Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Maternal and pediatric nutrition

The effect of dietary counselling on food intakes in pregnant women at risk for gestational diabetes: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial RADIEL

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide. GDM may be prevented by improving the diets of pregnant women. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietary counselling on the diets of pregnant women at GDM risk.

Subjects/Methods:

This study was a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial the Finnish gestational diabetes prevention study (RADIEL) in which pre-pregnant and pregnant women with previous GDM or BMI 30 kg/m2 were allocated into two groups, namely the control and the intervention groups. The control group received standard antenatal dietary counselling according to the Finnish Nutrition Recommendations. The intervention group participated in one individual dietary counselling session and one group dietary counselling session in addition to the standard counselling. This study included women who were recruited during pregnancy. To assess changes in food intake, food-intake questionnaires were collected during the first and the second trimester of pregnancy. Bootstrap type analysis of covariance was used, and 242 participants were included in the final analysis to study changes in food intake.

Results:

The intakes of low-fat cheese (baseline adjusted mean 0.09 times/day; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07, 0.24; P=0.040) and fish (baseline adjusted mean 0.28 times per week; 95% CI 0.08, 0.49; P=0.011) showed a significant increase in the intervention group compared with the control group.

Conclusions:

This study showed that dietary counselling in early pregnancy can lead to modest dietary improvements in pregnant women at GDM risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchanan TA, Xiang A, Kjos SL, Watanabe R . What is gestational diabetes? Diabetes Care 2007; 30 (Suppl 2), S105–S111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2004; 27 (Suppl 1), S88–S90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrara A . Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: a public health perspective. Diabetes Care 2007; 30 (Suppl 2), S141–S146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coustan DR, Lowe LP, Metzger BE, Dyer AR . International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups. The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) study: paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 654.e1–654.e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oostdam N, van Poppel MN, Wouters MG, van Mechelen W . Interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011; 20: 1551–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tieu J, Crowther CA, Middleton P . Dietary advice in pregnancy for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 (2), CD006674.

  7. Jackson RA, Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Gerbert B . Improving diet and exercise in pregnancy with video doctor counseling: a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83: 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kinnunen TI, Pasanen M, Aittasalo M, Fogelholm M, Hilakivi-Clarke L, Weiderpass E et al. Preventing excessive weight gain during pregnancy - a controlled trial in primary health care. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007; 61: 884–891.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinnunen TI, Puhkala J, Raitanen J, Ahonen S, Aittasalo M, Virtanen SM et al. Effects of dietary counselling on food habits and dietary intake of Finnish pregnant women at increased risk for gestational diabetes - a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Matern Child Nutr 2014; 10: 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guelinckx I, Devlieger R, Mullie P, Vansant G . Effect of lifestyle intervention on dietary habits, physical activity, and gestational weight gain in obese pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91: 373–380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Piirainen T, Isolauri E, Lagstrom H, Laitinen K . Impact of dietary counselling on nutrient intake during pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Br J Nutr 2006; 96: 1095–1104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Korpi-Hyovalti E, Schwab U, Laaksonen DE, Linjama H, Heinonen S, Niskanen L . Effect of intensive counselling on the quality of dietary fats in pregnant women at high risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Br J Nutr 2012; 108: 910–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Nutrition Council Finnish Nutrition Recommendations, version 2005. Helsinki: Edita publishing oy. Finland, 2005 (in Finnish).

  14. Institute of Medicine. (Subcommittees on Nutritional Status and Weight Gain During Pregnancy and Dietary Intake and Nutrient Supplements During Pregnancy, Committee on Nutritional Status During Pregnancy and Lactation, Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences). Nutrition during pregnancy: Part I, Weight Gain; Part II, Nutrient Supplements. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA 1990.

  15. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2008. Diabetes Care 2008; 31 (Suppl 2), S12–S54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolff S, Legarth J, Vangsgaard K, Toubro S, Astrup A . A randomized trial of the effects of dietary counseling on gestational weight gain and glucose metabolism in obese pregnant women. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32: 495–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gray-Donald K, Robinson E, Collier A, David K, Renaud L, Rodrigues S . Intervening to reduce weight gain in pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus in Cree communities: an evaluation. CMAJ 2000; 163: 1247–1251.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Widga AC, Lewis NM . Defined, in-home, prenatal nutrition intervention for low-income women. J Am Diet Assoc 1999; 99: 1058–1062. quiz 1063-4, 1175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luoto R, Kinnunen TI, Aittasalo M, Kolu P, Raitanen J, Ojala K et al. Primary prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and large-for-gestational-age newborns by lifestyle counseling: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 2011; 8: e1001036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koivusalo SB, Rono K, Klemetti MM et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus can be prevented by lifestyle intervention: the Finnish gestational diabetes prevention study (RADIEL): a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2015; e-pub ahead of print 29 July 2015.

  21. Bao W, Bowers K, Tobias DK, Hu FB, Zhang C . Prepregnancy dietary protein intake, major dietary protein sources, and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 2001–2008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Aune D, Norat T, Romundstad P, Vatten LJ . Dairy products and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 98: 1066–1083.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wallin A, Di Giuseppe D, Orsini N, Patel PS, Forouhi NG, Wolk A . Fish consumption, dietary long-chain n-3 fatty acids, and risk of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 918–929.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Park S, Kim MY, Baik SH, Woo JT, Kwon YJ, Daily JW et al. Gestational diabetes is associated with high energy and saturated fat intakes and with low plasma visfatin and adiponectin levels independent of prepregnancy BMI. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67: 196–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartz D, Fischhoff B, Krishnamurti T, Sowell F . The Hawthorne effect and energy awareness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: 15242–15246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prentice AM, Black AE, Coward WA, Davies HL, Goldberg GR, Murgatroyd PR et al. High levels of energy expenditure in obese women. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 1986; 292: 983–987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Livingstone MB, Prentice AM, Strain JJ, Coward WA, Black AE, Barker ME et al. Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health. BMJ 1990; 300: 708–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rennie KL, Coward A, Jebb SA . Estimating under-reporting of energy intake in dietary surveys using an individualised method. Br J Nutr 2007; 97: 1169–1176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rautio N, Jokelainen J, Saaristo T, Oksa H et alKeinänen-Kiukaanniemi S; FIN-D2D Writing Group. Predictors of success of a lifestyle intervention in relation to weight loss and improvement in glucose tolerance among individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes: the FIN-D2D project. J Prim Care Community Health 2013; 4: 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The RADIEL study was supported by Ahokas Foundation, Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Disease, Special state subsidy for health science research of Helsinki University Central Hospital, Samfundet Folkhälsan, the Finnish Diabetes Research Foundation, State Provincial Office of Southern Finland and the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. The funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.

Author contributions

AV, SK, JM, JL, BS-L, KR, MK, HK, MP-A, AT, EH, HL, SA, RR and JE designed and conducted the study; AV and HK analysed the data; AV interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript; SK, JM, JL, BS-L, KR, MK, HK, MP-A, AT, EH, HL, SA, RR and JE gave their comments of the first version of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Valkama.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valkama, A., Koivusalo, S., Lindström, J. et al. The effect of dietary counselling on food intakes in pregnant women at risk for gestational diabetes: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial RADIEL. Eur J Clin Nutr 70, 912–917 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.205

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.205

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links