Letter | Published:

Letter

No evidence of association between complement factor I genetic variant rs10033900 and age-related macular degeneration

European Journal of Human Genetics volume 20, pages 12 (2012) | Download Citation

In 2008, an association between age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosome 4q25 was reported in this journal by Fagerness et al1 studying a large US-based sample of around 1200 cases with advanced AMD and 800 controls. The association signal extended over a region of about 175 kb, the most associated variant (P<10−7) being the SNP rs10033900 near the complement factor I (CFI) gene. Two replication studies2, 3 published also in this journal provided some additional support for an AMD susceptibility locus in this region. In the course of candidate gene studies of AMD, we had previously investigated SNPs spanning CFI including rs10033900 in a UK case–control sample, which shows the expected associations with the well-established AMD-susceptibility loci CFH, ARMS2, CFB and C3. No evidence of association with the CFI variants was observed. Following publication of the reports cited above we have typed rs10033900 in additional cases and controls in two independent samples from England and Scotland to investigate this further.

Full details of the phenotyping criteria have been reported previously.4 The English sample comprised of 859 cases with predominantly advanced AMD, either geographic atrophy (GA) or choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) and 423 examined controls. The Scottish sample consisted of 505 cases with either intermediate disease (age-related maculopathy, ARM) or advanced AMD, and 351 examined controls. Summary demographics of the two cohorts are detailed in Table 1. The English and Scottish samples were genotyped in separate laboratories using different methodologies (ABI Prism SNaPshot Multiplex Kit and Taqman SNP Genotyping Assay respectively, both from Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). No departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was observed either in the English (P=0.92) or in the Scottish (P=0.32) controls, and allele frequencies were almost identical (C allele, 50.1% and 49.6%, respectively). A genetic additive model was assessed using the Cochran–Armitage trend test and corresponding P-values are reported. ORs were calculated using referent C allele as per Fagerness et al1 and are presented with 95% CIs. A pooled OR with corresponding 95% CI and P-value was estimated using both English and Scottish samples using the Mantel–Haenszel (fixed-effects) method of meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between the two studies was assessed using the quantity I2 and χ2-test.

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the English and the Scottish subjects

Table 2 presents results from an association analysis between rs10033900 and advanced AMD in the English and Scottish samples together with a meta-analysis. The OR estimates showed no evidence of association in either cohort (English: OR=0.94, 95% CI=0.80–1.12; Scottish: OR=0.96, 95% CI=0.76–1.23). No heterogeneity between the two cohorts was observed. The Mantel–Haenszel summary OR (0.95, 95% CI=0.83–1.09, P=0.47) confirmed the lack of evidence of an association at SNP rs10033900 in these two independent samples. Adjusting the analysis for age or confining the analysis to cases with either CNV or GA, or including cases with intermediate disease (ARM), did not significantly alter the estimates (results not shown).

Table 2: Association analysis for SNP rs10033900 comparing cases of advanced AMD (GA or CNV) with controls in the English and the Scottish samples

Given the strong association signal reported by Fagerness et al1 and the fact that our study is comparably powered, it is surprising we could not replicate this finding. The study by Ennis et al2 is the only previous report based on a UK sample and failed to find significant evidence of association with rs10033900 (P=0.135). Kondo et al3 obtained weak evidence of an association with rs10033900 (P=0.036) in their Japanese sample and argued in favour of a recessive mode of inheritance (P=0.0035). Testing a recessive genetic model did not show significance in either of our UK samples (English sample: P=0.56; Scottish sample: P=0.60).

Recently, Neale et al5 reported a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of advanced AMD using largely the same sample as Fagerness et al1 but with additional controls. As in the earlier study, they found association with rs7690921 (P<10−3) in the CCDC109B gene 80 kb from rs10033900 (r2=0.40). Replication samples were studied and meta-analysis gave a stronger signal of association (P<10−8). Chen et al6 carried out another genome-wide investigation on a sample of around 2000 cases and 1000 controls, which confirmed previous evidence from Fagerness et al1 of an association with rs2285714 (P<10−6) in the PLA2G12 gene 20 kb from rs10033900 (r2=0.70). As the genotyping platforms used in these two GWASs did not include rs10033900, no conditional analysis was possible and the signals in CCDC109B and PLA2G12 were interpreted as a proxy for rs10033900. More recently, the GWAS by Kopplin et al7 did not report evidence of association (cut-off P<10−4) for the CFI locus in two discovery samples.

McCarthy et al8 have enumerated the possible explanations for failure to replicate a reported association as either the original finding being a false positive or the presence of some source of heterogeneity to which the difference in findings can be attributed, such as variable patterns of linkage disequilibrium between the genotyped SNP and untyped causal alleles, differences in the distribution, frequency or effect size of the causal alleles or the impact of non-additive interactions with other genetic variants or environmental exposures. For AMD, there have been several seemingly convincing reports of associations, which have not been replicated by subsequent studies, for example with SERPING19, 10, 11 and TLR3.12, 13, 14

On the available evidence it seems likely that variants at 4q25 do influence susceptibility to AMD. However, the variability observed in the results discussed above together with our complete lack of association for the index variant rs10033900 in two well-characterised independent UK samples leaves uncertainty as to which SNPs/genes are most strongly associated across different populations. Additional studies and a meta-analysis of the data are needed to clarify the nature of the association between AMD and variants in the extended CFI region.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , , , : Variation near complement factor I is associated with risk of advanced AMD. Eur J Hum Genet 2009; 17: 100–104.

  2. 2.

    , , , , : Support for the involvement of complement factor I in age-related macular degeneration. Eur J Hum Genet 2010; 18: 15–16.

  3. 3.

    , , , : Additional evidence to support the role of a common variant near the complement factor I gene in susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Eur J Hum Genet 2010; 18: 634–635.

  4. 4.

    , , et al: Complement C3 variant and the risk of age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 553–561.

  5. 5.

    , , et al: Genome-wide association study of advanced age-related macular degeneration identifies a role of the hepatic lipase gene (LIPC). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 7395–7400.

  6. 6.

    , , et al: Genetic variants near TIMP3 and high-density lipoprotein-associated loci influence susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 7401–7406.

  7. 7.

    , , et al: Genome-wide association identifies SKIV2L and MYRIP as protective factors for age-related macular degeneration. Genes Immun 2010; 11: 609–621.

  8. 8.

    , , et al: Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9: 356–369.

  9. 9.

    , , et al: Association between the SERPING1 gene and age-related macular degeneration: a two-stage case-control study. Lancet 2008; 372: 1828–1834.

  10. 10.

    , , et al: International AMD Genetics Consortium. The SERPING1 gene and age-related macular degeneration. Lancet 2009; 374: 875–876.

  11. 11.

    , , , , : Common variation in the SERPING1 gene is not associated with age-related macular degeneration in two independent groups of subjects. Mol Vis 2009; 15: 200–207.

  12. 12.

    , , et al: Toll-like receptor 3 and geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1456–1463.

  13. 13.

    , , et al: International Age-related Macular Degeneration Genetics Consortium. Geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration and TLR3. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2252–2254.

  14. 14.

    , , : Geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration and TLR3. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2254–2255.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has received funding from the Medical Research Council, United Kingdom (JRWY, ATM, DGC), the Macular Disease Society (JRWY, ATM), Guide Dogs for the Blind Association (ATM, JRWY, DGC, CB), the Wellcome Trust (DGC), the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (DGC), the Macula Vision Research Foundation (AFW), the Chief Scientist Office, Scotland (AFW, BD, CH), the Department of Health's NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (PB) and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology (JRWY). The views expressed in the publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College, London, UK

    • Valentina Cipriani
    • , Anthony T Moore
    •  & John RW Yates
  2. Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK

    • Valentina Cipriani
    • , Catey Bunce
    • , Anthony T Moore
    •  & John RW Yates
  3. Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, UK

    • Baljinder K Matharu
    • , Jane C Khan
    • , Humma Shahid
    • , David G Clayton
    •  & John RW Yates
  4. Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh, UK

    • Caroline Hayward
    •  & Alan F Wright
  5. Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh, UK

    • Ana Maria Armbrecht
    •  & Baljean Dhillon
  6. Ophthalmology Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    • Simon P Harding
  7. School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    • Paul N Bishop
  8. Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

    • Paul N Bishop

Authors

  1. Search for Valentina Cipriani in:

  2. Search for Baljinder K Matharu in:

  3. Search for Jane C Khan in:

  4. Search for Humma Shahid in:

  5. Search for Caroline Hayward in:

  6. Search for Alan F Wright in:

  7. Search for Ana Maria Armbrecht in:

  8. Search for Baljean Dhillon in:

  9. Search for Simon P Harding in:

  10. Search for Paul N Bishop in:

  11. Search for Catey Bunce in:

  12. Search for David G Clayton in:

  13. Search for Anthony T Moore in:

  14. Search for John RW Yates in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Cipriani.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2011.118

Further reading