Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science

Conceptual illustration showing the chatbot as a magical genie emerging from a computer.

Illustration by Paweł Jońca

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 614, 214-216 (2023)


Updates & Corrections

  • Correction 08 February 2023: This News feature misrepresented Scott Aaronson’s views on the accuracy of watermarking in identifying AI-produced text. Human-produced text might also be flagged as having a watermark, but the probability is extremely low.


  1. Pividori, M. & Greene, C. S. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).

  2. GPT, Osmanovic Thunström, A. & Steingrimsson, S. Preprint at HAL (2022).

  3. Nature Mach. Intell. 5, 1 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Glaese, A. et al. Preprint at (2022).

  5. Thorp, H. H. Science 379, 313 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirchenbauer, J. et al. Preprint at (2023).

  7. Singhal, K. et al. Preprint at (2022).

Download references


Latest on:

Nature Careers


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing


Quick links