Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The controversial embryo tests that promise a better baby

Conceptual illustration showing a scientist looking into a crystal ball with an embryo inside.

Illustration by Paweł Jońca

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 609, 668-671 (2022)


Updates & Corrections

  • Correction 06 October 2022: An earlier version of this feature misquoted Matthew Rabinowitz as saying that diseases and disabilities are transferred from one generation to the next.


  1. Khera, A. V. et al. Nature Genet. 50, 1219–1224 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, A. et al Nature Med. 28, 513–516 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Treff, N. R. et al. Front. Endocrinol. 10, 845 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Turley, P. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 78–86 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Forzano, F. et al. Eur. J. Human Genet. 30, 493–495 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Treff, N. R. et al. Genes 11, 648 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karavani, E. et al. Cell 179, 1424–1435 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Widen, E., Lello, L., Raben, T. G., Tellier, L. C. A. M. & Hsu, S. D. H. Preprint at medRxiv (2022).

Download references


Latest on:

Nature Careers


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing


Quick links