Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Is the 1975 Reference Man still a suitable reference?

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 64, pages 1035–1042 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objective:

In 1975, a Reference Man for the estimation of radiation doses without adverse health effects was created. However, during the past few decades, considerable changes in body weight and body composition were observed, as a result of which, new in vivo technologies of body composition analysis are now available. Thus, the Reference Man might be outdated as adequate standard to assess medication and radiation doses. The objective of this study was to compare body composition of an adult population with 1975 Reference Man data, thereby questioning its value as a suitable reference.

Methods:

Body composition was assessed in 208 healthy, Caucasian subjects (105 males, 103 females) aged 18–78 years with a body mass index range of 16.8–35.0 kg/m2. Fat mass (FM) and muscle mass (MM) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, organ masses (OMs) were measured by magnetic resonance imaging.

Results:

There was a considerable variance in body weight and body composition. When compared with Reference Man, great differences in body composition were found. Men and women of the study population were heavier, taller and had more FM, MM and higher masses of brain, heart and spleen. These differences did not depend on age. Relationships between body weight and body composition were investigated by general linear regression models, whereby deviations in FM, MM and heart mass disappeared, whereas differences in brain and spleen mass persisted.

Conclusions:

Our data indicate the need of a modern Reference Man and thus a recalculation of medical radiation doses and medication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  • Aloia JF, Vaswani A, Mikhail M, Flaster ER (1999). Body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in black compared with white women. Osteoporos Int 10, 114–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosy-Westphal A, Reinecke U, Schlorke T, Illner K, Kutzner D, Heller M et al. (2004). Effect of organ and tissue masses on resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight and obese adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 72–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brownbill RA, Ilich JZ (2005). Measuring body composition in overweight individuals by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. BMC Med Imaging 5, 1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Duck FA (1990). Physical properties of tissue. Academic Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher D, Albu J, He Q, Heshka S, Boxt L, Krasnow N et al. (2006). Small organs with a high metabolic rate explain lower resting energy expenditure in African American than in white adults. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 1062–1067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher D, Belmonte D, Deurenberg P, Wang Z, Krasnow N, Pi-Sunyer FX et al. (1998). Organ-tissue mass measurement allows modeling of REE and metabolically active tissue mass. Am J Physiol 275, E249–E258.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasperino J (1996). Ethnic differences in body composition and their relation to health and disease in women. Ethn Health 1, 337–347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gately PJ, Radley D, Cooke CB, Carroll S, Oldroyd B, Truscott JG et al. (2003). Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese children. J Appl Physiol 95, 2039–2046.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heymsfield SB, Gallagher D, Mayer L, Beetsch J, Pietrobelli A (2007). Scaling of human body composition to stature: new insights into body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 82–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Wang Z, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN, Gallagher D (2002). Total-body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 378–383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti-Koski M, Seppanen-Nuijten E, Mannisto S, Harkanen T, Rissanen H, Knekt P et al. (2009). Twenty-year changes in the prevalence of obesity among Finnish adults. Obes Rev 11, 171–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laskey MA, Lyttle KD, Flaxman ME, Barber RW (1992). The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode. Eur J Clin Nutr 46, 39–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman TG, Chen Z (2005). Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorpiometry. In: Heymsfield SB, T.G. L, Wang Z, Going SB (eds). Human Body Composition. Human Kinetics: Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max Rubner Institute FRCfNaF (2008). Ergebnisbericht Teil 1, Nationale Verzehrsstudie II. Max Rubner Institute FRCfNaF: Karlsruhe.

  • Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM (2006). Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA 295, 1549–1555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman M, Temple JR, Breitkopf CR, Berenson AB (2009). Racial differences in body fat distribution among reproductive-aged women. Metabolism 58, 1329–1337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roche AF (1979). Secular trends in human growth, maturation, and development. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 44, 1–120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roubenoff R, Kehayias JJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Heymsfield SB (1993). Use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in body-composition studies: not yet a ‘gold standard’. Am J Clin Nutr 58, 589–591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slosman DO, Casez JP, Pichard C, Rochat T, Fery F, Rizzoli R et al. (1992). Assessment of whole-body composition with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Radiology 185, 593–598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder WS, Cook MJ, Nasset ES, Karhausen LR, Howells GP, Tipton IH (1975). Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. Pergamon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparti A, DeLany JP, de la Bretonne JA, Sander GE, Bray GA (1997). Relationship between resting metabolic rate and the composition of the fat-free mass. Metabolism 46, 1225–1230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Visser M, Fuerst T, Lang T, Salamone L, Harris TB (1999). Validity of fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring fat-free mass and leg muscle mass. Health, aging, and body composition Study–Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and body composition Working Group. J Appl Physiol 87, 1513–1520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle J, Boniface D (2008). Changes in the distributions of body mass index and waist circumference in English adults, 1993/1994 to 2002/2003. Int J Obes (Lond) 32, 527–532.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinsier RL, Hunter GR, Gower BA, Schutz Y, Darnell BE, Zuckerman PA (2001). Body fat distribution in white and black women: different patterns of intraabdominal and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue utilization with weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr 74, 631–636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2000). Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation on Obesity. WHO Technical Report Series: Geneva.

  • Wu CH, Heshka S, Wang J, Pierson Jr RN, Heymsfield SB, Laferrere B et al. (2007). Truncal fat in relation to total body fat: influences of age, sex, ethnicity and fatness. Int J Obes (Lond) 31, 1384–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by DFG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany

    W Later, A Bosy-Westphal & M J Müller

  2. Division of Medical Physics, Clinic for diagnostic radiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany

    E Kossel & C-C Glüer

  3. Clinic for Diagnostic Radiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany

    M Heller

Authors
  1. W Later
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Bosy-Westphal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E Kossel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C-C Glüer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M Heller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M J Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M J Müller.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Later, W., Bosy-Westphal, A., Kossel, E. et al. Is the 1975 Reference Man still a suitable reference?. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 1035–1042 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.125

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.125

Keywords

  • Reference Man
  • body composition
  • organ mass
  • magnetic resonance imaging

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links