Food and health

The effects of a multispecies probiotic on migraine and markers of intestinal permeability–results of a randomized placebo-controlled study

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Migraine, associated with several gastrointestinal disorders, may result from increased intestinal permeability, allowing endotoxins to enter the bloodstream. We tested whether probiotics could reduce migraine through an effect on intestinal permeability and inflammation.

Subjects/Methods:

In total, 63 patients were randomly allocated to the probiotic (n=31) or the placebo group (n=32). Participants ingested a multispecies probiotic (5x109 colony-forming units) or placebo daily for 12 weeks. Migraine was assessed with the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), the Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) and headache diaries. At baseline and 12 weeks, intestinal permeability was measured with the urinary lactulose/mannitol test and fecal and serum zonulin; inflammation was measured from interleukin (IL) -6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-α and C-reactive protein in serum.

Results:

The MIDAS migraine intensity score significantly decreased in both groups (P<0.001) and the HDI score significantly decreased in the probiotic group (P=0.032) and borderline in the placebo group (P=0.053). In the probiotics group, patients had a median of 6 migraine days in the first month, 4 in the second month (P=0.002) and 5 in the last month, which was not significantly different from the 5, 4, and 4 days in the placebo group. A 2day reduction in migraine days was seen in 12/31 patients in the probiotics group versus 7/29 in the placebo group (ns). Probiotic use did not significantly affect medication use, intestinal permeability or inflammation compared to placebo.

Conclusions:

In this study, we could not confirm significant benefit from a multispecies probiotic compared to a placebo on the outcome parameters of migraine and intestinal integrity.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

References

  1. 1

    Stovner L, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton R, Scher A et al. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    The World Health Report 2001 Mental Health, New Understanding, New Hope.. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.

  3. 3

    Olesen J . International Headache Society Classification Subcommittee. International classification of headache disorders Cephalalgia 2004; 24 (suppl 1), 1–160.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Samsam M, Covenas R, Ahangari R, Yajeya J . Neuropeptides and other chemical mediators, and the role of anti-inflammatory drugs in primary headaches. Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem 2010; 9: 170–188.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Burstein R, Noseda R, Borsook D . Migraine: multiple processes, complex pathophysiology. J Neurosci 2015; 35: 6619–6629.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Wang S-J, Chen P-K, Fuh J-L . Comorbidities of migraine. Front Neurol 2010; 1: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Waeber C, Moskowitz MA . Migraine as an inflammatory disorder. Neurology 2005; 64: S9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Monteith TS, Goadsby PJ . Acute migraine therapy: new drugs and new approaches. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; 13: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Aamodt AH, Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Zwart JA . Comorbidity of headache and gastrointestinal complaints. The Head-HUNT Study. Cephalalgia 2008; 28: 144–151.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    van Hemert S, Breedveld AC, Rovers JM, Vermeiden JP, Witteman BJ, Smits MG et al. Migraine associated with gastrointestinal disorders: review of the literature and clinical implications. Front Neurol 2014; 5: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Duerksen DR, Wilhelm-Boyles C, Parry DM . Intestinal permeability in long-term follow-up of patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet. Dig Dis Sci 2005; 50: 785–790.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Kerckhoffs APM, Akkermans LMA, MBM de Smet, MGH Besselink, Hietbrink F, Bartelink IH et al. Intestinal permeability in irritable bowel syndrome patients: effects of NSAIDs. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 716–723.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Piche T, Barbara G, Aubert P, des Varannes SB, Dainese R, Nano JL et al. Impaired intestinal barrier integrity in the colon of patients with irritable bowel syndrome: involvement of soluble mediators. Gut 2009; 58: 196–201.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Salim SY, Soderholm JD . Importance of disrupted intestinal barrier in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011; 17: 362–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Marchiando AM, Graham WV, Turner JR . Epithelial barriers in homeostasis and disease. Annu Rev Pathol 2010; 5: 119–144.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Parlesak A, Schafer C, Schutz T, Bode JC, Bode C . Increased intestinal permeability to macromolecules and endotoxemia in patients with chronic alcohol abuse in different stages of alcohol-induced liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2000; 32: 742–747.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Covelli V, Pellegrino NM, Jirillo E . A point of view: the need to identify an antigen in psyconeuroimmunological disorders. Curr Pharm Des 2003; 9: 1951–1955.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Mennigen R, Bruewer M . Effect of probiotics on intestinal barrier function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009; 1165: 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Scaldaferri F, Gerardi V, Lopetuso LR, Del Zompo F, Mangiola F, Boskoski I et al. Gut Microbial flora, prebiotics, and probiotics in IBD: their current usage and utility. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013: 435268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Stepankova R, Hudcovic T, Tuckova L, Cukrowska B, Lodinova-Zadnikova R et al. Commensal bacteria (normal microflora), mucosal immunity and chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Immunol Lett 2004; 93: 97–108.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Scaldaferri F, Pizzoferrato M, Gerardi V, Lopetuso L, Gasbarrini A . The gut barrier: new acquisitions and therapeutic approaches. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46 (Suppl), S12–S17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Kelly JR, Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G, Hyland NP . Breaking down the barriers: the gut microbiome, intestinal permeability and stress-related psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Neurosci 2015; 9: 392.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Farhadi A, Banan A, Fields J, Keshavarzian A . Intestinal barrier: an interface between health and disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 18: 479–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Ohland CL, Macnaughton WK . Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2010; 298: G807–G819.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Miyauchi E, O'Callaghan J, Butto LF, Hurley G, Melgar S, Tanabe S et al. Mechanism of protection of transepithelial barrier function by Lactobacillus salivarius: strain-dependence and attenuation by bacteriocin production. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2012; 303: G1029–G1041.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Anderson RC, Cookson AL, McNabb WC, Kelly WJ, Roy NC . Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 2648 is a potential probiotic that enhances intestinal barrier function. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2010; 309: 184–192.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Sensenig J, Johnson M, Staverosky T . Treatment of migraine with targeted nutrition focused on improved assimilation and elimination. Altern Med Rev 2001; 6: 488–494.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    de Roos N, Giezenaar C, Rovers J, Witteman B, Smits M, van Hemert S . The effects of the multispecies probiotic mixture Ecologic® Barrier on migraine: results of an open-label pilot study. Benef Microbes 2015; 6: 641–646.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Diener HC, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dahlof C, Lainez MJ, Sandrini G, Wang SJ et al. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis—results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control. J Neurol 2004; 251: 943–950.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Pfaffenrath V, Diener HC, Fischer M, Friede M, Henneicke-von Zepelin HH . Investigators. The efficacy and safety of Tanacetum parthenium (feverfew) in migraine prophylaxis—a double-blind, multicentre, randomized placebo-controlled dose-response study. Cephalalgia 2002; 22: 523–532.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Bensenor IM, Cook NR, Lee IM, Chown MJ, Hennekens CH, Buring JE . Low-dose aspirin for migraine prophylaxis in women. Cephalalgia 2001; 21: 175–183.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Steenbergen L, Sellaro R, van Hemert S, Bosch JA, Colzato LS . A randomized controlled trial to test the effect of multispecies probiotics on cognitive reactivity to sad mood. Brain Behav Immun 2015; 48: 258–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner K . Migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score: relation to headache frequency, pain intensity, and headache symptoms. Headache 2003; 43: 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Jacobson GP, Ramadan NM, Aggarwal SK, Newman CW . The Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI). Neurology 1994; 44: 837–842.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Holroyd KA, Malinoski P, Davis MK, Lipchik GL . The three dimensions of headache impact: pain, disability and affective distress. Pain 1999; 83: 571–578.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Uil JJ, van Elburg RM, Janssens PM, Mulder CJ, Heymans HS . Sensitivity of a hyperosmolar or "low"-osmolar test solution for sugar absorption in recognizing small intestinal mucosal damage in coeliac disease. Dig Liver Dis 2000; 32: 195–200.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Jansen G, Muskiet FA, Schierbeek H, Berger R, van der Slik W . Capillary gas chromatographic profiling of urinary, plasma and erythrocyte sugars and polyols as their trimethylsilyl derivatives, preceded by a simple and rapid prepurification method. Clin Chim Acta 1986; 157: 277–293.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Smecuol E, Sugai E, Niveloni S, Vazquez H, Pedreira S, Mazure R et al. Permeability, zonulin production, and enteropathy in dermatitis herpetiformis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Arrieta MC, Bistritz L, Meddings JB . Alterations in intestinal permeability. Gut 2006; 55: 1512–1520.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Fasano A . Leaky gut and autoimmune diseases. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2012; 42: 71–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Fasano A . Zonulin and its regulation of intestinal barrier function: the biological door to inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Physiol Rev 2011; 91: 151–175.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Lamprecht M, Bogner S, Schippinger G, Steinbauer K, Fankhauser F, Hallstroem S et al. Probiotic supplementation affects markers of intestinal barrier, oxidation, and inflammation in trained men; a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2012; 9: 45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Hietbrink F, Besselink MGH, Renooij W, de Smet MBM, Draisma A, van der Hoeven H et al. Systemic inflammation increases intestinal permeability during experimental human endotoxemia. Shock 2009; 32: 374–378.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Teshima CW, Meddings JB . The measurement and clinical significance of intestinal permeability. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2008; 10: 443–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Bischoff SC, Barbara G, Buurman W, Ockhuizen T, Schulzke JD, Serino M et al. Intestinal permeability—a new target for disease prevention and therapy. BMC Gastroenterol 2014; 14: 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Boirivant M, Strober W . The mechanism of action of probiotics. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2007; 23: 679–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    van Baarlen P, Wells JM, Kleerebezem M . Regulation of intestinal homeostasis and immunity with probiotic lactobacilli. Trends Immunol 2013; 34: 208–215.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Abraha I, Montedori A . Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ 2010; 340: c2697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 2008; 28: 484–495.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Lipton RB . Inflaming the need for migraine biomarkers. Neurology 2014; 83: 2198–2199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Streel S, Donneau AF, Hoge A, Albert A, Schoenen J, Guillaume M . One-year prevalence of migraine using a validated extended French version of the ID Migraine: a Belgian population-based study. Rev Neurol 2015; 171: 707–714.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Burch RC, Loder S, Loder E, Smitherman TA . The prevalence and burden of migraine and severe headache in the United States: updated statistics from government health surveillance studies. Headache 2015; 55: 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Reid G, Gaudier E, Guarner F, Huffnagle GB, Macklaim JM, Munoz AM et al. Responders and non-responders to probiotic interventions: how can we improve the odds? Gut Microbes 2010; 1: 200–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Hungin AP, Mulligan C, Pot B, Whorwell P, Agreus L, Fracasso P et al. Systematic review: probiotics in the management of lower gastrointestinal symptoms in clinical practice — an evidence-based international guide. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38: 864–886.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Macedo A, Banos JE, Farre M . Placebo response in the prophylaxis of migraine: a meta-analysis. Eur J Pain 2008; 12: 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Gaul C, Diener HC, Danesch U . Migravent Study G. Improvement of migraine symptoms with a proprietary supplement containing riboflavin, magnesium and Q10: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial. J Headache Pain 2015; 16: 516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Buettner C, Nir RR, Bertisch SM, Bernstein C, Schain A, Mittleman MA et al. Simvastatin and vitamin D for migraine prevention: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol 2015; 78: 970–981.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Miller LE, Ouwehand AC . Probiotic supplementation decreases intestinal transit time: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 4718–4725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Goldenberg JZ, Lytvyn L, Steurich J, Parkin P, Mahant S, Johnston BC Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (22): CD004827.

  60. 60

    Ouwehand AC . A review of dose-responses of probiotics in human studies. Benef Microbes 2016; 23: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Ulluwishewa D, Anderson RC, McNabb WC, Moughan PJ, Wells JM, Roy NC . Regulation of tight junction permeability by intestinal bacteria and dietary components. J Nutr 2011; 141: 769–776.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Horvath A, Leber B, Schmerboeck B, Tawdrous M, Zettel G, Hartl A et al. Randomised clinical trial: the effects of a multispecies probiotic vs. placebo on innate immune function, bacterial translocation and gut permeability in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 44: 926–935.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Fasano A . Zonulin, regulation of tight junctions, and autoimmune diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012; 1258: 25–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Moreno-Navarrete JM, Sabater M, Ortega F, Ricart W, Fernandez-Real JM . Circulating zonulin, a marker of intestinal permeability, is increased in association with obesity-associated insulin resistance. PLoS One 2012; 7: e37160.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Sapone A, de Magistris L, Pietzak M, Clemente MG, Tripathi A, Cucca F et al. Zonulin upregulation is associated with increased gut permeability in subjects with type 1 diabetes and their relatives. Diabetes 2006; 55: 1443–1449.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Pacifico L, Bonci E, Marandola L, Romaggioli S, Bascetta S, Chiesa C . Increased circulating zonulin in children with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 17107–17114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Dastych M, Dastych Jr M, Novotna H, Cihalova J . Lactulose/mannitol test and specificity, sensitivity, and area under curve of intestinal permeability parameters in patients with liver cirrhosis and Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 2789–2792.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Uil JJ, van Elburg RM, van Overbeek FM, Mulder CJ, VanBerge-Henegouwen GP, Heymans HS . Clinical implications of the sugar absorption test: intestinal permeability test to assess mucosal barrier function. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1997; 223: 70–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    van Hemert S, Verwer J, Schütz B . Clinical studies evaluating effects of probiotics on parameters of intestinal barrier function. Adv Microbiol 2013; 3: 212–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Zeng J, Li YQ, Zuo XL, Zhen YB, Yang J, Liu CH . Clinical trial: effect of active lactic acid bacteria on mucosal barrier function in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 28: 994–1002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71

    Uzar E, Evliyaoglu O, Yucel Y, Ugur Cevik M, Acar A, Guzel I et al. Serum cytokine and pro-brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in patients with migraine. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2011; 15: 1111–1116.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72

    Wang F, He Q, Ren Z, Li F, Chen W, Lin X et al. Association of serum levels of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and interleukin-6 with migraine. Neurol Sci 2015; 36: 535–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73

    Gudmundsson LS, Aspelund T, Scher AI, Thorgeirsson G, Johannsson M, Launer LJ et al. C-reactive protein in migraine sufferers similar to that of non-migraineurs: the Reykjavik Study. Cephalalgia 2009; 29: 1301–1310.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74

    Vanmolkot FH, de Hoon JN . Increased C-reactive protein in young adult patients with migraine. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 843–846.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75

    Tanik N, Celikbilek A, Metin A, Gocmen AY, Inan LE . Retinol-binding protein-4 and hs-CRP levels in patients with migraine. Neurol Sci 2015; 36: 1823–1827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76

    Rajkumar H, Mahmood N, Kumar M, Varikuti SR, Challa HR, Myakala SP . Effect of probiotic (VSL#3) and omega-3 on lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, inflammatory markers, and gut colonization in overweight adults: a randomized, controlled trial. Mediators Inflamm 2014; 2014: 348959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77

    Asemi Z, Zare Z, Shakeri H, Sabihi SS, Esmaillzadeh A . Effect of multispecies probiotic supplements on metabolic profiles, hs-CRP, and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes. Ann Nutr Metab 2013; 63: 1–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78

    Jafarnejad S, Saremi S, Jafarnejad F, Arab A . Effects of a multispecies probiotic mixture on glycemic control and inflammatory status in women with gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Nutr Metab 2016; 2016: 5190846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79

    McNaught CE, Woodcock NP, Anderson AD, MacFie J . A prospective randomised trial of probiotics in critically ill patients. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology of Wageningen UR. The probiotic product was provided free of charge by Winclove Probiotics, the Netherlands. We thank the volunteers for taking part in this study; master students Simone van Dorresteijn, Carina Flux, Sara Lookman, Nienke Schipper and Riani Witaningrum for organizing and performing the study or analyzing samples; Ms Nhien Ly for analyzing zonulin and cytokines; Mr Robert Hovenier for performing the L/M tests; and Laura Hettinga for assisting in the data analysis.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N M de Roos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

SvH is employee of Winclove Probiotics. SvH has no direct or additional financial interest. The remaining authors declared no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Roos, N., van Hemert, S., Rovers, J. et al. The effects of a multispecies probiotic on migraine and markers of intestinal permeability–results of a randomized placebo-controlled study. Eur J Clin Nutr 71, 1455–1462 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2017.57

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links