Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Challenge in interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies using lactase persistence as instrumental variable

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Yang Q, Lin SL, Au Yeung SL, Kwok MK, Xu L, Leung GM et al. Genetically predicted milk consumption and bone health, ischemic heart disease and type 2 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2017; 71: 1008–1012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burgess S, Thompson SG . Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol 2011; 40: 755–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amiri M, Diekmann L, von Kockritz-Blickwede M, Naim HY . The diverse forms of lactose intolerance and the putative linkage to several cancers. Nutrients 2015; 7: 7209–7230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sacerdote C, Guarrera S, Smith GD, Grioni S, Krogh V, Masala G et al. Lactase persistence and bitter taste response: instrumental variables and mendelian randomization in epidemiologic studies of dietary factors and cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 166: 576–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergholdt HK, Nordestgaard BG, Ellervik C . Milk intake is not associated with low risk of diabetes or overweight-obesity: a Mendelian randomization study in 97,811 Danish individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 102: 487–496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hjartaker A, Lagiou A, Slimani N, Lund E, Chirlaque MD, Vasilopoulou E et al. Consumption of dairy products in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort: data from 35 955 24-hour dietary recalls in 10 European countries. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 1259–1271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Itan Y, Powell A, Beaumont MA, Burger J, Thomas MG . The origins of lactase persistence in Europe. PLoS Comput Biol 2009; 5: e1000491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Itan Y, Jones BL, Ingram CJ, Swallow DM, Thomas MG . A worldwide correlation of lactase persistence phenotype and genotypes. BMC Evol Biol 2010; 10: 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith GD, Lawlor DA, Timpson NJ, Baban J, Kiessling M, Day IN et al. Lactase persistence-related genetic variant: population substructure and health outcomes. Eur J Hum Genet 2009; 17: 357–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D . Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 904–909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipsitch M, Tchetgen Tchetgen E, Cohen T . Negative controls: a tool for detecting confounding and bias in observational studies. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L E T Vissers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vissers, L., van der Schouw, Y. & Sluijs, I. Challenge in interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies using lactase persistence as instrumental variable. Eur J Clin Nutr 72, 179–180 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2017.128

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2017.128

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links