Abstract
Purpose There are differences in the properties of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to various forms of pattern stimulation and it is not clear how these differences reflect macular and parmacular function in amblyopic and normal eyes. We assessed pattern-onset, -reversal and -offset VEPs from amblyopic eyes and compared them with the responses from the fellow eyes, and from controls, to gauge the relative effectiveness of these stimulus modes.
Methods The three modes of pattern stimulation were presented sequentially in a single recording run to enable direct comparisons to be made for identical recording conditions. Half-field stimulation was used, as this elicits components over the ipsilateral and contralateral occipital scalp relative to the stimulated half-field, which reflect stimulation of macular and paramacular areas of the visual field. Eighteen amblyopes treated by occlusion and 20 control children were studied.
Results Multivariate analysis of variance showed significant differences between ambylopic and fellow eyes in amblyopes: pattern-onset components were significantly attenuated and ipsilateral reversal components were significantly prolonged in amblyopic eyes. When fellow eyes of amblyopes were compared with the eyes of controls, the reversal P100 and offset P110 and N165 components showed significant differences.
Conclusions Ipsilateral reversal components and onset CH and contralateral P105 were the most affected in amblyopic eyes. The subnormal findings for the fellow eyes of amblyopes suggest that occlusion may have a long-standing physiological effect on the patched eye, not normally clinically apparent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Spekreijse H, Khoe LH, van der Tweel LH . A case of amblyopia: electrophysiology and psychophysics of luminance and contrast. In: Arden GB, editor. The visual system. New York: Plenum Press, 1972:141–56.
Sokol S, Bloom B . Visually evoked cortical responses of amblyopes to a spatially alternating stimulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1973;12:936–9.
Arden GB, Barnard WM . Effect of occlusion on the visual evoked response in amblyopia. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1979;99:419–26.
Sokol S . Abnormal evoked potential latencies in amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1983;67:310–4.
Blumhardt LD, Halliday AM . Hemisphere contributions to the composition of the pattern-evoked waveform. Exp Brain Res 1979;36:53–69.
Shawkat FS, Kriss A . Sequential pattern-onset, -reversal and -offset VEPs: comparison of effects of checksize. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998;18:495–503.
Shawkat FS, Kriss A . Effects of experimental scotomata on sequential pattern-onset, -reversal, and -offset VEPs. Doc Ophthalmol 1998;94 (in press).
Shawkat FS, Kriss A . Interocular interaction assessed by VEPs to pattern-onset, -reversal and -offset in normally sighted and amblyopic subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;104:74–81.
Kriss A, Spekreijse H, Verduyn Lunel HFE, Braamhaar I, de Waal BJ, Barrett G . A comparison of pattern onset, offset and reversal responses: effects of age, gender and check size. In: Nodar R, Barber C, editors. Evoked potentials II. New York: Butterworth, 1984:553–61.
Barrett G, Blumhardt LD, Halliday AM, Halliday E, Kriss A . A paradox in the lateralization of the visual evoked response. Nature 1976;261:253–5.
Jeffreys DA . Cortical source locations of pattern-related VEPs (visual evoked potentials) recorded from the human scalp. Nature 1971;229:502–4.
Halliday AM, Barrett G, Blumhardt LD, Kriss A . The macular and paramacular subcomponents of the pattern evoked response. In: Lehmann D, Callaway E, editors. Human visual evoked potentials: applications and problems. New York: Plenum Press, 1979:135–51.
Kriss A, Halliday AM . A comparison of occipital potentials evoked by pattern onset, offset and reversal by movement. In: Barber C, editor. Evoked potentials. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1980:205–12.
Leguire LE, Rogers GL, Bremer DL . Amblyopia: the normal eye is not normal. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1990;27:32–8.
Zhao KX . An investigation of the multi-channel VEP topography by full field stimulation in functional amblyopia of children. Chung Hua Yen Ko Tsa Chih 1990;26:68–72.
Fil'chikova LI, Kriukovskikh ON, Dubovskaia LA, Matveev SG . The effect of occlusion of the better seeing eye on the function of the visual system in children with unilateral amblyopia. Vestn Oftalmol 1993;109:8–11.
Kriss A, Thompson DA, Lloyd IC, Jeffrey B, Russell-Eggitt I, Taylor D . Pattern VEP findings in young children treated for unilateral congenital cataract. In: Cottlier E, editor. Congenital cataract. Austin: RJ Landes, 1994:79–88.
Thompson DA, Mller H, Russell-Eggitt I, Kriss A . Visual acuity in unilateral cataract. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:794–8.
Blumhardt LD, Barrett G, Halliday AM, Kriss A . The effect of experimental ‘scotomata’ on the ipsilateral and contralateral responses to pattern reversal in one half-field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;45:376–92.
Haimovic IC, Pedley TA . Hemi-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. I. Normal subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;54:111–20.
Yiannikas C, Walsh JC . The variation of the pattern shift visual evoked response with size of the stimulus field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983;55:427–35.
Arden GB, Barnard WM, Mushin AS . Visually evoked responses in amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1974;58:183–92.
Regan D . Speedy assessment of visual acuity in amblyopia by the evoked potential method. Ophthalmologica 1977;175:159–64.
Sokol S . Visual evoked potentials to checkerboard pattern stimuli in strabismic amblyopia. In: Desmedt JE, editor. Visual evoked potentials in man: new developments. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977:410–7.
Jeffreys DA . Cortical source locations of pattern-related VEPs (visual evoked potentials) recorded from the human scalp. Nature 1971;229:502–4.
Jeffreys DA, Axford JG . Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin. Exp Brain Res 1972;6:1–21.
Jeffreys DA, Axford JG . Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin. Exp Brain Res 1972;6:22–40.
Estéves O, Spekreijse H . Relationship between pattern appearance-disappearance and pattern reversal responses. Exp Brain Res 1974;19:233–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shawkat, F., Kriss, A., Timms, C. et al. Comparison of pattern-onset, -reversal and -offset VEPs in treated amblyopia. Eye 12, 863–869 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.219
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.219
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Pattern-onset and OFFset visual evoked potentials in the diagnosis of hemianopic field defects
Documenta Ophthalmologica (2021)