Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The objective assessment of cataract

Eye volume 1, pages 234–246 (1987)Cite this article

Abstract

The objective assessment of cataract is central to any epidemiological or therapeutic study of cataract. The objective methods consist of:

1: A resolution target projection ophthalmoscope (Acuity scope) for the estimation of potential visual acuity.

2: The Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System, which records and quantifies the features of the lens that are visible at the slit-lamp microscope. This system is essential since photographic methods cannot define the morphology of cataract.

3: Two photographic methods; slit-lamp photography and retro-illumination photography are needed to give a comprehensive statement about the amount of cataract. The negatives are measured by computerised image analysis systems.

Download PDF

References

  1. Kador PF : Overview of the current attempts toward medical treatment of cataract. Ophthalmology 1983; 90: 352–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown NAP, Bron AJ : Medical therapy in the prevention of cataract. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK. 1985; 104: 748–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cotlier E : Senile cataracts: Evidence for acceleration by diabetes and deceleration by salicylate. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 1981; 16: 113–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cotlier E, Fagadau W, Cicchetti DV : Methods for evaluation of medical therapy of senile and diabetic cataracts. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK. 1982; 102: 416–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crews SJ : Posterior subcapsular lens opacities in patients on long term corticosteroid therapy. Br. Med. J. 1963; 1644–6.

  6. Pirie A : Colour and solubility of the proteins of human cataracts. Invest. Ophthalmol. 1968; 7: 634–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown N, Gardner RJM : Lowe Syndrome: Identification of the carrier state. In: The eye and inborn errors of metabolism. Ed: Bergsma D, Bron AJ, Cotlier EJP. 1976; 579–91.

  8. Clayton RM, Cuthbert J, Phillips CI, Bartholomew RS, Stokoe NL, Ffytche T, McK Reid J, Duffy J, Seth J, Alexander M : Analysis of individual cataract patients and their lenses: A progress report. Exp. Eye Res. 1980; 31: 553–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leibowitz HM, Krueger DE, Maunder LR, Milton RC, Kini MM, Kahn HA, Nickerson RJ, Pool J, Colton T, Ganley JP, Lowenstein JI, Dawber TR : The Framingham Eye Study Monograph. Surv. Ophthalmol. Suppl. 1980; 24: 350–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chylack LT : Classification of human cataractous change by the American co-operative cataract research group method. In: Human cataract formation. Ed: Nugent J, Whelan JJ. Pitman: London. (CIBA Foundation Symposium, 106.) 1984; 3–24.

  11. Hockwin D, Eckerskorn U, Schmidtmann W, Dragomirescu V, Korte I, Laser H : Epidemiological study of the association between lens cataract and case history, blood composition, and enzymes involved in lens carbohydrate metabolism. Lens Res. 1984; 2: 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chylack LT, Lee MR, Tung WH, Cheng HM : Classification of human senile cataractous change by the American co-operative cataract research group method. 1. Instrument and technique. Invest. Ophthalmol. 1983; 24: 424–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chylack LT, Ransil BJ, White O : Classification of human senile cataractous change by the American cooperative cataract research group method. I. the association of nuclear colour (sclerosis) with extent of cataract formation, age and visual acuity. Invest. Ophthalmol. 1984; 25: 174–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chylack LT, White O, Tung WH : Classification of human cataractous change by the American co-operative cataract research group method. 2. Staged simplification of cataract classification. Invest. Ophthalmol. 1984; 25: 166–73.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sparrow JM, Bron AJ, Brown NAP, Ayliffe W, Hill AH : Oxford clinical cataract classification and grading system. Int. Ophthalmol. 1986; 9: 207–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown N, Tripathi R : The loss of the anterior subcapsular clear zone of the lens. Prognostic significance in cataract formation. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK. 1974; 94: 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bron AJ, Brown NAP : Perinuclear lens retrodots: a role for ascorbate in cataractogenesis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1987; 71: 86–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Newhall SM, Nickerson D, Judd DB : Final report of the D.S.A. Subcommittee on the spacing of the Munsell colours. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1943; 33: 385–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sparrow JM, Ayliffe W, Hill A : (In preparation).

  20. Niesel Von P : Spaltlampenphotographie mit der Haag-Streit Spaltlampe 900. Ophthalmologica (Basel) 1966; 151: 489–504.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown N : Quantitative slit-image photography of the lens. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK. 1972; 92: 303–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hockwin O, Dragomirescu V : Die Scheimpflug-Photographie des vorden Augenabschnittes. Zeitschrift fur Praktische Augenheilkunde. 1981; 2: 129–36.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chylack LT, Cheng HM, White O, Rosner B : Variances associated with objective documentation in vivo of human cataractous change with Topcon SL-45 and Neitz lens photography. Proc. Int. Soc. Eye Res. III 1984; p. 143 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  24. West S, Rosenthal F, Newland HS, Taylor HR : A comparison of methods for typing and grading lens opacities for field surveys. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 1985; 26 (3): 119 (Suppl).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen SY, Chylack LT, White O : Topcon SL-45 Photography, a suitable technique for documenting nuclear, but not cortical cataractous changes in vivo. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1985; 26 (3): 119 (Suppl).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weiss JN, Rand LT, Gleason RE, Soledner HS : Laser light scattering spectroscopy of in vivo human lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1984; 25: 594–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laing RA, Bursell SE : In vivo photomicrography of the crystaline lens. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1981; 99: 688–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bron AJ, Matsuda K : Specular microscopy of the human lens. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK. 1981; 101: 163–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fincham EF : Photographic recording of opacities of the ocular media. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1955; 39: 85–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maclean H, Taylor CJ : An objective staging for cortical cataract in vivo aided by pattern-analysed computer. Exp. Eye Res. 1981; 33: 597–602.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kawara T, Obazawa H, Nakano R, Sasaki M, Sakati T : Quantitative evaluation of cataractous lens opacities with retro-illumination photography. Jpn. J. Clin. Ophthalmol. 1979; 33: 21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kawara T, Obazawa H : A new method for retroillumination photography of cataractous lens opacities. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1980; 90: 186–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Brown N : An advanced slit-image camera. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1972; 56: 624–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brown N : Photographic investigation of the human lens and cataract. Surv. Ophthalmol. 1979; 23: 307–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown N, Hungerford J : The influence of the size of the lens in ocular disease. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK. 1982; 102: 359–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hockwin O, Dragomirescu V, Laser H : Measurement of lens transparency of its disturbances by densitometric image analysis of Scheimpflug photographs. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1982; 219: 255–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chylack LT, White O, Sher L, Nodine M, Obazawa H : Objective measurement of cataractous growth in vivo. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1985; 26: 119.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brown N : Dating the onset of cataract. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK. 1976; 96: 18–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fleiss JL : Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons (1981).

  40. Hall JN : Inter-rates reliability of wart rating scales. Br. J. Psychiat. 1974; 125: 248–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Oxford

    Nicholas A P Brown, Anthony J Bron, William Ayliffe, John Sparrow & Adrian R Hill

Authors
  1. Nicholas A P Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony J Bron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William Ayliffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John Sparrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Adrian R Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, N., Bron, A., Ayliffe, W. et al. The objective assessment of cataract. Eye 1, 234–246 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1987.43

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1987.43

Further reading

Search

Advanced search

Quick links