Abstract
Purpose To determine what factors influence a decision to move from extracapsular cataract extraction to phacoemulsification as the cataract removal technique of first choice, and to investigate how the transition is managed.
Method Questionnaire surveys were carried out in 1996 and 1997 of consultant ophthalmologists in the former Oxford Region.
Result ‘;Evidence of clinical benefit’ was the strongest factor influencing a decision to change technique, but ‘fear of becoming a dinosaur’ and ‘peer pressure’ were also important factors. Beliefs about advantages of phacoemulsification were little changed with increasing experience, but personal contraindications to phacoemulsification diminished with time. Hard nuclei, mature cataracts and poor zonular support remained relatively strong contraindications to phacoemulsification by the second survey. Only 46% of 14 respondents had performed phacoemulsification under supervision before 'going solo', but 64% felt well or adequately prepared for their first solo phacoemulsification. Influence of non-clinical factors such as equipment availability on the choice of technique did not diminish significantly between surveys. Increasing experience of phacoemulsification appeared to reinforce beliefs about its advantages.
Conclusions Respondents appear to have adopted phacoemulsification with careful preparation, and enthusiasm for the technique has been reinforced by increasing experience. Courses and wet-labs provide limited preparatory experience, but peer supervision is difficult to arrange for consultants. Respondents generally felt that learning phacoemulsification had been stressful, but not as difficult as feared. Implications for the introduction of new surgical techniques into ophthalmological practice in the future are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Ernest PH, Kiessling LA, Lavery KT . Relative strength of cataract incisions in cadaver eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:668–71.
Talamo JH, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD, et al. Natural history of corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:313–8.
Rainer G, Menapace R, Vass C, et al. Surgically induced astigmatism following a 4.0 mm sclerocorneal valve incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:358–64.
Aylward G, Larkin D, Cooling R . Audit of cost and clinical outcome of cataract surgery. Health Trends 1993;25:126–9.
Klein BE, Klein R, Moss SE . Change in visual acuity associated with cataract surgery: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1727–31.
Abrahamsson M, Carlsson B, Tornqvist M, Sterner B, Sjostrand J . Changes of visual function and visual ability in daily life following cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:69–73.
Javitt JC, Street DA, Tielsch JM, et al. National outcomes of cataract extraction. Ophthalmology 1994;101:100–6.
Pfoff DS, Werner JS . Effect of cataract surgery on contrast sensitivity and glare in patients with 20/50 or better Snellen acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:620–5.
Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Lawrence MG, et al. Improved visual function and attenuation of declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:1419–25.
Powe NR, Schein OD, Gieser SC, et al. Synthesis of the literature on visual acuity and complications following cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Cataract Patient Outcome Research Team. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:239–52.
Javitt JC, Brenner H, Curbow B, et al. Outcomes of cataract surgery: improvement in visual acuity in the first, second and both eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:686–91.
Javitt JC, Steinberg EP, Sharkey P, et al. Cataract surgery in one eye or both: a billion dollar per year issue. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1583–92.
Desai P, Reidy A, Minassian DC, et al. Gains from cataract surgery: visual function and quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:868–73.
Laidlaw A, Harrad R . Can second eye cataract surgery be justified? Eye 1993;7:680–6.
Lawrence D, Brogan C, Benjamin L, et al. The effectiveness of surgery: a study of a new patient-assessed cataract outcomes instrument. Buckinghamshire Health Board, 1995.
Schein OD, Steinberg EP, Javitt JC, et al. Variation in cataract surgery practice and clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1142–52.
Powe NR, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. Rigor of research methods in studies of the effectiveness and safety of cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:228–38.
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Management of cataract. Effective Health Care 1996;[Feb] 2(3). Churchill Livingstone.
Courtney P . The national cataract surgery survey. I. Method and descriptive features. Eye 1991;6:487–92.
Desai P . The national cataract surgery survey. II. Clinical outcomes. Eye 1993;7:489–94.
Desai P . The national cataract surgery survey. III. Process features. Eye 1993;7:667–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonglore, B., Smith, R. Extracapsular cataract extraction to phacoemulsification: Why and how?. Eye 12, 976–982 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.253
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.253
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Comparison between refractive outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and standard phacoemulsification
BMC Ophthalmology (2020)
-
The results of cataract nigra cases operated with the mini-nuc technique
International Ophthalmology (2009)