Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

No stopping with a short-stem transfer RNA

Messenger RNA has 64 possible triplet sequences, or codons, three of which usually terminate protein synthesis. But some organisms can use all codons to specify amino acids, thanks in part to a surprising feature of a transfer RNA.
  1. Pavel V. Baranov

    1. Pavel V. Baranov is in the School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork, Cork T12 XF62, Ireland.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  2. John F. Atkins

    1. John F. Atkins is in the School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork, Cork T12 XF62, Ireland.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

When a protein is made, a chain of amino-acid residues is built on the basis of messenger RNA instructions, and this construction must be brought to a stop appropriately. Writing in Nature, Kachale et al.1 report the discovery of an unusual mechanism that breaks with the conventional way in which the mRNA decoding process occurs.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 613, 631-632 (2023)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04585-5

Updates & Corrections

  • Correction 24 February 2023: The original version of this News & Views showed the placement of amino acid on tRNAs incorrectly. The figure has been corrected.

References

  1. Kachale, A. et al. Nature 613, 751–758 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Swart, E. C., Serra, V., Petroni, G. & Nowacki, M. Cell 166, 691–702 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heaphy, S. M., Mariotti, M., Gladyshev, V. N., Atkins, J. F. & Baranov, P. V. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 2885–2889 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Záhonová, K., Kostygov, A. Y., Ševčíková, T., Yurchenko, V. & Eliáš, M. Curr Biol. 26, 2364–2369 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachvaroff, T. R. PLoS ONE 14, e0212912 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu, C., Roy, B., He, F., Yan, K. & Jacobson, A. Cell Rep. 33, 108399 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ivanov, A. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 8630–8639 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmeing, T. M., Voorhees, R. M., Kelley, A. C. & Ramakrishnan, V. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 432–436 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan, P. P. & Lowe, T. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D184–D189 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suzuki, T. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 375–392 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links