To investigate the potential role of microRNA (miRNA) in the regulation of circadian rhythm, we performed microarray-based expression profiling study of both miRNA and mRNA in mouse liver for 48 h at 4-hour intervals. Circadian miRNA-mRNA target pair is defined as the pair both elements of which show circadian expression patterns and the sequence-based target relationship of which can be predicted. Circadian initiators, Clock and Bmal1, showed inversely correlated circadian expression patterns against their corresponding miRNAs, miR-181d and miR-191, targeting them. In contrast, circadian suppressors, Per, Cry, CKIe and Rev-erba, exhibited positively correlated circadian expression patterns to their corresponding miRNAs. Genomic location analysis revealed that intronic region showed higher abundance of cyclic than non-cyclic miRNAs targeting circadian genes while other (i.e., 3'-UTR, exon and intergenic) regions showed no difference. It is suggested that miRNAs are involved in the regulation of peripheral circadian rhythm in mouse liver by modulating Clock:Bmal1 complex. Identifying specific miRNAs and their targets that are critically involved in circadian rhythm will provide a better understanding of the regulation of circadian-clock system.
The circadian system in higher organisms temporally orchestrates rhythmic changes in a vast number of genes and gene products in different organs (Reppert and Weaver, 2001). Circadian rhythms of gene expression occur widely in peripheral organs. Analysis of "circadian proteome" revealed that the portion of cycling proteins is rather higher than that found in "circadian transcriptome", and that many of the cycling proteins show a constant abundance at the level of the mature transcript (Reddy et al., 2006). This discrepancy indicates that posttranscriptional and posttranslational mechanisms are important components of circadian rhythmicity. Therefore, it is important to identify the molecular basis of miRNA-mediated gene regulation of circadian timing in peripheral tissues.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNAs that act as potent silencers of gene expression (Lee et al., 1993; Pasquinelli et al., 2000; Lagos-Quintana et al., 2001; Lau et al., 2001; Lee and Ambros, 2001; Bartel, 2004). They recognize target mRNAs by base-pairing and thereby regulate their expression (Lewis et al., 2003; Kiriakidou et al., 2004). It is estimated that up to 30% of protein-coding genes are regulated by miRNAs (Krek et al., 2005; Lewis et al., 2005). They are involved in various biological processes such as developmental timing and patterning, apoptosis, cell proliferation, organ development and tumorigenesis (Hornstein et al., 2005; Wienholds and Plasterk, 2005). Most miRNAs are expressed in a tissue-dependent manner. With microarrays those tissue-specific miRNAs can be identified (Thomson et al., 2004).
The breadth of genetic regulatory effects potentially mediated by miRNAs and their central role in diverse cellular processes have led to the hypothesis that gene-expression changes of specific miRNAs may be correlated with the regulation of the circadian-clock initiators that are critically involved in circadian rhythm. The aim of the present study is to identify and characterize the miRNAs involved in the regulation of circadian rhythm. Not all of miRNAs showing circadian patterns are involved in circadian rhythm and miRNAs showing non-circadian patterns may also be involved in circadian rhythm. However, characterizing and analyzing such miRNAs is not considered in this paper. Here, we focus entirely on miRNAs that simultaneously have circadian expression patterns and target circadian genes. We asked the following questions: Can we find miRNAs having diurnal expression pattern? How can we characterize the cyclic miRNAs in terms of target relationships and/or genomic locations? Is miRNA a regulator of circadian genes?
MicroRNAs showing cyclic expression patterns and their targets
We found 85 (13.3%) among the 640 miRNAs probed having circadian expression patterns by the two statistical methods (r > 0.7 and P value < 0.05, see Method) (Table 1). Table 1 shows 70 miRNAs having circadian expression patterns including 39 human and 10 rat probes as well as 21 mouse probes. The 10 rat probes do not have homologue in mouse. Most of the human probes (38/39), however, were human homologues of mouse miRNA, as explained in the method section. Some of the one human and 10 rat probes without having mouse homology may be 'false positives'. Others may be 'true positive' mouse miRNAs having human or rat homologues that have not yet been determined. It may be worth validating as new mouse miRNA genes were discovered by homology search (Weber, 2005).
In the six four-hour interval groups ranging from ZT0 (the beginning of the subjective day) to ZT24 (the end of the subjective night, equal to ZT0), we found the following distribution of peaks (Figure 1): four genes in ZT4, 40 in ZT8, 13 in ZT12, nine in ZT16, 18 in ZT20 and one in ZT24.
Using TarBase (Sethupathy et al., 2006), we found that seven among the 85 cyclic miRNAs have experimentally validated mRNA targets. Table 1 demonstrates that they are oncogenes like KRAS and KIT and cell cycle regulatory protein like E2F1. FBXW1B belonging to F-box protein family is one of the targets. FBXL3 in the same F-box protein family has been reported to control the oscillation of the circadian clock by directing the degradation of cryptochrome proteins (Siepka et al., 2007). This finding suggests that cyclic miRNAs may be associated with circadian rhythm, cell cycle and oncogenes.
MicroRNAs targeting core circadian clock genes
Core circadian clock genes are defined as the genes whose protein products are necessary components for the generation and regulation of circadian rhythm (Lowrey and Takahashi, 2004). We selected twelve circadian genes from the current list of mammalian clock genes, Clock, Bmal1, Per1, Per2, Per3, Cry1, Cry2, Rev-erba, CKIe, Timeless, Npas2 and Bmal2 (Lowrey and Takahashi, 2004). To find miRNAs targeting these core clock genes, we used MiRanda (John et al., 2004) based on target prediction. We found that 205 (32%) among the 640 miRNAs probed are potentially targeting them.
We defined circadian miRNA-mRNA target pair as the pair both elements of which show circadian expression patterns (r > 0.7 and P value < 0.05, see Method) and whose sequence-based target relationship is established. Target relationships between the cyclic miRNAs and mRNAs are established by using MiRanda (John et al., 2004). Table 1 shows that 33 significant miRNA-mRNA target pairs are established between 24 miRNAs and 10 core clock genes. Per2 and Bmal2 among the core circadian clock genes are excluded because no cyclic miRNA targets them. When we applied TargetScan (Lewis et al., 2003) instead of MiRanda (John et al., 2004), 13 pairs are detected. MiRanda (John et al., 2004) and TargetScan (Lewis et al., 2003) require different base-pairing rules, cross-species conservation to identify potential miRNA binding sties. In order to compensate for limitations of their computational target prediction programs, we simultaneously showed the results by both of them.
Table 2 summarizes the 33 pairs with positive (n = 15) and negative (n = 18) correlation of expression between cyclic miRNAs and target core clock genes. Eleven among the 15 'negatively' correlated pairs (73.3%) targeted Clock, Bmal1 and Npas2, functioning as circadian initiators. The rest four pairs targeted Timeless. Timeless appeared four times in negatively and three times in positively correlated pairs in total but with very poor statistical significance (P value > 0.4). In contrast, 13 among the 18 'positively' correlated pairs (72.2%) targeted circadian suppressors like Per1, Per3, Cry1, Cry2, CKle, Rev-erba and Timeless. The rest five pairs targeted Npas2 and Bmal1 but with poor statistical significance (P value > 0.3). In summary, among the nine pairs with P values smaller than 0.05, statistically significant negative correlation was found only in circadian initiators, Clock (r = -0.82, P value = 0.001; r = -0.66, P value = 0.020) and Bmal1 (r = -0.68, P value = 0.015). Statistically significant positive correlation was found only in circadian suppressors, Per3 (r = 0.72, P value = 0.008), Cry1 (r = 0.65, P value = 0.021), Rev-erba (r = 0.80, P value = 0.002), CKIe (r = 0.69, P value = 0.014) and Per1 (r = 0.73, P value = 0.008) (Table 2). When we increased the P value threshold to 0.10, two 'negatively' correlated pairs targeting Clock (r = -0.51, P value = 0.087) were correctly added.
Correlation analysis shows the inverse (Figure 2A and 2B) and positive (Figure 2C-2E) correlations of expression patterns between targeting miRNA with circadian initiator and suppressor pairs, respectively. This finding strongly suggests that miRNAs may control circadian rhythm by regulating circadian transcription factors, Clock:Bmal1, and the negative feedback regulators. For validation, we performed RT-PCR on miR-191-Bmal1 and miR-328-Per1 pairs isolated from mouse liver, confirming robust circadian expression patterns (Figure 3).
Genomic distribution of cyclic and non-cyclic miRNAs targeting circadian genes was investigated (Table 3) using the miRBase Sequences database (Griffiths-Jones, 2004; Griffiths-Jones et al., 2006). While the relative frequencies of cyclic and non-cyclic ones among the miRNAs that do not target circadian genes did not show statistical difference (P value = 0.118 by Fisher's exact test) across different regions of the genome, those targeting circadian genes showed significant difference (P value = 0.013 by Fisher's exact test). Further analysis revealed that intronic miRNAs targeting circadian genes showed significantly higher abundance of cyclic versus non-cyclic miRNAs (17:53 = 0.321, P value = 0.0007 by Fisher's exact test) than all other regions (P value > 0.1) including intergenic (12:136 = 0.088), exonic (0:6 = 0.0), 3'-UTR (0:10 = 0.0), unknown (1:6 = 0.167) and the whole genome (24:181 = 0.132) regions (Table 3).
The present study showed the specific positive and negative correlation patterns of miRNA-mRNA target pairs in the circadian rhythm. Clock and Bmal1, which function as circadian transcription factors (Gekakis et al., 1998; Bunger et al., 2000), showed inversely correlated circadian expression patterns against their corresponding miRNAs, miR-181d and miR-191. In contrast, the components of negative feedback loop in the circadian rhythm, Per1 and Cry1, subject to Clock:Bmal1-mediated activation (Shearman et al., 2000), exhibited positively correlated circadian expression patterns to their corresponding miRNAs, miR-328 and miR-383.
Because miRNAs have been known to act as potent silencers of gene expression via translational repression or mRNA degradation as demonstrated in the circadian clock initiator, Clock:Bmal1 heterodimer, positive expression patterns between miRNAs and their targets as demonstrated in the circadian clock repressor, Per:Cry heterodimer, are unexpected. However, it has been shown that miRNAs may also function to induce gene expression (Place et al., 2008). Another possible explanation is that there can be a time lag between the inhibitory reaction and the resultant inhibition, resulting in positive correlation.
To characterize the targets of miRNAs with cyclic expression patterns, we used TarBase that houses a manually curated collection of experimentally tested miRNA targets, in view of considerable noise in miRNA target prediction. Experimental techniques used in TarBase are in vitro reporter gene assay and transgenic mice over-expressing a miRNA of interest. Verified targets of miRNAs with cyclic expression patterns are oncogenes like KRAS and KIT and cell cycle regulatory protein like E2F1. Besides, FBXW1B belonging to F-box protein family such as FBXL3, which control the circadian clock by directing the degradation of cryptochrome proteins is included. It is suggested that miRNAs with circadian expression patterns may be involved in the cyclic activity.
We found that cyclic miRNAs targeting circadian genes show relatively high frequency in the intron region compared to other regions. The biological significance of the observations is unclear. One possible explanation, however, is that some genes could quickly and exactly regulate their expression patterns by their intronic miRNAs, circumventing the long-delayed translation process in rapidly shifting environments (Lin et al., 2006). Protein-coding genes produce not only gene transcripts for its own protein synthesis but also intronic miRNAs, which may suppress the expression of other genes. In other words, those gene expressions may result in gain-of-function of itself and loss-of-function of others, having complementarity to the mature intronic miRNA. We can speculate that intron-mediated gene regulation may be as much important as transcription factor-mediated regulation of gene expression.
We attempt to define criteria for a miRNA to be a potential regulator of the circadian rhythm: (i) one displays cyclic expression pattern, (ii) one targets circadian genes, and (iii) one shows inverse correlation of expression pattern with predicted target (s). Target genes of miRNAs that were determined to satisfy these requirements were clock initiators, Clock and Bmal1 (Table 2, Figure 2 and 3). This finding indicates that miRNAs may specifically regulate circadian transcription factors among the several circadian rhythm-related genes. Thus, miRNAs may play a pivotal role in regulating circadian rhythm through circadian transcription factors.
Up to now, researchers have made many attempts to identify clock-associated miRNAs and their function in the circadian rhythm (Pegoraro and Tauber, 2008). Cheng et al. have revealed that miR-219 and miR-132 were shown to regulate the circadian clock in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus (Cheng et al., 2007). Another approach reported that circadian clocks regulate miRNA expression (dme-miR-263a and -263b) in Drosophila (Yang et al., 2008). Compared with their studies, one strength of the present study comes from the strategy of high-throughput co-expression analysis of mRNA and miRNA in the course of circadian rhythm. The circadian rhythm provides a strong constraint of cyclicity on both mRNA and miRNA expressions that filters out non-cyclic ones. Both RNAs are interconnected by the sequence-based target relationship that filters out non-interacting pairs. Cyclic expression of both RNAs can be further constrained by the statistical significance of correlation pattern analysis. These constraints enable an effective exploration of the plethora of complex networks.
Our study suggested that miRNAs including miR-181d and miR-191 are involved in the regulation of circadian rhythm by controlling the circadian transcription factor in mouse liver. Further study is required to identify the specific targets and networks of miRNAs in the circadian rhythm. Identifying specific miRNAs and their targets that are critically involved in circadian rhythm will provide a better understanding of circadian-clock regulation. This research suggests a previously unexplored layer of modulation to the circadian clock initiators through miRNAs.
We purchased 36 male C57BL/6J mice of 12 weeks of age. We entrained the mice to 12-h light and 12-h dark cycle (LD12:12) for four weeks. Liver sample were collected from three mice for each of the 12 time points with four-h interval for two complete circadian cycles. Hybridization was duplicated in miRNA and triplicated in mRNA expression profiling for each of the 12 pooled samples. Total RNA (including miRNA) from frozen liver tissues was isolated by using the mirVana RNA Isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
MicroRNA microarray hybridization
MiRNA isolated from the liver samples were labeled using the mirVana miRNA Array Labeling Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) and then fluorescently coupled with Cy3 or Cy5 using the NHS-ester CyDye™ fluors (Amersham Bioscience, Pittsburgh, PA). Hybridization to the mirVana miRNA Bioarrays (Ambion, Austin, TX) was conducted in duplicate with the mirVana miRNA Bioarray Essentials Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). The mirVana technology (Ambion, Austin, TX) profiles 640 human (hsa-mir, n = 328), mouse (mmu-mir, n = 114) and rat (rno-mir, n = 46), and Ambion proprietary human (ambi-mir, n = 152) miRNA sequences. It can be considered that there are in fact 266 mouse miRNA probes that consist of the mmu (n = 114) probes and the 152 among 328 human miRNA probes having well conserved sequence homology with mouse counterparts. Following hybridization, the miRNA arrays were scanned using a GenePix 4000A array scanner (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA).
MessengerRNA microarray hybridization
550 ng of total RNA isolated from mouse liver was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using a T7 oligo (dT) primer. Second-strand cDNA was synthesized and labeled with biotin-NTP. Biotin labeled cRNA probes synthesized with the Illumina TotalPrep RNA Amplification kit (Ambion). 0.85 µg of labeled cRNA samples were hybridized in triplicate to each Sentrix Mouse-6 Expression BeadChip (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). Detection of array signal was carried out following the BeadChip manual. Arrays were scanned with an Illumina Bead array Reader confocal scanner. mRNA expression data have been submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) with the series accession number GSE11516.
We treated 20 µg of total RNA with DNase (Ambion). cDNA was synthesized with an NCodeTM miRNA First Strand cDNA Synthesis RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) from 200 ng of treated RNA. PCR primers were as follows: mmumiR-191, 5'-CAACGGAATCCCAAAAGCAGCTG; has-miR-328, 5'-CTGGCCCTCTCTGCCCTTCC; Bmal1, 5'-AAGTGCAACAGGCCTTCAGT (sense strand) and 5'-GGTGGCCAGCTTTTCAAATA (antisense strand); Per-1, 5'-CTTCCCCCTGCTCCCACATC (sense strand) and 5'-AGTGGGAGGCCCTTCAGCAG (antisense strand). Quantitative PCR was done in triplicate on a 7000 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). For liver tissue sample, PCR was done in triplicate to minimize the variation. GAPDH was used as an endogenous control for gene expression.
The mRNA data set was normalized by "chip-wise" method using the rank invariant algorithm (Kuhn et al., 2004) and the miRNA data set was normalized by quantile normalization (Bolstad et al., 2003). We applied two statistical methods to find the genes showing circadian rhythm. We first applied the cosinor analysis method (r > 0.7 and P value < 0.05). A least-square cosine wave was fitted to the data to test for the periodicity of 24 h. Second, to find the genes that have periodic expression patterns that are not similar to cosine curves, we extracted the genes having significant positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient) between the first and the second day expression patterns (r > 0.7 and P value < 0.05). We extracted 85 miRNAs with diurnal expression pattern by combining the results of the two methods. Fisher's exact test was applied to examine the difference between cyclic and non-cyclic expression patterns across genomic regions.
This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea (M1072907-000107N290700110) and in part by a grant of the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family, Republic of Korea (0405-BC02-0604-0004).
gene Expression Omnibus
About this article
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018)