Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Low Vision Aids—Is our service cost effective?

Abstract

A questionnaire and telephone survey was carried out on a Scottish population of patients with impaired vision, in order to ascertain the proportion of patients who gain benefit from Low Vision Aids (LVA) and to determine the number of LVAs which are retained but unused. One third of the patients who answered the questionnaire never use their LVAs, and one half were not satisfied with the service provided. A cost analysis indicated that approximately (£) 8,000 worth of LVAs are neither used nor returned each year to a single LVA service. The patients' ages, diagnoses, and visual acuities were related to the compliance rate. It appears that increasing age and decreasing visual acuity may be factors which decrease compliance. However none of the factors analysed could be used as a reliable predictor of patient satisfaction or of eventual benefit. Other health services which provide intensive training in the use of LVAs reportedly achieve a higher level of compliance. We conclude that our present service could probably be improved by the employment of additional staff specifically trained to teach patients how to make best use of the LVAs provided.

References

  1. Hertel E : Ueber Ersatz der operativen Korrektion hochgradiger Myopic durch eine glaeser Kombi- nation (Fernrohrbrille). Albrecht v. Graefes Arch Ophthal 1910; 75: 586–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Temel A : Low Vision Aids (evaluation of 185 patients). Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 327–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mancil GL and Nowakowski R : Evaluation of reading speed with four Low Vision Aids. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63: 708–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Humphry RC and Thompson GM : Low Vision Aids—Evaluation in a General Eye Department. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1986; 105: 296–303.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nilsson UL and Nilsson SFG : Rehabilitation of the visually handicapped with advanced macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol 1986; 62: 345–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanderson FG, Cumming AE, Polkingthorne PJ : A hospital rental system for Low Vision Aids. Aust NZ J Ophthalmology 1986; 14: 359–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodrich GL and Mehr EB : Eccentric viewing training and low vision aids: Current practice and implications of peripheral retinal research. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63: 119–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Romayanda N, Wong S, Elzeneiney IH, Chan GH : Prismatic scanning method for improving visual acuity in patients with low vision. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 937–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McIlwaine, G., Bell, J. & Dutton, G. Low Vision Aids—Is our service cost effective?. Eye 5, 607–611 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1991.105

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1991.105

Search

Quick links