Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Food and health

Neural effects of green tea extract on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 66, pages 1187–1192 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/objectives:

Green tea is being recognized as a beverage with potential benefits for human health and cognitive functions. In vivo studies provide preliminary evidence that green tea intake may have a positive role in improving effects on cognitive functions. We aimed to examine the neural effects of green tea extract on brain activation in humans.

Subjects/methods:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging was recorded while 12 healthy volunteers performed a working memory task following administration of 250 or 500 ml of a milk whey based green tea containing soft drink or milk whey based soft drink without green tea as control in a double-blind, controlled repeated measures within-subject design with counterbalanced order of substance administration. A whole-brain analysis with a cluster-level threshold of P<0.001 (unadjusted) was followed by an a priori-defined region of interest (ROI) analysis of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) including a cluster-level threshold of P<0.05 and family-wise error (FWE) adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Results:

Whole-brain analyses revealed no significant effects after correction for multiple comparisons (FWE P<0.05). Using a ROI approach, green tea extract increased activation in the DLPFC relative to a control condition (FWE P<0.001). This neural effect was related to green tea dosage. Green tea extract was not associated with any significant attenuation in regional activation relative to control condition.

Conclusions:

These data suggest that green tea extract may modulate brain activity in the DLPFC, a key area that mediates working memory processing in the human brain. Moreover, this is the first neuroimaging study implicating that functional neuroimaging methods provide a means of examining how green tea extract acts on the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cabrera C, Artacho R, Gimenez R . Beneficial effects of green tea—a review. J Am Coll Nutr 2006; 25: 79–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mandel S, Maor G, Youdim MB . Iron and alpha-synuclein in the substantia nigra of MPTP-treated mice: effect of neuroprotective drugs R-apomorphine and green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. J Mol Neurosci 2004; 24: 401–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandel S, Weinreb O, Amit T, Youdim MB . Cell signaling pathways in the neuroprotective actions of the green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate: implications for neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurochem 2004; 88: 1555–1569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuriyama S, Hozawa A, Ohmori K, Shimazu T, Matsui T, Ebihara S et al. Green tea consumption and cognitive function: a cross-sectional study from the Tsurugaya Project 1. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83: 355–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ng TP, Feng L, Niti M, Kua EH, Yap KB . Tea consumption and cognitive impairment and decline in older Chinese adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88: 224–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharyya S, Fusar-Poli P, Borgwardt S, Martin-Santos R, Nosarti C, O’Carroll C et al. Modulation of mediotemporal and ventrostriatal function in humans by Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol: a neural basis for the effects of Cannabis sativa on learning and psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66: 442–451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Borgwardt SJ, Allen P, Bhattacharyya S, Fusar-Poli P, Crippa JA, Seal ML et al. Neural basis of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol: effects during response inhibition. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 64: 966–973.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fusar-Poli P, Crippa JA, Bhattacharyya S, Borgwardt SJ, Allen P, Martin-Santos R et al. Distinct effects of {delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on neural activation during emotional processing. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66: 95–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhattacharyya S, Crippa JA, Allen P, Martin-Santos R, Borgwardt S, Fusar-Poli P et al. Induction of psychosis by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol reflects modulation of prefrontal and striatal function during attentional salience processing. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69: 27–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Winton-Brown T, Allen P, Bhattacharrya S, Borgwardt SJ, Fusar-Poli P, Crippa JA et al. Modulation of auditory and visual processing by Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol: an fMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011; 36: 1340–1348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Martín-Santos R, Crippa JA, Batalla A, Bhattacharyya S, Atakan Z, Fusar-Poli P et al. Acute effects of a single, oral dose of THC and cannabidiol administration in healthy volunteers. Curr Pharm Des 2012 e-pub ahead of print 7 June 2012.

  12. Ettinger U, Williams SC, Fannon D, Premkumar P, Kuipers E, Moller HJ et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of a parametric working memory task in schizophrenia: relationship with performance and effects of antipsychotic treatment. Psychopharmacology 2011; 216: 17–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Owen WJ, Borowsky R, Sarty GEFMRI . of two measures of phonological processing in visual word recognition: ecological validity matters. Brain Lang 2004; 90: 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smieskova R, Allen P, Simon A, Aston J, Bendfeldt K, Drewe J et al. Different duration of at-risk mental state associated with neurofunctional abnormalities – a multimodal imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp 2011 e-pub ahead of print 16 September 2011; doi:10.1002/hbm.21360.

  15. Hayasaka S, Nichols TE . Combining voxel intensity and cluster extent with permutation test framework. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Petersson KM, Nichols TE, Poline JB, Holmes AP . Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging. I. Non-inferential methods and statistical models. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999; 354: 1239–1260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mai J, Paxinos G, Voss T Atlas of the Human Brain. Academic Press: San Diego, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dupont WD, Plummer WD . Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 1990; 11: 116–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Haque AM, Hashimoto M, Katakura M, Tanabe Y, Hara Y, Shido O . Long-term administration of green tea catechins improves spatial cognition learning ability in rats. J Nutr 2006; 136: 1043–1047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaur T, Pathak CM, Pandhi P, Khanduja KL . Effects of green tea extract on learning, memory, behavior and acetylcholinesterase activity in young and old male rats. Brain Cogn 2008; 67: 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goswami M, Mund S, Ray A . Effects of some psychotropic agents on cognitive functions in rats. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 40: 75–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Unno K, Takabayashi F, Kishido T, Oku N . Suppressive effect of green tea catechins on morphologic and functional regression of the brain in aged mice with accelerated senescence (SAMP10). Exp Gerontol 2004; 39: 1027–1034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Unno K, Takabayashi F, Yoshida H, Choba D, Fukutomi R, Kikunaga N et al. Daily consumption of green tea catechin delays memory regression in aged mice. Biogerontology 2007; 8: 89–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Haque AM, Hashimoto M, Katakura M, Hara Y, Shido O . Green tea catechins prevent cognitive deficits caused by Abeta1-40 in rats. J Nutr Biochem 2008; 19: 619–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rezai-Zadeh K, Arendash GW, Hou H, Fernandez F, Jensen M, Runfeldt M et al. Green tea epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) reduces beta-amyloid mediated cognitive impairment and modulates tau pathology in Alzheimer transgenic mice. Brain Res 2008; 1214: 177–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rezai-Zadeh K, Shytle D, Sun N, Mori T, Hou H, Jeanniton D et al. Green tea epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) modulates amyloid precursor protein cleavage and reduces cerebral amyloidosis in Alzheimer transgenic mice. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 8807–8814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim DK, Lee K . Inhibitory effect of trans-N-p-coumaroyl tryamine from the twigs of Celtis chinensis on the acetylcholinesterase. Arch Pharm Res 2003; 26: 735–738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Melzig MF, Janka M . Enhancement of neutral endopeptidase activity in SK-N-SH cells by green tea extract. Phytomedicine 2003; 10: 494–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ayoub S, Melzig MF . Induction of neutral endopeptidase (NEP) activity of SK-N-SH cells by natural compounds from green tea. J Pharm Pharmacol 2006; 58: 495–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chou CW, Huang WJ, Tien LT, Wang SJ . (−)-Epigallocatechin gallate, the most active polyphenolic catechin in green tea, presynaptically facilitates Ca2+-dependent glutamate release via activation of protein kinase C in rat cerebral cortex. Synapse 2007; 61: 889–902.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilkinson D, Halligan P . The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5: 67–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This initiator-driven (CB) study was sponsored by the University of Basel and supported by grants from the Rivella Ltd, Rothrist, Switzerland. We would like to thank Doris Blaser for her help to prepare the manuscript.

Author Contributions

JD and CB designed the research, FH and SJB collected the data, KS provided essential materials. SJB analyzed data and performed statistical analysis. All authors wrote the paper. SJB and CB had primary responsibility for the final content.

Disclosure

The sponsor of the study had no role in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of this report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Hospital Basel, Medical Image Analysis Centre, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    S Borgwardt

  2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    S Borgwardt & F Hammann

  3. Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK

    S Borgwardt

  4. Department of High-Field MR, Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany

    K Scheffler

  5. Alpinia Laudanum Institute of Phytopharmaceutical Sciences, Walenstadt, Switzerland

    M Kreuter

  6. Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    J Drewe & C Beglinger

Authors
  1. S Borgwardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F Hammann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K Scheffler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M Kreuter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J Drewe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C Beglinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Borgwardt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borgwardt, S., Hammann, F., Scheffler, K. et al. Neural effects of green tea extract on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 1187–1192 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.105

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.105

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links