Correction to: Eye (2011) 25, 1622–1626; doi:10.1038/eye.2011.229; published online 16 September 2011

Since the publication of the above article, the authors have noticed that the sex ratios in Tables 4 and 5 were labeled incorrectly. The correct tables are shown below.

Table 4 Univariate analysis: predictors for good visual outcome
Table 5 Univariate analysis: predictors for poor visual outcome

The authors would like to apologize for this mistake.