Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Nutritional quality and labelling of ready-to-eat breakfast cereals: the contribution of the French observatory of food quality

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

To assess developments in the nutritional quality of food products in various food groups in France, an Observatory of Food Quality (Oqali) was created in 2008. To achieve its aims, Oqali built up a new database to describe each specific food item at the most detailed level, and also included economic parameters (market share and mean prices). The objective of this paper is to give a detailed analysis of the monitoring of the ready-to-eat breakfast cereals (RTEBCs) sector in order to show the benefits of the Oqali database.

Subjects/Methods:

Analysis was limited to products with nutritional information on labels. Packaging was provided by manufacturers or retailers, or obtained by buying products in regular stores. Economic parameters were obtained from surveys on French food consumption and data from consumer purchase panels. The breakfast cereal sector was divided into 10 categories and 5 types of brand. Oqali has developed anonymous indicators to describe product characteristics for each category of RTEBC and each type of brand by cross-referencing nutritional values with economic data. Packaging-related data were also analysed. The major nutritional parameters studied were energy, protein, fat, saturated fat, carbohydrates, sugars, fibre and sodium. Analysis was performed on the basis of descriptive statistics, multivariate statistics and a Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results:

For the RTEBC, there is large variability in nutrient content throughout the sector, both within and between product categories. There is no systematic relation between brand type and nutritional quality within each product category, and the proportion of brand type within each product category is different. Nutritional labels, claims and pictograms are widespread on packages but vary according to the type of brand.

Conclusions:

These findings form the basis for monitoring developments in the nutritional composition and packaging-related data for breakfast cereals in the future. The final objective is to expand the approach illustrated here to all food sectors progressively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

References

  • AFSSA (Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments) (2006–2007) Etude Individuelle Nationale des Consommations Alimentaires 2. http://www.afssa.fr/Documents/PASER-Ra-INCA2.pdf.

  • Bertrais S, Polo Luque ML, Preziosi P, Fieux B, Torra De Flot M, Galan P et al. (2000). Contribution of ready-to-eat cereals to nutrition intakes in French adults and relations with corpulence. Ann Nutr Metab 44, 249–255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat SA, Patterson KY, Holden JM (2009). Validation study of the USDA's Data Quality Evaluation System. J Food Compos Anal 22, 366–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame B, Charrondiere R, Mouille B (2009). Food composition is fundamental to the cross-cutting initiative on biodiversity for food and nutrition. J Food Compos Anal 22, 361–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castanheira I, Roe M, Westenbrink S, Ireland J, Moller A, Salvini S et al. (2009). Establishing quality management systems for European food composition databases. Food Chem 113, 776–780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciqual (2008). French food composition table. http://www.afssa.fr/TableCIQUAL/.

  • Cooper S, Nelson M (2003). Economy line foods from our supermarkets and brand name equivalents: a comparison of their nutrient content and costs. J Hum Nutr Diet 16, 339–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darmon N, Caillavet F, Joly C, Maillot M, Drewnowski A (2009). Low-cost foods: how do they compare with their brand names equivalents? A French study. Public Health Nutr 12, 808–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006). Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:012:0003:0018:EN:PDF.

  • European Commission (2008). Commission Directive 2008/100/EC of 28 October 2008 amending Council Directive 90/496/EEC on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs as regards recommended daily allowances, energy conversion factors and definitions. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1990L0496:20081211:EN:HTML.

  • French Ministry of Health (2006). The second National Nutrition and Health Programme, 2006–2010 (PNNS 2). Action and measures. http://www.sante.gouv.fr/htm/pointsur/nutrition/documents_english/pnns2.pdf.

  • Galvin MA, Kiely M, Flynn A (2003). Impact of ready-to-eat breakfast cereal (RTEBC) consumption on adequacy of micronutrient intakes and compliance with dietary recommendations in Irish adults. Public Health Nutr 6, 351–363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kantar Worldpanel (2010): http://www.kantarworldpanel.com.

  • Ireland JD, Møller A (2000). Review of International Food Classification and Description. J Food Compos Anal 13, 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalor F, Kennedy J, Flynn MA, Wall PG (2010). A study of nutrition and health claims–a snapshot of what's on the Irish market. Public Health Nutr 13, 704–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancino L, Kuchler F, Leibtag E (2008). Getting consumers to eat more whole-grains: the role of policy, information, and food manufacturers. Food Policy 33, 489–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maras JE, Newby PK, Bakun PJ, Ferrucci L, Tucker KL (2009). Whole grain intake: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Food Compos Anal 22, 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro-Bethancourt G, Vossenaar M, Kuijper LD, Doak CM, Solomons NW (2009). Ready-to-eat cereals are key sources of selected micronutrients among schoolchildren from public and private elementary schools in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala. Nutr Res 29, 335–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nijman CA, Zijp IM, Sierksma A, Roodenburg AJ, Leenen R, Van den Kerkhoff C et al. (2007). A method to improve the nutritional quality of foods and beverages based on dietary recommendations. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 461–471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obépi-Roche (2009). Enquête épidémiologique nationale sur le surpoids et l’obésité. http://www.roche.fr/portal/eipf/france/rochefr/institutionnel/obepi_roche_2009.

  • Oqali (2009). Etude du secteur des céréales pour le petit-déjeuner. www.oqali.fr.

  • Ratnayake WM, L’Abbe MR, Mozaffarian D (2009). Nationwide product reformulations to reduce trans fatty acids in Canada: when trans fat goes out, what goes in? Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 808–811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez S, Casilli AA (2008). Status and use of food products with health claim (FPHC) in the USA, Japan and France an anthropological perspective. Food Qual Prefer 19, 682–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Boom A, Serra-Majem L, Ribas L, Ngo J, Pérez-Rodrigo C, Aranceta J et al. (2006). The contribution of ready-to-eat cereals to daily nutrient intake and breakfast quality in a Mediterranean setting. J Am Coll Nutr 25, 135–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster LJ, Dunford KE, Neal CB (2010). A systematic survey of the sodium contents of processed foods. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 413–420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young L, Swinburn B (2002). Impact of the Pick the Tick food information programme on the salt content of food in New Zealand. Health Promot Int 17, 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L G Soler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goglia, R., Spiteri, M., Ménard, C. et al. Nutritional quality and labelling of ready-to-eat breakfast cereals: the contribution of the French observatory of food quality. Eur J Clin Nutr 64 (Suppl 3), S20–S25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.205

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.205

Keywords

  • nutritional composition
  • food supply
  • economic parameters
  • ready-to-eat breakfast cereals
  • nutritional labels

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links