Abstract
Background/Objectives:
Recently, urinary fructose and sucrose excretion in 24-h urine have been established experimentally as new biomarkers for dietary sugar intake in adults. Our objective was to investigate 1) whether the fructose biomarker is also applicable in free-living children and 2) for what kind of sugar it is standing for.
Subjects/Methods:
Intakes of added and total sugar (including additional sugar from fruit and fruit juices) were assessed by 3-day weighed dietary records in 114 healthy prepubertal children; corresponding 24-h urinary fructose excretion was measured photometrically. The associations between dietary sugar intakes and urinary fructose excretion were examined using linear regression models. To determine whether one of the two sugar variables may be better associated with the urinary biomarker, the statistical Pitman's test was used.
Results:
Added and total sugar correlated significantly with urinary fructose, but the linear regression indicated a weak association between intake of added sugar and urinary log-fructose excretion (β=0.0026, R2=0.055, P=0.01). The association between total sugar intake and log-urinary fructose (β=0.0040, R2=0.181, P<0.001) showed a significantly better fit (P<0.05).
Conclusions:
Urinary fructose excretion seems to be rather applicable for the estimation of total sugar intake than for the estimation of added dietary sugar intake in children. However, as excreted fructose stems almost exclusively from the diet (both from food-intrinsic and added intakes), it can be assumed that urinary fructose represents a potential biomarker for total dietary fructose intake, irrespective of its source.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelopoulos TJ, Lowndes J, Zukley L, Melanson KJ, Nguyen V, Huffman A et al. (2009). The effect of high-fructose corn syrup consumption on triglycerides and uric acid. J Nutr 139, S1242–S1245.
Bingham S, Luben R, Welch A, Tasevska N, Wareham N, Khaw KT (2007). Epidemiologic assessment of sugars consumption using biomarkers: comparisons of obese and nonobese individuals in the European prospective investigation of cancer Norfolk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16, 1651–1654.
Bingham SA, Cassidy A, Cole TJ, Welch A, Runswick SA, Black AE et al. (1995). Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers. Br J Nutr 73, 531–550.
Biro G, Hulshof KF, Ovesen L, Amorim Cruz JA (2002). Selection of methodology to assess food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 56 (Suppl 2), S25–S32.
Englyst KN, Liu S, Englyst HN (2007). Nutritional characterization and measurement of dietary carbohydrates. Eur J Clin Nutr 61 (Suppl 1), S19–S39.
Gibson R (2005). Validity in dietary assessment methods. In: R. Gibson (ed). Principles of Nutritional Assessment. Oxford University Press: New York, pp 161–187.
Jenab M, Slimani N, Bictash M, Ferrari P, Bingham SA (2009). Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology: applications, needs and new horizons. Hum Genet 125, 507–525.
Johansson L, Solvoll K, Bjorneboe GE, Drevon CA (1998). Under- and overreporting of energy intake related to weight status and lifestyle in a nationwide sample. Am J Clin Nutr 68, 266–274.
Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, Nakagawa T, Feig DI, Kang DH et al. (2007). Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 899–906.
Jones JM (2009). Dietary sweeteners containing fructose: overview of a workshop on the state of the science. J Nutr 139, S1210–S1213.
Joosen AM, Kuhnle GG, Runswick SA, Bingham SA (2008). Urinary sucrose and fructose as biomarkers of sugar consumption: comparison of normal weight and obese volunteers. Int J Obes (Lond) 32, 1736–1740.
Kroke A, Manz F, Kersting M, Remer T, Sichert-Hellert W, Alexy U et al. (2004). The DONALD Study. History, current status and future perspectives. Eur J Nutr 43, 45–54.
Libuda L, Kersting M (2009). Soft drinks and body weight development in childhood: is there a relationship? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 12, 596–600.
Luceri C, Caderni G, Lodovici M, Spagnesi MT, Monserrat C, Lancioni L et al. (1996). Urinary excretion of sucrose and fructose as a predictor of sucrose intake in dietary intervention studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5, 167–171.
Preece MA, Baines MJ (1978). A new family of mathematical models describing the human growth curve. Ann Hum Biol 5, 1–24.
Remer T, Fonteyn N, Alexy U, Berkemeyer S (2006). Longitudinal examination of 24-h urinary iodine excretion in schoolchildren as a sensitive, hydration status-independent research tool for studying iodine status. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 639–646.
Schofield WN (1985). Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 39 (Suppl 1), 5–41.
Sichert-Hellert W, Kersting M, Chahda C, Schaefer R, Kroke A (2007). German food composition database for dietary evaluations in children and adolescents. J Food Comp Anal 20, 63–70.
Sichert-Hellert W, Kersting M, Schoch G (1998). Underreporting of energy intake in 1–18 year old German children and adolescents. Z Ernahrungswiss 37, 242–251.
Sigman-Grant M, Morita J (2003). Defining and interpreting intakes of sugars. Am J Clin Nutr 78, S815–S826.
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1987). Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA.
Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Keim NL, Griffen SC, Bremer AA, Graham JL et al. (2009). Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J Clin Invest 119, 1322–1334.
Tasevska N, Runswick SA, McTaggart A, Bingham SA (2005). Urinary sucrose and fructose as biomarkers for sugar consumption. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14, 1287–1294.
Tasevska N, Runswick SA, Welch AA, McTaggart A, Bingham SA (2009). Urinary sugars biomarker relates better to extrinsic than to intrinsic sugars intake in a metabolic study with volunteers consuming their normal diet. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 653–659.
Vos MB, Kimmons JE, Gillespie C, Welsh J, Blanck HM (2008). Dietary fructose consumption among US children and adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Medscape J Med 10, 160.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported in part by the Long-range Research Initiative (LRI) of the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic). The DONALD study is funded by the Ministry of Science and Research of North Rhine Westphalia, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johner, S., Libuda, L., Shi, L. et al. Urinary fructose: a potential biomarker for dietary fructose intake in children. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 1365–1370 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.160
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.160
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Cohort profile update–overview of over 35 years of research in the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) study
European Journal of Nutrition (2024)
-
Relevance of fructose intake in adolescence for fatty liver indices in young adulthood
European Journal of Nutrition (2021)
-
Urinary sucrose and fructose to validate self-reported sugar intake in children and adolescents: results from the I.Family study
European Journal of Nutrition (2019)
-
Hyperosmolarity drives hypertension and CKD—water and salt revisited
Nature Reviews Nephrology (2014)