Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • COMMENT

A century of science boycotts

Researchers have severed global ties before — what happened?
  1. Michael D. Gordin

    1. Michael D. Gordin is professor of the history of science at Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Black and white image of Albert Einstein speaking at a podium at the Royal Albert Hall, with a crowd of people behind him

Albert Einstein was exempted from a 1919–26 boycott of German scientists because of his pacifist views. Credit: Scherl/Süddeutsche Zeitung Photo/Alamy

The orders came from Moscow, and took the world by surprise. Governments elsewhere had not expected a militarized invasion on this scale, reasoning that it would be logistically almost impossible to occupy the territory, and that the local resistance would be prolonged and potentially ruinous to the invading forces. Nonetheless, many nations quickly responded with sanctions and trade embargoes. The United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly condemned the aggressor and demanded immediate withdrawal of all troops.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 606, 27-29 (2022)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01475-8

References

  1. Brainard, J. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adb1981 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burke, M. ‘Invasion of Ukraine Begins Cascade of Decoupling from Russian Science’ Chemistry World (22 March 2022).

  3. Le Grys Norgate, G. In Dictionary of National Biography (1st suppl.) Vol. I, 243–244 (Smith, Elder, 1901).

    Google Scholar 

  4. von Ungern-Sternberg, J. & von Ungern-Sternberg, W. Der Aufruf “An die Kulturwelt!”: Das Manifest der 93 und die Anfänge der Kriegspropaganda im ersten Weltkrieg (Franz Steiner, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stanley, M. Einstein’s War: How Relativity Triumphed Amid the Vicious Nationalism of World War I (Dutton, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Einstein to C. Lanczos, 11 September 1935, 15-246, Albert Einstein Duplicate Archive, Princeton University Library, Rare Books and Special Collections, Box 18, Folder: “C. Lanczos, 1919–1940.”

  7. Bridgman, P. W. Science 89, 179 (1939).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham, L. R. Science 202, 383–390 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sher, G. S. From Pugwash to Putin: A Critical History of US–Soviet Scientific Cooperation (Indiana Univ. Press, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graham, L. & Dezhina, I. Science in the New Russia: Crisis, Aid, Reform (Indiana Univ. Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haricombe, L. J. & Lancaster, F. W. Out in the Cold: Academic Boycotts and the Isolation of South Africa (Information Resources Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tavernise, S. ‘MacArthur Foundation to Close Offices in Russia’ The New York Times (22 July 2015).

Download references

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links