Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Lipids and cardiovascular/metabolic health

The influence of adjustment for energy misreporting on relations of cake and cookie intake with cardiometabolic disease risk factors

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Previous cohort studies elucidated unexpected inverse relations of cake and cookie (CC) consumption with chronic disease risk. We assessed CC intake in relation to cardiometabolic disease risk factors in a well-phenotyped population with emphasis on misreporting as the potential driving force behind inverse relations.

Subjects/Methods:

In a cross-sectional EPIC-Potsdam sub-study individual usual CC intake was modeled by combining 24 h recall and food frequency questionnaire data. Cardiometabolic risk factors were anthropometry, blood lipids, blood pressure (BP), physical activity and fitness. Analysis of covariance models adjusted for (i) age/education/lifestyle and (ii) additionally for energy misreporting (ratio of energy intake over energy expenditure) were used to compute mean values of risk factors for quartiles of CC intake.

Results:

Adjustment for misreporting had considerable impact on relations of CC intake. Initial inverse links with anthropometry were reversed to direct associations. Misreporting adjustment also nullified inverse relations with triglycerides and with total cholesterol in women. Negligible associations with high density lipoprotein cholesterol turned inverse (men: cross-quartile difference (ΔQ4-Q1)=−1.7 mg/dl; women: ΔQ4-Q1=−3.6 mg/dl), so did fitness (men: ΔQ4-Q1=−1.2 ml/kg/min; women: ΔQ4-Q1=−0.9 ml/kg/min). Direct relations with total/low density lipoprotein cholesterol in men were not changed by misreporting (ΔQ4-Q1 max. 7.5 or 11.3 mg/dl). Reduced BP was observed in females with increased CC intake; only systolic BP remained relevant after misreporting adjustment (ΔQ4-Q1=−4.6 mmHg).

Conclusions:

The strong impact of energy misreporting on relations of CC intake with risk factors emphasizes a careful analysis and interpretation of nutritional data. We showed that apparent favorable relations of CC intake changed with a different model specification, highlighting proper modeling considerations when analyzing diet–disease relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buijsse B, Boeing H, Drogan D, Schulze MB, Feskens EJ, Amiano P et al. Consumption of fatty foods and incident type 2 diabetes in populations from eight European countries. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014; 69: 455–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. von Ruesten A, Feller S, Bergmann MM, Boeing H . Diet and risk of chronic diseases: results from the first 8 years of follow-up in the EPIC-Potsdam study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67: 412–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Colditz GA, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Willett WC, Speizer FE . Diet and risk of clinical diabetes in women. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 55: 1018–1023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lundgren H, Bengtsson C, Blohme G, Isaksson B, Lapidus L, Lenner RA et al. Dietary habits and incidence of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in a population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 49: 708–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steffen A, Sorensen TI, Knuppel S, Travier N, Sanchez MJ, Huerta JM et al. Development and validation of a risk score predicting substantial weight gain over 5 years in middle-aged European men and women. PloS One 2013; 8: e67429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Floegel A, Wientzek A, Bachlechner U, Jacobs S, Drogan D, Prehn C et al. Linking diet, physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and obesity to serum metabolite networks: findings from a population-based study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014; 38: 1388–1396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. House BT, Shearrer GE, Miller SJ, Pasch KE, Goran MI, Davis JN . Increased eating frequency linked to decreased obesity and improved metabolic outcomes. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015; 39: 136–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicklas TA, O'Neil CE, Fulgoni VL 3rd . Snacking patterns, diet quality, and cardiovascular risk factors in adults. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dhurandhar NV, Schoeller D, Brown AW, Heymsfield SB, Thomas D, Sorensen TI et al. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015; 39: 1109–1113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendez MA, Popkin BM, Buckland G, Schroder H, Amiano P, Barricarte A et al. Alternative methods of accounting for underreporting and overreporting when measuring dietary intake-obesity relations. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173: 448–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Illner AK, Harttig U, Tognon G, Palli D, Salvini S, Bower E et al. Feasibility of innovative dietary assessment in epidemiological studies using the approach of combining different assessment instruments. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14: 1055–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nothlings U, Hoffmann K, Bergmann MM, Boeing H . Fitting portion sizes in a self-administered food frequency questionnaire. J Nutr 2007; 137: 2781–2786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Kroke A, Boeing H . Dietary patterns and their association with food and nutrient intake in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam study. Br J Nutr 2001; 85: 363–373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Voss S, Charrondiere UR, Slimani N, Kroke A, Riboli E, Wahrendorf J et al. EPIC-SOFT ein europäisches Computerprogramm für 24-Stunden-Erinnerungsprotokolle. Z Ernährungswiss 1998; 37: 227–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tooze JA, Midthune D, Dodd KW, Freedman LS, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF et al. A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J Am Diet Assoc 2006; 106: 1575–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kipnis V, Midthune D, Buckman DW, Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Krebs-Smith SM et al. Modeling data with excess zeros and measurement error: application to evaluating relationships between episodically consumed foods and health outcomes. Biometrics 2009; 65: 1003–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. National Cancer Institute. Usual Dietary Intakes: SAS Macros for Analysis of a Single Dietary Component 2015. Available from http://epi.grants.cancer.gov/diet/usualintakes/macros_single.html?&url=/diet/usualintakes/macros_single.html (accessed on 3 August 2015).

  18. Wientzek A, Tormo Diaz MJ, Castano JM, Amiano P, Arriola L, Overvad K et al. Cross-sectional associations of objectively measured physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and anthropometry in European adults. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md) 2014; 22: E127–E134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ . Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59: 561–570.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brage S, Ekelund U, Brage N, Hennings MA, Froberg K, Franks PW et al. Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and accelerometry to measure physical activity. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2007; 103: 682–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wong MY, Andersen LB et al. Branched equation modeling of simultaneous accelerometry and heart rate monitoring improves estimate of directly measured physical activity energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2004; 96: 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Camntech. The Actiheart USER MANUAL, version 4.0.109. 2013. Available from http://www.camntech.com/images/products/actiheart/The_Actiheart_User_Manual.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2015).

  23. Wientzek A, Vigl M, Steindorf K, Bruhmann B, Bergmann MM, Harttig U et al. The improved physical activity index for measuring physical activity in EPIC Germany. PloS One 2014; 9: e92005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization. Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. WHO Technical Report Series. 1995. Available from http://www.who.int/childgrowth/publications/physical_status/en/ (accessed on 8 March 2016).

  25. Neamat-Allah J, Wald D, Husing A, Teucher B, Wendt A, Delorme S et al. Validation of anthropometric indices of adiposity against whole-body magnetic resonance imaging—a study within the German European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohorts. PloS One 2014; 9: e91586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang TT, Roberts SB, Howarth NC, McCrory MA . Effect of screening out implausible energy intake reports on relationships between diet and BMI. Obes Res 2005; 13: 1205–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, Scott BJ, Daugherty SA, Koh YO . A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 51: 241–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith DH, Neutel JM, Lacourcière Y, Kempthorne-Rawson J . Prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) designed trials yield the same results as double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with respect to ABPM measurements. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1291–1298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly Jr DW, Schuler TC . Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 2007; 7: 541–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Murakami K, Livingstone MB . Prevalence and characteristics of misreporting of energy intake in US adults: NHANES 2003-2012. Br J Nutr 2015; 114: 1294–1303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Macdiarmid JI, Vail A, Cade JE, Blundell JE . The sugar-fat relationship revisited: differences in consumption between men and women of varying BMI. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22: 1053–1061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gibson SA . Are high-fat, high-sugar foods and diets conducive to obesity? Int J Food Sci Nutr 1996; 47: 405–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Emmett PM, Heaton KW . Is extrinsic sugar a vehicle for dietary fat? Lancet 1995; 345: 1537–1540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Horton TJ, Drougas H, Brachey A, Reed GW, Peters JC, Hill JO . Fat and carbohydrate overfeeding in humans: different effects on energy storage. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 62: 19–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. French SA, Jeffery RW, Forster JL, McGovern PG, Kelder SH, Baxter JE . Predictors of weight change over two years among a population of working adults: the Healthy Worker Project. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1994; 18: 145–154.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kerver JM, Yang EJ, Obayashi S, Bianchi L, Song WO . Meal and snack patterns are associated with dietary intake of energy and nutrients in US adults. J Am Diet Assoc 2006; 106: 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Siri-Tarino PW, Sun Q, Hu FB, Krauss RM . Saturated fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease: modulation by replacement nutrients. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2010; 12: 384–390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mensink RP, Katan MB . Effect of dietary fatty acids on serum lipids and lipoproteins. A meta-analysis of 27 trials. Arterioscler Thromb 1992; 12: 911–919.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lafay L, Mennen L, Basdevant A, Charles MA, Borys JM, Eschwege E et al. Does energy intake underreporting involve all kinds of food or only specific food items? Results from the Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Sante (FLVS) study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 1500–1506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Montoye HJ, Kemper HC, Saris WH, Washburn RA . Measuring Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partly funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF FKZ: 01ER0808). We thank the Human Study Centre (HSC) of the German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, namely the trustee and the examination unit for collecting, the data hub for processing and the participants for providing the data, the biobank for processing the biological samples and the HSC head, Manuela Bergmann, for contributing to the study design and leading the underlying processes of data generation. We also thank the Ernst von Bergmann Klinikum Potsdam for conducting magnetic resonance tomography, the Division of Medical and Biological Informatics at the German Cancer Research Center for processing body composition data and the Institut für Medizinische Diagnostik Berlin - Potsdam for analyzing clinical blood parameters.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Gottschald.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gottschald, M., Knüppel, S., Boeing, H. et al. The influence of adjustment for energy misreporting on relations of cake and cookie intake with cardiometabolic disease risk factors. Eur J Clin Nutr 70, 1318–1324 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.131

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.131

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links