extracellular phosphorylation of the amyloid beta-peptide promotes formation of toxic aggregates during the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. EMBO J 2011; 30 (11): 2255–2265.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim W, Hecht MH . Sequence determinants of enhanced amyloidogenicity of Alzheimer A{beta}42 peptide relative to A{beta}40. J Biol Chem 2005; 280 (41): 35069–35076.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Luhrs T, Ritter C, Adrian M, Riek-Loher D, Bohrmann B, Dobeli H et al. 3D structure of Alzheimer's amyloid-beta(1-42) fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102 (48): 17342–17347.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Luheshi LM, Tartaglia GG, Brorsson AC, Pawar AP, Watson IE, Chiti F et al. Systematic in vivo analysis of the intrinsic determinants of amyloid Beta pathogenicity. PLoS Biol 2007; 5 (11): e290.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ward RV, Jennings KH, Jepras R, Neville W, Owen DE, Hawkins J et al. Fractionation and characterization of oligomeric, protofibrillar and fibrillar forms of beta-amyloid peptide. Biochem J 2000; 348 (Pt 1): 137–144.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jarrett JT, Berger EP, Lansbury PT Jr. . The carboxy terminus of the beta amyloid protein is critical for the seeding of amyloid formation: implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Biochemistry 1993; 32 (18): 4693–4697.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sabate R, Estelrich J . Evidence of the existence of micelles in the fibrillogenesis of beta-amyloid peptide. J Phys Chem B 2005; 109 (21): 11027–11032.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lomakin A, Teplow DB, Kirschner DA, Benedek GB . Kinetic theory of fibrillogenesis of amyloid beta-protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94 (15): 7942–7947.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee J, Culyba EK, Powers ET, Kelly JW . Amyloid-beta forms fibrils by nucleated conformational conversion of oligomers. Nat Chem Biol 2011; 7 (9): 602–609.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lambert MP, Barlow AK, Chromy BA, Edwards C, Freed R, Liosatos M et al. Diffusible, nonfibrillar ligands derived from Abeta1-42 are potent central nervous system neurotoxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95 (11): 6448–6453.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. McLean CA, Cherny RA, Fraser FW, Fuller SJ, Smith MJ, Beyreuther K et al. Soluble pool of Abeta amyloid as a determinant of severity of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 1999; 46 (6): 860–866.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mc Donald JM, Savva GM, Brayne C, Welzel AT, Forster G, Shankar GM et al. The presence of sodium dodecyl sulphate-stable Abeta dimers is strongly associated with Alzheimer-type dementia. Brain 2010; 133 (Pt 5): 1328–1341.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Williams TL, Day IJ, Serpell LC . The effect of Alzheimer's Abeta aggregation state on the permeation of biomimetic lipid vesicles. Langmuir 2010; 26 (22): 17260–17268.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Narayan P, Ganzinger KA, McColl J, Weimann L, Meehan S, Qamar S et al. Single molecule characterization of the interactions between amyloid-beta peptides and the membranes of hippocampal cells. J Am Chem Soc 2013; 135 (4): 1491–1498.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chafekar SM, Baas F, Scheper W . Oligomer-specific Abeta toxicity in cell models is mediated by selective uptake. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1782 (9): 523–531.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bezprozvanny I . Amyloid goes global. Sci Signal 2009; 2 (63): pe16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Perrin RJ, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM . Multimodal techniques for diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease. Nature 2009; 461 (7266): 916–922.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Selkoe DJ . Amyloid protein and Alzheimer's disease. Sci Am 1991; 265 (5): 68–6 78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Williams TL, Serpell LC . Membrane and surface interactions of Alzheimer's Abeta peptide—insights into the mechanism of cytotoxicity. FEBS J 2011; 278 (20): 3905–3917.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fandrich M . Oligomeric intermediates in amyloid formation: structure determination and mechanisms of toxicity. J Mol Biol 2012; 421 (4-5): 427–440.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang J, Dickson DW, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM . The levels of soluble versus insoluble brain Abeta distinguish Alzheimer's disease from normal and pathologic aging. Exp Neurol 1999; 158 (2): 328–337.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Takahashi RH, Capetillo-Zarate E, Lin MT, Milner TA, Gouras GK . Accumulation of intraneuronal beta-amyloid 42 peptides is associated with early changes in microtubule-associated protein 2 in neurites and synapses. PLoS One 2013; 8 (1): e51965.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Lacor PN, Buniel MC, Furlow PW, Clemente AS, Velasco PT, Wood M et al. Abeta oligomer-induced aberrations in synapse composition, shape, and density provide a molecular basis for loss of connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 2007; 27 (4): 796–807.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Funato H, Enya M, Yoshimura M, Morishima-Kawashima M, Ihara Y . Presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate-stable amyloid beta-protein dimers in the hippocampus CA1 not exhibiting neurofibrillary tangle formation. Am J Pathol 1999; 155 (1): 23–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Cleary JP, Walsh DM, Hofmeister JJ, Shankar GM, Kuskowski MA, Selkoe DJ et al. Natural oligomers of the amyloid-beta protein specifically disrupt cognitive function. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8 (1): 79–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu RQ, Zhou QH, Ji SR, Zhou Q, Feng D, Wu Y et al. Membrane localization of beta-amyloid 1-42 in lysosomes: a possible mechanism for lysosome labilization. J Biol Chem 2010; 285 (26): 19986–19996.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Soura V, Stewart-Parker M, Williams TL, Ratnayaka A, Atherton J, Gorringe K et al. Visualization of co-localization in Abeta42-administered neuroblastoma cells reveals lysosome damage and autophagosome accumulation related to cell death. Biochem J 2012; 441 (2): 579–590.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu F, Yao PJ . Clathrin-mediated endocytosis and Alzheimer's disease: an update. Ageing Res Rev 2009; 8 (3): 147–149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Song MS, Baker GB, Todd KG, Kar S . Inhibition of beta-amyloid1-42 internalization attenuates neuronal death by stabilizing the endosomal-lysosomal system in rat cortical cultured neurons. Neuroscience 2011; 178: 181–188.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dutescu RM, Li QX, Crowston J, Masters CL, Baird PN, Culvenor JG . Amyloid precursor protein processing and retinal pathology in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 247 (9): 1213–1221.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Johnson LV, Leitner WP, Rivest AJ, Staples MK, Radeke MJ, Anderson DH . The Alzheimer's A beta -peptide is deposited at sites of complement activation in pathologic deposits associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99 (18): 11830–11835.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Prakasam A, Muthuswamy A, Ablonczy Z, Greig NH, Fauq A, Rao KJ et al. Differential accumulation of secreted AbetaPP metabolites in ocular fluids. J Alzheimers Dis 2010; 20 (4): 1243–1253.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang J, Ohno-Matsui K, Morita I . Elevated amyloid beta production in senescent retinal pigment epithelium, a possible mechanism of subretinal deposition of amyloid beta in age-related macular degeneration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 423 (1): 73–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Anderson DH, Talaga KC, Rivest AJ, Barron E, Hageman GS, Johnson LV . Characterization of beta amyloid assemblies in drusen: the deposits associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res 2004; 78 (2): 243–256.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Seubert P, Vigo-Pelfrey C, Esch F, Lee M, Dovey H, Davis D et al. Isolation and quantification of soluble Alzheimer's beta-peptide from biological fluids. Nature 1992; 359 (6393): 325–327.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Moghekar A, Rao S, Li M, Ruben D, Mammen A, Tang X et al. Large quantities of Abeta peptide are constitutively released during amyloid precursor protein metabolism in vivo and in vitro. J Biol Chem 2011; 286 (18): 15989–15997.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Hoh KJ, Lenassi E, Jeffery G . Viewing ageing eyes: diverse sites of amyloid Beta accumulation in the ageing mouse retina and the up-regulation of macrophages. PLoS One 2010; 5 (10): e13127.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Luibl V, Isas JM, Kayed R, Glabe CG, Langen R, Chen J . Drusen deposits associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration contain nonfibrillar amyloid oligomers. J Clin Invest 2006; 116 (2): 378–385.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Berisha F, Feke GT, Trempe CL, McMeel JW, Schepens CL . Retinal abnormalities in early Alzheimer's disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48 (5): 2285–2289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu RT, Gao J, Cao S, Sandhu N, Cui JZ, Chou CL et al. Inflammatory mediators induced by amyloid-beta in the retina and RPE in vivo: implications for inflammasome activation in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54 (3): 2225–2237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Isas JM, Luibl V, Johnson LV, Kayed R, Wetzel R, Glabe CG et al. Soluble and mature amyloid fibrils in drusen deposits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51 (3): 1304–1310.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Dentchev T, Milam AH, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Dunaief JL . Amyloid-beta is found in drusen from some age-related macular degeneration retinas, but not in drusen from normal retinas. Mol Vis 2003; 9: 184–190.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kurji KH, Cui JZ, Lin T, Harriman D, Prasad SS, Kojic L et al. Microarray analysis identifies changes in inflammatory gene expression in response to amyloid-beta stimulation of cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51 (2): 1151–1163.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Cao L, Wang H, Wang F, Xu D, Liu F, Liu C . Abeta-induced senescent retinal pigment epithelial cells create a proinflammatory microenvironment in AMD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54 (5): 3738–3750.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Holtkamp GM, Kijlstra A, Peek R, de Vos AF . Retinal pigment epithelium-immune system interactions: cytokine production and cytokine-induced changes. Prog Retin Eye Res 2001; 20 (1): 29–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Yang D, Elner SG, Bian ZM, Till GO, Petty HR, Elner VM . Pro-inflammatory cytokines increase reactive oxygen species through mitochondria and NADPH oxidase in cultured RPE cells. Exp Eye Res 2007; 85 (4): 462–472.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Liu XC, Liu XF, Jian CX, Li CJ, He SZ . IL-33 is induced by amyloid-beta stimulation and regulates inflammatory cytokine production in retinal pigment epithelium cells. Inflammation 2012; 35 (2): 776–784.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Bruban J, Glotin AL, Dinet V, Chalour N, Sennlaub F, Jonet L et al. Amyloid-beta(1-42) alters structure and function of retinal pigmented epithelial cells. Aging Cell 2009; 8 (2): 162–177.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Tarallo V, Hirano Y, Gelfand BD, Dridi S, Kerur N, Kim Y et al. DICER1 loss and Alu RNA induce age-related macular degeneration via the NLRP3 inflammasome and MyD88. Cell 2012; 149 (4): 847–859.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Tsuruma K, Tanaka Y, Shimazawa M, Hara H . Induction of amyloid precursor protein by the neurotoxic peptide, amyloid-beta 25-35, causes retinal ganglion cell death. J Neurochem 2010; 113 (6): 1545–1554.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Guo L, Salt TE, Luong V, Wood N, Cheung W, Maass A et al. Targeting amyloid-beta in glaucoma treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104 (33): 13444–13449.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Khandhadia S, Cipriani V, Yates JR, Lotery AJ . Age-related macular degeneration and the complement system. Immunobiology 2012; 217 (2): 127–146.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Anderson DH, Radeke MJ, Gallo NB, Chapin EA, Johnson PT, Curletti CR et al. The pivotal role of the complement system in aging and age-related macular degeneration: hypothesis re-visited. Prog Retin Eye Res 2010; 29 (2): 95–112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Bradt BM, Kolb WP, Cooper NR . Complement-dependent proinflammatory properties of the Alzheimer's disease beta-peptide. J Exp Med 1998; 188 (3): 431–438.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Akiyama H, Barger S, Barnum S, Bradt B, Bauer J, Cole GM et al. Inflammation and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2000; 21 (3): 383–421.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, Hancox LS, Taiber AJ, Hardisty LI et al. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102 (20): 7227–7232.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Parks WC, Wilson CL, Lopez-Boado YS . Matrix metalloproteinases as modulators of inflammation and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2004; 4 (8): 617–629.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Butterfield DA, Boyd-Kimball D . Amyloid beta-peptide(1-42) contributes to the oxidative stress and neurodegeneration found in Alzheimer disease brain. Brain Pathol 2004; 14 (4): 426–432.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Kinnunen K, Petrovski G, Moe MC, Berta A, Kaarniranta K . Molecular mechanisms of retinal pigment epithelium damage and development of age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol 2012; 90 (4): 299–309.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Blasiak J, Glowacki S, Kauppinen A, Kaarniranta K . Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA damage and repair in age-related macular degeneration. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14 (2): 2996–3010.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Cunvong K, Huffmire D, Ethell DW, Cameron DJ . Amyloid-beta increases capillary bed density in the adult zebrafish retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54 (2): 1516–1521.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Fritsche LG, Fariss RN, Stambolian D, Abecasis GR, Curcio CA, Swaroop A . Age-related macular degeneration: genetics and biology coming together. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2014; 15: 151–171.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Biron KE, Dickstein DL, Gopaul R, Jefferies WA . Amyloid triggers extensive cerebral angiogenesis causing blood brain barrier permeability and hypervascularity in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One 2011; 6 (8): e23789.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. McKay GJ, Patterson CC, Chakravarthy U, Dasari S, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR et al. Evidence of association of APOE with age-related macular degeneration: a pooled analysis of 15 studies. Hum Mutat 2011; 32 (12): 1407–1416.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Curcio CA, Johnson M, Rudolf M, Huang JD . The oil spill in ageing Bruch membrane. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95 (12): 1638–1645.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Loane E, McKay GJ, Nolan JM, Beatty S . Apolipoprotein E genotype is associated with macular pigment optical density. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51 (5): 2636–2643.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Strittmatter WJ, Weisgraber KH, Huang DY, Dong LM, Salvesen GS, Pericak-Vance M et al. Binding of human apolipoprotein E to synthetic amyloid beta peptide: isoform-specific effects and implications for late-onset Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90 (17): 8098–8102.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Castellano JM, Kim J, Stewart FR, Jiang H, DeMattos RB, Patterson BW et al. Human apoE isoforms differentially regulate brain amyloid-beta peptide clearance. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3 (89): 89ra57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Cerf E, Gustot A, Goormaghtigh E, Ruysschaert JM, Raussens V . High ability of apolipoprotein E4 to stabilize amyloid-beta peptide oligomers, the pathological entities responsible for Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J 2011; 25 (5): 1585–1595.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Ricciarelli R, Canepa E, Marengo B, Marinari UM, Poli G, Pronzato MA et al. Cholesterol and Alzheimer's disease: a still poorly understood correlation. IUBMB Life 2012; 64 (12): 931–935.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Castello MA, Soriano S . Rational heterodoxy: cholesterol reformation of the amyloid doctrine. Ageing Res Rev 2013; 12 (1): 282–288.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Wang J, Ohno-Matsui K, Morita I . Cholesterol enhances amyloid beta deposition in mouse retina by modulating the activities of Abeta-regulating enzymes in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 424 (4): 704–709.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Dasari B, Prasanthi JR, Marwarha G, Singh BB, Ghribi O . Cholesterol-enriched diet causes age-related macular degeneration-like pathology in rabbit retina. BMC Ophthalmol 2011; 11: 22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Malek G, Johnson LV, Mace BE, Saloupis P, Schmechel DE, Rickman DW et al. Apolipoprotein E allele-dependent pathogenesis: a model for age-related retinal degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102 (33): 11900–11905.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Ding JD, Johnson LV, Herrmann R, Farsiu S, Smith SG, Groelle M et al. Anti-amyloid therapy protects against retinal pigmented epithelium damage and vision loss in a model of age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108 (28): E279–E287.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Parisi V, Restuccia R, Fattapposta F, Mina C, Bucci MG, Pierelli F . Morphological and functional retinal impairment in Alzheimer's disease patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112 (10): 1860–1867.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Gharbiya M, Trebbastoni A, Parisi F, Manganiello S, Cruciani F, D'Antonio F et al. Choroidal thinning as a new finding in Alzheimer's disease: evidence from enhanced depth imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Alzheimers Dis 2014; 40 (4): 907–917.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Morris KL, Rodger A, Hicks MR, Debulpaep M, Schymkowitz J, Rousseau F et al. Exploring the sequence-structure relationship for amyloid peptides. Biochem J 2013; 450: 275–283.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by generous funding from Fight for Sight (Grant Number 1485/6); National Centre for the Replacement Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research (Grant Number NC/L001152/1); and the Gift of Sight Appeal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J A Ratnayaka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce thematerial. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ratnayaka, J., Serpell, L. & Lotery, A. Dementia of the eye: the role of amyloid beta in retinal degeneration. Eye 29, 1013–1026 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.100

Further reading

Search

Quick links