Abstract
The best method of screening for diabetic retinopathy is still debated: fundus photography, general practitioners, hospital physicians and ophthalmic opticians have been advocated. This study compared the performance of an ophthalmic optician with an ophthalmologist, both using mydriatic and slit lamp biomicroscopy and direct ophthalmoscopy. A total of 474 eyes of diabetics in a single group practice were examined by both practitioners at their annual check. There was total agreement about presence or absence of retinopathy in 366 eyes (77%). Although the optician diagnosed less background diabetic retinopathy (83 versus 123 eyes) and diabetic maculopathy (47 eyes versus 63 eyes), he would have referred 20 of 26 eyes with moderate or severe maculopathy and 33 of 36 eyes with moderate or severe background retinopathy: sensitivities of 0.77 and 0.92 respectively. This compares favourably with previous studies and we suggest that ophthalmic opticians with suitable training would be an effective body to screen for diabetic retinopathy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
WHO/IDF Europe. Diabetes and research in Europe: the St Vincent declaration. Diabetes Med 1990; 7: 360.
Anonymous. Public health focus: prevention of blindness associated with diabetic retinopathy. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkl Rep 1993; 42: 191–5.
Javitt JC, Aiello LP, Chiang Y, Ferris FL, Canner JK, Greenfield S . Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government: implications for health-care reform. Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 909–17.
Leese GP, Ahmed S, Newton RW, Jung RT, Ellingford A, Baines P, Roxburgh S, Coleiro J . Use of mobile screening unit for diabetic retinopathy in rural and urban areas. BMJ 1993; 306: 187–9.
Foulds WS, MacCuish AC, Barrie T, et al Diabetic retinopathy in the West of Scotland: its detection and prevalence, and the cost-effectiveness of a proposed screening programme. Health Bull (Edinb) 1983; 41: 318–26.
Peters AL, Davidson MB, Ziel FH . Cost-effective screening for diabetic retinopathy using a nonmydriatic retinal camera in a prepaid health-care setting. Diabetes Care 1993; 16: 1193–5.
Taylor R, Lovelock L, Tunbridge WM, Alberti KG, Brackenridge RG, Stephenson P, Young E . Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study. BMJ 1990; 301: 1243–7.
Heaven CJ, Cansfield J, Shaw KM . The quality of photographs produced by the non-mydriatic fundus camera in a screening programme for diabetic retinopathy: a 1 year prospective study. Eye 1993; 7: 787–90.
Wareham N, Greenwood R . Screening for diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic fundus photography. Diabetic Med 1991; 8: 607–8.
Jones D, Dolben J, Owens DR, Vora JP, Young S, Creagh FM . Non-mydriatic Polaroid photography in screening for diabetic retinopathy: evaluation in a clinical setting. BMJ 1988; 296: 1029–30.
Pugh JA, Jacobson JM, van Heuven WA, Watters JA, Tuley MR, Lairson DR, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the wide-angle retinal camera. Diabetes Care 1993; 16: 889–95.
Moss EM, Klein R, Kessler SD, Richie KA . Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 62–7.
Buxton MJ, Sculpher MJ, Ferguson BA, Humphreys JE, Altman JFB, Spiegelhalter DJ, et al Screening for treatable diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of different methods. Diabetic Med 1991; 8: 371–7.
Forrest RD, Jackson CA, Yudkin JS . Screening for diabetic retinopathy: comparison of a nurse and a doctor with retinal photography. Diabetes Res 1987; 5: 39–42.
Sullivan FM, Stearn R, MacCuish AC . The role of general practitioners in diabetic eye care in Lanarkshire. Diabetic Med 1994; 11: 583–5.
Reenders K, de Nobel E, van den Hoogen H, van Weel C . Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners. Scand J Primary Health Care 1992; 10: 306–9.
Griffith, SP, Freeman WL, Shaw CJ, et al Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting: a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography. J Fam Practice 1993; 37: 49–56.
Sussman EJ, Tsiaras WG, Soper KA . Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA 1992; 247: 3231–4
Hill RD . Screening for diabetic retinopathy at primary health care level. Diabetologica 1981; 20: 670.
Burns-Cox CJ, Dean Hart JC . Screening of diabetics for retinopathy by ophthalmic opticians. BMJ 1985; 290: 1052–4.
Kleinstein RN, Roseman JM, Herman WH, Holcombe J, Louv WC . Detection of diabetic retinopathy by optometrists. J Am Optom Assoc 1987; 58: 879–82.
Tregear SJ, Ripley LG, Knowles PJ, Gilday RT, de Alwis DV, Reffin JP . Automated tritan discrimination sensitivity: a new clinical technique for the effective screening of severe diabetic retinopathy. Int J Psychophysiol 1994; 16: 191–8.
Wilson JMG, Jungner G . The principles and practice of screening for disease. Public health papers 34. Geneva: WHO, 1968.
Singer DE, Nathan DM, Fogel HA, Schachat AP . Screening for diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 1991; 116: 660–71.
MacCuish AC . Early detection and screening for diabetic retinopathy. Eye 1993; 7: 254–9.
Begg IS . Screening for diabetic retinopathy: changes in direction? Can J Ophthalmol 1993; 28: 3–4.
Torgerson DJ, Donaldson C . An economic view of high compliance as a screening objective. BMJ 1994; 308: 117–9.
Williams EMI, Vessey MP . Randomised trial of two strategies offering women mobile screening for breast cancer. BMJ 1989; 299: 158–9.
Clark JB, Grey RH, Lim KK, Burns-Cox CJ . Loss of vision before ophthalmic referral in blind and partially sighted diabetics in Bristol. Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 741–4.
Barrie T, Bronte-Stewart J, MacCuish A, Kirkness C . The role of optometrists in the screening for diabetic eye disease in the community. Poster at Royal College of Ophthalmologists meeting, Birmingham, 1995.
Sculpher MJ, Buxton MJ, Ferguson BA, et al A relative cost-effectiveness analysis of different methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Med 1991; 8: 644–50.
Retinopathy Working Party. A protocol for screening diabetic retinopathy in Europe. Diabetic Med 1991; 8: 263–7.
American Academy of Ophthalmology. Quality of Care Committee, Retina Panel. Diabetic retinopathy: preferred practice pattern. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hammond, C., Shackleton, J., Flanagan, D. et al. Comparison between an ophthalmic optician and an ophthalmologist in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Eye 10, 107–112 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1996.18
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1996.18
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Agreement in clinical decision-making between independent prescribing optometrists and consultant ophthalmologists in an emergency eye department
Eye (2020)
-
The Role of Retinal Imaging and Portable Screening Devices in Tele-ophthalmology Applications for Diabetic Retinopathy Management
Current Diabetes Reports (2016)
-
Ophthalmic nurse practitioner led diabetic retinopathy screening. Results of a 3-month trial
Eye (2006)
-
Does macular laser alter the refraction in a diabetic with maculopathy? A pilot study
Eye (2001)
-
Assessment of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in the detection of sight-threatening diabetic maculopathy
Eye (1999)