Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Appraising nutrient availability of household food supplies using Block Dietary Screeners for individuals

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 69, pages 1028–1034 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objective:

The growing interest in environmental influences on obesity risk has spawned the development of tools for appraising home food availability. These tools reveal good reliability but tend to be limited in scope and burdensome to use. This cross-sectional study investigated the feasibility of using food categories and scoring algorithms from valid food frequency questionnaires for individuals (that is, Block Dietary Fat and Fruit–Vegetable–Fiber Screeners) to estimate nutrient availability in household food supplies.

Subjects/Methods:

Screeners were compared with household food inventories from 100 two-parent families with ⩾1 children ⩽12 years of age. Inventoried foods were coded to match Screener food groups, and amounts available were converted to total adult daily equivalent servings to express the greatest possible frequency at which each food group could be eaten/day/household. Scoring algorithms were converted to express all scores on a per-day basis. For the most conservative assessment, the highest point was used for day ranges for the Fruit–Vegetable–Fiber Screener and the lowest range point was used for the Fat Screener.

Results:

Spearman's rank-order correlations (r⩾0.76) showed that the Fruit–Vegetable–Fiber Screener ranked households well for fruit/vegetable servings, vitamin C and dietary fiber. The Fat Screener and household inventory were positively correlated (r⩾0.58) for total fat, saturated fat and cholesterol. Concordance of household inventories and the Fruit–Vegetable–Fiber Screener, as determined by kappa with quadratic weighting, were strong and significant. Fat Screener concordance was moderate.

Conclusions:

Results indicate that it is feasible to use the efficient, valid Block Dietary Screeners for individuals to appraise household food supplies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guthrie J, Lin B-H, Frazao E . Role of food prepared away from home in the American diet, 1977-78 versus 1994-96: changes and consequences. J Nutr Educ Behav 2002; 34: 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlson A, Kinsey J, Nadav C . Consumers' retail source of food: a cluster analysis. Fam Econ Nutr Rev 2002; 14: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ransley J, Donnelly J, Botham H, Khara T, Greenwood D, Cade J . Use of supermarket receipts to estimate energy and fat content of food purchased by lean and overweight families. Appetite 2003; 41: 141–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ransley J, Donnelly J, Khara T, Botham H, Arnot H, Greenwood D et al. The use of supermarket till receipts to determine the fat and energy intake in a UK population. Public Health Nutr 2001; 4: 1279–1286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher JO, Mitchell DC, Smiciklas-Wright H, Birch LL . Maternal milk consumption predicts the tradeoff between milk and soft drinks in young girls' diets. J Nutr 2000; 131: 246–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher JO, Mitchell DC, Smiciklas-Wright H, Birch LL . Parental influences on young girls' fruit and vegetable, micronutrient, and fat intakes. J Am Diet Assoc 2002; 102: 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibson E, Wardle J, Watts C . Fruit and vegetable consumption, nutritional knowledge and beliefs in mothers and children. Appetite 1998; 31: 205–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wardle J, Carnell S, Cooke L . Parental control over feeding and children's fruit and vegetable intake: How are they related. J Am Diet Assoc 2005; 105: 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crockett S, Sims L . Environmental influences in children's eating. J Nutr Educ 1995; 27: 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patrick H, Nicklas T . A review of family and social determinants of children's eating patterns and diet quality. J Am Coll Nutr 2005; 24: 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shepherd J, Harden A, Rees R, Brunton G, Garcia J, Oliver S et al. Young people and healthy eating: a systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators. Health Educ Res 2006; 21: 239–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D, French S . Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviors. J Am Diet Assoc 2002; 102: S40–S51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krolner R, Rasmussen M, Brug J, Klepp K-I, Wind M, Due P . Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Part II: qualitative studies. J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8: 112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grimm G, Harnack L, Story M . Factors associated with soft drink consumption in school-aged children. J Am Diet Assoc 2004; 104: 1244–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebbeling C, Feldman H, Osganian S, Chomitz V, Ellenbogen S, Ludwig D . Effects of decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on body weight in adolescents: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 673–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Larson NI, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Burgess-Champoux T . Whole-grain intake correlates among adolescents and young adults: findings from Project EAT. J Am Diet Assoc 2010; 110: 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Maurer Abbot J . Differences in food supplies of U.S. households with and without overweight individuals. Appetite 2008; 52: 479–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McAlister A, Perry C, Parcel G . How individuals, environment, and health behavior interact; Social Cognitive Theory. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Vishwanath K (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research and Practice, 4th edn. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bryant M, Stevens J . Measurement of food availability in the home. Nutr Rev 2006; 64: 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fulkerson J, Nelson M, Lytle L, Moe S, Heitzler C, Pasch K . The validation of a home food inventory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008; 5: 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lytle L, Kubik M, Perry C, Story M, Birnbaum A, Murray D . Influencing healthful food choices in school and home environments: results from the TEENS study. Prev Med 2006; 43: 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kendall A, Olson C, Frongillo E . Relationship of hunger and food insecurity to food availability and consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 1996; 96: 1019–1024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Crockett S, Potter J, Wright M, Bacheller A . Validation of a self-reported shelf inventory to measure food purchase behavior. J Am Diet Assoc 1992; 92: 694–697.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. French S, Shimotsu S, Wall M, Gerlach A . Capturing the spectrum of household food and beverage purchasing behavior: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 2008; 108: 2051–2058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Bryant M, Stevens J . Household food and beverage purchasing. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109: 983–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nielsen A . Homescan. www.homescan.com/homescan/US/EN/Login.htm (accessed 1 March 2009).

  27. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Bredbenner C . Assessing the home food environment using mobile barcode (Universal Product Code) scanning technology. Nutr Food Sci 2010; 40: 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Block G, Thompson F, Hartman A, Larkin F, Guire K . Comparison of two dietary questionnaires validated against multiple dietary records collected during a 1-year period. J Am Diet Assoc 1992; 92: 686–693.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Willett W, Sampson L, Stampfer M, Rosner B, Bain C, Witchi J et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 122: 51–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Willet W . Nutritional Epidmiology. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Block Dietary Data SystemsFat Screener. Berkeley, CA, USA www.nutritionquest.com/wellness/free-assessment-tools-for-individuals/fat-intake-screener/ (accessed 30 April 2013).

  32. Block Dietary Data Systems Fruit/Vegetable/Fiber Screener. Berkeley, CA, USA. www.nutritionquest.com/wellness/free-assessment-tools-for-individuals/fruit-vegetable-fiber-screener/ (accessed 30 April 2013).

  33. Block G, Gillespie C, Rosenbaum E, Jenson C . A rapid food screener to assess fat and fruit and vegetable intake. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18: 284–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Block G, Hartman A, Dresser C, Carroll M, Gannon J, Gardner L . A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124: 453–469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Block G, Hartman A, Naughton D . A reduced dietary questionnaire: development and validation. Epidemiol 1990; 1: 58–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Block G, Woods M, Potosky A, Clifford C . Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 1327–1335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mares-Perlman J, Klein B, Klein R, Ritter L, Fisher M, Freudenheim J . A diet history questionnaire ranks nutrient intake sof middle-aged and older men and women similarly to multiple food records. J Nutr 1993; 123: 489–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Resnicow K, Davis-Hearn M, Smith M, Baranowski T, Lin L, Baranowski J et al. Social-cognitive predictors of fruit and vegetable intake in children. Health Psychol 1997; 16: 272–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Block G, Clifford C, Naughton M, Henderson M, McAdams M . A brief dietary screen for high fat intake. J Nutr Educ 1989; 21: 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Coates R, Serdula M, Byers T, Mokdad A, Jewell S, Leaonard S et al. A brief, telephone-administered food frequency questionnaire can be useful for surveillance of dietary fat intakes. J Nutr 1995; 125: 1473–1483.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Maurer Abbot J, Cussler E . Nutrient profile of household food supplies of families with young children. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109: 2057–2062.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. U.S. Department of Agriculture USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 19. U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.

  43. Coates T, Jeffery R, Wing R . The relationship between persons' relative body weight and the quality and quantity of food stored in their homes. Addict Behav 1978; 3: 179–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Terry K, Beck S . Eating style and food storage habits in the home. Behav Modif 1985; 9: 242–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sanjur D, Haines P, Travis S, Brooks M, Hammons B, Immink M . Food expenditures, consumption, and nutrient availability among New York State EFNEP households. Search Human Ecol 1979; 9: 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  46. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Guide to Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) Requirements. Washington, DC, USA, 1994: http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/Inspections/InspectionGuides/ucm074948.htm (accessed 30 April 2013).

  47. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Maurer Abbot J . Differences in food supplies of U.S. households with and without overweight individuals. Appetite 2009; 52: 479–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion MyPyramid Food Intake Pattern Calorie Levels, CNP-XX. Washington, DC, USA, 2005: http://fycs.ifas.ufl.edu/pyramid/adobe/calories.pdf (accessed 1 March 2009).

  49. Cutler DM, Glaeser EL, Shapiro JM . Why have Americans become more obese? J Econ Perspect 2003; 17: 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kline K . Block Dietary Data Systems [personal communication]. In: Byrd-Bredbenner C, (ed), New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2005.

  51. Lowry R . VassarStats: Website for Statistical Computation. Vassar College. Poughkeepsie, NY, USA, 1998–2014, vassarstats.net.

  52. Raynor H, Polley B, Wing R, Jeffery R . Is dietary fat intake related to liking or household availability of high- and low-fat foods? Obes Res 2004; 12: 816–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Patterson R, Kristal A, Shannon J, Hunt J, White E . Using a household food inventory as an environmental indicator of individual dietary practices. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 272–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bryant M, Stevens J, Wang L, Tabak R, Borja J, Bentley ME . Relationship between home fruit and vegetable availability and infant and maternal dietary intake in African-American families: Evidence from the Exhaustive Home Food Inventory. J Am Diet Assoc 2011; 111: 1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. PubMed Health [Internet]. National Library of Medicine (US): Bethesda, MD, USA, 2013.

  56. Kurtzweil P . Nutritional Info Available for Raw Fruits, Vegetables, Fish. FDA Consumer 1993. http://www.fda.gov/fdac/special/foodlabel/dvs.html (accessed 18 September 2006).

  57. American Diabetes Association, American Dietetic Association Choose your Foods: Exchange Lists for Diabetes. American Diabetes Association: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2008.

  58. Agresti A . An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture Grant Number 2011-68001-30170 and was supported in part by the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    J Martin-Biggers, M Koenings, J M Abbot & C Byrd-Bredbenner

  2. Department of Health Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA

    V Quick

Authors
  1. J Martin-Biggers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Koenings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V Quick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J M Abbot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C Byrd-Bredbenner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Byrd-Bredbenner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin-Biggers, J., Koenings, M., Quick, V. et al. Appraising nutrient availability of household food supplies using Block Dietary Screeners for individuals. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 1028–1034 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.30

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.30

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links