Abstract
Purpose An electronic meter that measures electrostatic charge was designed and built. The hypothesis tested was that an intraocular lens (IOL) attains a charge during handling in the operating theatre and that washing the IOL with balanced salt solution (BSS) would result in a reduction in the surface charge. Once exposed to the air a charged IOL may attract particulate matter to its surface before implantation into the eye.
Methods This experiment was performed in the operating theatre under sterile conditions mimicking cataract surgery. The lens box was opened onto a trolley and the lens container opened by a scrubbed assistant. The operator (also scrubbed) removed the lens with MacPherson's forceps. The charge on the lens was then measured without delay, or after the lens had been washed with 1-2 ml of BSS.
Results The mean charge on unwashed lenses was 1.43 × 10-10 C (n = 12) and on washed lenses was 0.59 × 10-10 C (n = 10). The difference in the charges was significant (p = 0.03, unpaired t-test).
Conclusion Washing of an IOL prior to implantation will reduce the surface charge and is therefore also likely to reduce the chance of contamination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Howorth FH . Prevention of airborne infection during surgery. Lancet 1985;I:386–8.
Tennant JL, Smirmaul H, Meltzer DW . Use of the piezoelectric gun to remove surface charge from intraocular lenses. J Am Int Ocul Implant Soc 1984;10:486–7.
Horowitz P, Hill W . The art of electronics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989:20–22.
Kattan HM, Flynn HW Jr, Pflugfelder SC, Robertson C, Forster RK . Nosocomial endophthalmitis survey: current incidence of infection after intraocular surgery. Ophthalmology 1991;98:227–38.
Weinberg RS (Chair). Basic and clinical science course section 9. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 1994–5:100–8.
Samad A, Solomon LD, Miller RA, Mendelson J . Anterior chamber contamination after uncomplicated phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:143–50.
Egger SF, Huber-Spitzy V, Schold C, Schneider B . Grabne Bacterial contamination during extracapsular cataract extraction: prospective study on 200 consecutive cases. Ophthalmologica 1994;208:77–81.
Manners TD, Chitkara DK, Marsh PJ, Stoddart MG . Anter chamber aspirate cultures after small incision cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:878–80.
Sherwood DR, Rich WJ, Jacob JS, Hart RJ, Fairchild YL . Bacterial contamination of intraocular and extraocular fluid during extracapsular cataract extraction. Eye 1989;3:308–12.
Dickey JB, Thompson KD, Jay WM . Anterior chamber aspirate cultures after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Am Ophthalmol 1991;112:278–82.
Drolsum L, Davanger M, Haaskjold E . Risk factors for an inflammatory response after extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber IOL. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1994;72:21–6.
Nishi O . Fibrinous membrane formation on the posterior chamber lens during the early postoperative period. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988;14:73–7.
Shah SM, Spalton DJ, Muir MK . Specular microscopy of the anterior intraocular lens surface. Eye 1993;7:707–10.
Shah SM, Spalton DJ . Natural history of cellular deposits on the anterior intraocular lens surface. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21:466–71.
Shah SM, Spalton DJ . Comparison of the postoperative inflammatory response in the normal eye with heparin-surface-modified and poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21:579–85.
Portoles M, Refojo MF, Leong FL . Reduced bacterial adhesion to heparin-surface-modified intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993;19:755–9.
Vafidis GC, Marsh RJ, Stacey AR . Bacterial contamination of intraocular lens surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1984;68:520–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davies, N., Rassam, S. & Shah, S. Measurement of electrostatic charge on intraocular lenses. Eye 12, 449–452 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.103
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.103