Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess patients' perceptions and priorities when consulting doctors in eye casualty, to assess their satisfaction with eye casualty and to evaluate and improve patients' level of knowledge and understanding of their treatment.
Methods: A selected consecutive group of 130 patients presenting to eye casualty between 1 July and 15 September 1995 was interviewed by two of the authors prior to collecting their medication. A further group was interviewed again after collecting their medication from the hospital pharmacist. The hospital pharmacist reiterated treatment details when patients collected their medication. Interviews were conducted by means of a questionnaire. There was no inter- or intra-observer variation. Patients' priorities and perceptions were measured as percentages of the group. Patient satisfaction was measured both by a score on a standardised questionnaire and on a visual analogue scale. Patient recall of treatment details was scored as correct or incorrect. The score prior to and after seeing the pharmacist was compared in those patients who were interviewed after collecting their medication.
Results: Among the patients 30.8% considered themselves emergencies, 20.8% were referred and the remainder attended for non-urgent reasons. Eighty-three per cent (83.0%) were wholly satisfied with the consultation. The consultation scored an average of 8.3, SD 1.6, measured on a visual analogue scale of 0-10. When asked the most important aspects of the consultation 54.6% cited treatment, 25.4% reassurance and 20.0% diagnosis. Ninety-six per cent felt that their treatment had been adequately explained; however, 78.3% made errors when reporting their regimen. A significant improvement in patients' level of recall was found after they had received further information from the hospital pharmacist.
Conclusions: Firstly, this study shows patients' perceptions and priorities when visiting eye casualty. Secondly, it demonstrates that patients are generally satisfied with their eye casualty attendance. Thirdly, many patients depart with poor understanding of their eye treatment regime which is likely to affect compliance. Communication between doctors and patients was enhanced by involvement of the hospital pharmacist. This strategy is applicable not only to an ophthalmic casualty unit but also to a wider range of settings and could provide a service standard for future audit.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Jones NP, Hayward JM, Khaw PT, Elkington AR . Function of an ophthalmic A&E department: results of six month survey. BMJ 1986;292:188–90.
Chiapella AP, Rosenthal AR . One year in an eye casualty clinic. Br J Ophthalmol 1985;69:865–70.
Edwards RS . Ophthalmic emergencies in a district general hospital casualty department. Br J Ophthalmol 1987;71:938–42.
Verma L, Arora R, Tewari HK, Khosla PK . Eye casualty department. J R Soc Med 1994;87:217–8.
George S, Read S, Westlake L, Williams B, Fraser-Moodie A, Pritty P . Evaluation of nurse triage in a British A&E department. BMJ 1992;304:876–8.
Sheldrick JH, Vernon SA, Wilson A, Read SJ . Demand incidence of ophthalmic disease in a defined urban population. BMJ 1992;305:904–5.
Armstrong D . What do patients want? BMJ 1991;303:261–2.
Martin E, Russell D, Goodwin S, Chapman R, North M, Sheridan P . Why patients consult and what happens when they do. BMJ 1989;303:261–2.
Jones CS, McGowan A . Self referral to an A&E department for another opinion. BMJ 1989;298:1182–3.
Rashid A, Forman W, Jagger C, Mann R . Consultations in general practice: a comparison of patients' and doctors' satisfaction. BMJ 1989;299:1015–6.
Virji A . A study of patients attending without appointments in an urban general practice. BMJ 1990;301:22–6.
Morrell DC, Evans ME, Morris RW, Roland MO . The five minute consultation: effect of time on clinical content and patient satisfaction. BMJ 1986;292:870–3.
Singh S . Self referral to A&E: patients' perspectives. BMJ 1988;297:1179–80.
Appelbaum PS, Grisso T . Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1635–8.
Williams GH, Wood PH . Common sense beliefs about illness: a mediating role for the doctor. Lancet 1986;II:1435–7.
Buckalew LW, Sallis RE . Patient compliance and medication prescription. J Clin Psychol 1986;42:49–53.
Cockburn J, Gibberd R, Reid A, Sanson-Fisher R . Determinants of non-compliance with short term antibiotic regimens. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 1987;295:814–8.
Herrier RN, Boyce RW . Does counselling improve compliance? Am Pharmacy 1995;35:11–2.
Williford SL, Johnson DF . Impact of pharmacist counselling on medication knowledge and compliance. Military Med 1995;160:561–4.
Brackenbury HB . Patient and doctor. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1935.
Cassidy M . Doctor and patient. Lancet 1938;I:175–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edmunds, B., Francis, P. & Elkington, A. Communication and compliance in eye casualty. Eye 11, 345–348 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.73
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.73