Abstract
The results of flash visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in 44 infants blind or severely visually impaired from non-ocular causes are presented, and related to the subsequent visual outcome. Ocular causes of visual impairment were excluded by clinical examination and electroretinography. Using a 2 × 2 contingency table, a significant association between YEP and outcome was demonstrated (X2 = 3.51, 1 d.f., p = 0.05). Of 13 infants with normal VEPs, 11 demonstrated substantial visual improvement (negative predictive value = 84.6%). However, of the 31 with abnormal VEPs, only 14 remained severely impaired/blind; the other 17 demonstrating visual improvement (positive predictive value = 45.1%). The sensitivity of the method was high in that 14 of 16 (87.5%) infants who remained impairedlblind had abnormal VEPs, but specificity was low as only 11 of 28 (39.3%) who showed visual improvement had normal VEPs. The accuracy of the technique was therefore low, 25 of 44 (56.8%) being true positive/ negative. With regard to visual outcome when faced with an apparently blind infant, it is important not to be too pessimistic for, as is shown in this study, 28 of 44 demonstrated substantial improvement. There are no absolute indicators of prognosis, but the presence of structural cerebral lesions and a history of either neonatal meningitis or encephalopathy are relatively bad prognostic signs. The flash YEP, despite its limitations, is a useful prognostic tool, particularly in those apparently blind infants whose normal ocular examination/electroretinogram is accompanied by normal VEPs. Those with abnormal VEPs, however, do not necessarily have a poor prognosis, but should be followed-up as maturational changes and/or improvements in function of the sensory pathway will be reflected in the evoked potentials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Lambert SR, Taylor D, Kriss A . The infant with nystagmus, normal appearing fundi, but an abnormal ERG. Surv Ophthalmol 1989;34:173–86.
Mackie R, McCulloch D . Assessment of visual acuity in multiply handicapped children. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:290–6.
Mushin J . Visual evoked potentials. In: Levene MI, Bennet MJ, Punt J, editor. Neonatal neurology and neurosurgery. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1988:206–12.
Taylor M, McCulloch D . Prognostic value of VEPs in young children with acute onset of cortical blindness. Pediatr Neurol 1991;7:111–5.
Wong V . Cortical blindness in children: a study of etiology and prognosis. Pediatr Neurol 1991;7:178–85.
Lambert S, Kriss A, Taylor D . Detection of isolated occipital lobe anomalies during early childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol 1990;32:451–5.
Muttitt S, Taylor M, Kobayashi J, Macmillan L, Whyte H . Serial visual evoked potential and outcome in term birth asphyxia. Pediatr Neurol 1991;7:86–90.
Taylor M, Murphy W, Whyte H . Prognostic reliability of somatosensory and visual evoked potentials of asphyxiated term infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 1992;34:507–15.
McCulloch D, Taylor M, Whyte H . Visual evoked potentials and visual prognosis following perinatal asphyxia. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:229–33.
Lambert S, Kriss A . Electroretinography and visual evoked cortical potential in developmental delay. In: Heckinlively J, Arden G, editors. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. St Louis: Mosby/Year Book, 1991:581–4.
Fielder A, Russell-Eggitt I, Dodd K, Mellor D . Delayed visual maturation. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1985;104:653–61.
Hoyt C . The clinical usefulness of the visual evoked response. Paediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1984;21:231–4.
Frank Y, Torres F . Visual evoked potentials in the evaluation of ‘cortical blindness’ in children. Ann Neurol 1979;6:126–9.
Aldrich M, Alessi A, Beck R, Gilman S . Cortical blindness: etiology, diagnosis, and prognosis. Ann Neurol 1987;21:149–58.
Bodis-Wollner I, Atkin A, Raab E . Visual association cortex and vision in man: pattern-evoked occipital potentials in a blind boy. Science 1977;198:629–31.
Whiting S, Jan J, Wong P, Farrell OF, McCormick A . Permanent cortical visual impairment in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1985;27:730–9.
Dubowitz L, Mushin J, Vries LD, Arden G . Visual function in the newborn infant: is it cortically mediated? Lancet 1986;I:1139–41.
Harding G . Flash visual evoked cortical potential in development delay. In: Heckinlively J, Arden G, editors. Principles and practice of clinical electro-physiology of vision. St Louis: Mosby/Year Book, 1991:585–8.
Jasper H . Report to the Committee on Methods of Clinical Examination in Electroencephalography. Elec-troencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:370–5.
Ciganek L . The EEG response (evoked potential) to light stimulus in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1961;13:163–72.
Denny-Brown D, Chambers RA . Physiological aspects of visual perception. Arch Neurol 1976;33:219–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clarke, M., Mitchell, K. & Gibson, M. The prognostic value of flash visual evoked potentials in the assessment of non-ocular visual impairment in infancy. Eye 11, 398–402 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.84
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.84
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Flash VEP in clinically stable pre-term and full-term infants
Documenta Ophthalmologica (2020)
-
Paradoxical robust visual evoked potentials in young patients with cortical blindness
Documenta Ophthalmologica (2009)
-
Flash Visually Evoked Potentials in the Newborn and their Maturation During the First Six Months of Life
Documenta Ophthalmologica (2005)