Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The association of weight, weight variability and socioeconomic situation among children

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

We studied the association of body weight and weight variability among populations from different geographic, historic and socioeconomic background.

Subjects/Methods:

We reanalyzed data from 833 growth studies of 78 different countries from 1920 to 2013. We used data from two age groups—infants (age 2 years) and juvenile (age 7 years)—and divided the studies into two geographic-socioeconomic groups.

Results:

Multiple regressions showed significant interactions between weight, sex, historic year of study, continent and within-study standard deviation. Multiple regression revealed R2=0.256 (P<0.001) at age 2 years and R2=0.478 (P<0.001) at age 7 years. Although infants and juveniles in more affluent countries are heavier than children in less affluent countries (P<0.001), the within-study standard deviation of the two geographic-socioeconomic groups differs at age 7 years (P<0.001) but not at age 2 years (P>0.15).

Conclusions:

The general impression that prosperous conditions lead to growth improvements in height and weight appears to be true only at a large scale: wealthy countries have tall and heavy children. At small scale, the situation is different. Whereas economic and nutritional improvements can exhibit substantial effects in weight gains, the discrepancy between the within-population variation in height and weight strongly suggests that height gains and weight gains are subject to different regulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bogin B . Patterns of Human Growth, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O’Dea JA, Caputi P . Association between socioeconomic status, weight, age and gender, and the body image and weight control practices of 6- to 19-year-old children and adolescents. Health Educ Res 2001; 16: 521–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Y, Zhang Q . Are American children and adolescents of low socioeconomic status at increased risk of obesity? Changes in the association between overweight and family income between 1971 and 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84: 707–716.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gnavi R, Spagnoli TD, Galotto C, Pugliese E, Carta A, Cesari L . Socioeconomic status, overweight and obesity in prepuberal children: a study in an area of Northern Italy. Eur J Epidemiol 2000; 16: 797–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bielicki T . Physical growth as a measure of the economic well-being of populations: the twentieth century. In: Falkner F, Tanner JM (eds). Human Growth: A Comprehensive Treatise. Volume 3: Methodology and Ecological Genetic and Nutritional Effects on Growth, 2nd edn. Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986, pp 283–305.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Peck AM, Vågerö DH . Adult body height and childhood socioeconomic group in the Swedish population. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1987; 41: 333–337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murasko JE . Socioeconomic status, height, and obesity in children. Econ Hum Biol 2009; 7: 376–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Komlos J . Height and social status in eighteenth-century Germany. J Interdiscipl Hist 1990; 20: 607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Silventoinen K, Lahelma E, Rahkonen O . Social background, adult body-height and health. Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28: 911–918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fogel RW . Physical Growth as a Measure of the Economic Well-being of Populations: The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison GA . Temperature adaptation as evidenced by growth of mice. Fed Proc 1963; 22: 691–698.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrison GA, Schmitt LH . Variability in stature growth. Ann Hum Biol 1989; 16: 45–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanner JM . Growth as a mirror of the condition of society. secular trends and class distinctions. Pediatr Int 1987; 29: 96–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ipsen J, Nowak-Szczepanska N, Gomula A, Aßmann C, Hermanussen M . The association of body height, height variability and inequality. Anthropol Anz 2015, e-pub ahead of print 13 Dec 2015 doi:10.1127/anthranz/2015/0623.

  15. Aßmann C, Hermanussen M . Modeling determinants of growth: evidence for a community-based target in height? Pediatr Res 2013; 74: 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hermanussen M, Alt C, Staub K, Aßmann C, Groth D . The impact of physical connectedness on body height in Swiss conscripts. Anthropol Anz 2014; 71: 313–327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Uauy R, Albala C, Kain J . Obesity trends in Latin America: transiting from under- to overweight. J Nutr 2001; 131: 893–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Auxological Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auxologie).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Mumm.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mumm, R., Ipsen, M. & Hermanussen, M. The association of weight, weight variability and socioeconomic situation among children. Eur J Clin Nutr 70, 650–652 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.21

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.21

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links