Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

General practitioner registrars' opinions of general practice training in ophthalmology: A questionnaire survey in the Northern Region

Abstract

Purpose: Approximately 6% of general practitioners have worked in ophthalmology but to our knowledge the relevance of this training has not previously been evaluated.

Methods: We sent an anonymous questionnaire to all doctors who had held general practitioner registrar (vocational training) posts in ophthalmology in the Northern Region during a 5-year period (1989–1994).

Results: Twenty-six of 48 (54%) questionnaires were returned. Twenty-five of 26 respondents (96%) thought the training was useful, with 22 (91.7%) continuing to use some ophthalmic practical skills and 17 (65.4%) said they had received adequate and relevant clinical exposure. Twenty-one (87.5%) of those in general practice felt that they were more confident with eye problems than their peers and 12 (50%) said their referral patterns differed. Eleven (46%) had provided advice for colleagues. However, 9 (34.6%) commented on the large service commitment and 5 (19%) felt that supervision had been inadequate. Only 9 (34.6%) had received relevant teaching and 18 (69%) thought more was necessary.

Conclusion: We conclude that general practitioner registrar posts in ophthalmology are useful and rewarding but that there is scope for improvement.

References

  1. McDonnell PJ . How do general practitioners manage eye disease in the community? Br J Ophthalmol 1988; 72: 733–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson A . The red eye: a general practice survey. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987; 37: 62–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts DStC . Steroids, the eye, and general practitioners. BMJ 1986; 292: 1414–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Featherstone PI, James C, Hall MS, Williams A . General practitioners' confidence in diagnosing and managing eye conditions: a survey in south Devon. Br J Gen Practice 1992; 42: 21–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones NP, Lloyd IC, Kwartz DO . General practitioner referrals to an eye hospital: a standard referral form. J R Soc Med 1990; 83: 770–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheldrick JH, Vernon SA, Wilson A, Read SJ . Demand incidence and episode rates of ophthalmic disease in a defined urban population. BMJ 1992; 305: 933–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly DR, Murray TS . Twenty years of vocational training in the west of Scotland. BMJ 1991; 302: 28–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reeve H, Bowman A . Hospital training for general practice: views of trainees in the North Western region. BMJ 1989; 298: 1432–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reynolds GA, Chitnis JG, Roland MO . General practitioner outpatient referrals: do good doctors refer more patients to hospital? BMJ 1991; 302: 1250–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dayan, M., Fitt, A. & Bosanquet, R. General practitioner registrars' opinions of general practice training in ophthalmology: A questionnaire survey in the Northern Region. Eye 11, 496–499 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.133

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.133

Keywords

  • Ophthalmology
  • General practitioner
  • General practitioner registrar
  • Training

Search

Quick links