Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

Female birds disguised as males get extra food

Around 20% of female hummingbirds have plumage that is characteristic of the males of the species. Evidence for why this happens offers a surprising perspective on how evolution helps to maintain colour variations.
  1. Tim Caro

    1. Tim Caro is in the School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK, and at the Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, USA.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

The breathtaking palette of colours seen in nature is the fuel that drives many of us to become biologists, and is the reason why some researchers try to understand the biological basis of animal and plant coloration1. Normally, the drivers of such evolutionary processes can be bracketed into categories that result in colour for protection, signalling or physiological reasons2. Writing in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Falk et al.3 propose an evolutionary driver with a new twist.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 610, 259-260 (2022)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03177-7

References

  1. Cuthill, I. C. et al. Science 357, eaan0221 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caro, T. BioScience 55, 125–136 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Falk, J. J., Rubenstein, D. R., Rico-Guevara, A. & Webster, M. S. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20220332 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ford, E. B. Biol. Rev. 20, 73–88 (1945).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedrick, P. W. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 535–566 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hedrick, P. W. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 698–704 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roulin, A. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 79, 815–848 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bond, A. B. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 489–514 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prum, R. O. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 172, 910–941 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Falk, J. J., Webster, M. S. & Rubenstein, D. R. Curr. Biol. 31, 4381–4387 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shuster, S. M. in Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology (eds Fox, C. & Westneat, D. F.) 434–450 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kjernsmo, K. et al. Curr. Biol. 30, 551–555 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, A. L. et al. Curr. Biol. 30, 3470–3476 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng, K. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20220678 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace, A. R. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 1, 1–71 (1865).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links