Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Artificial intelligence is breaking patent law

Illustration showing robotic hands building a digital brain

Illustration by Ana Kova

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 605, 616-618 (2022)



  1. DABUS. Food Container and Devices and Methods for Attracting Enhanced Attention. Patent Cooperation Treaty international application PCT/IB2019/057809 (Filed 17 September 2019).

  2. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. [2007] 569 US 576.

  3. Stanková, E. Cambridge Law J. 80, 338–365 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbott, R. UCLA Law Rev. 66, 2–52 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Commissioner of Patents v. Thaler [2022] Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) 62, paras 119–120.

  6. Abbott, R. Washburn Law J. 60, 429–444 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Afshar, M. S. Hastings Sci. Technol. Law J. 13, 55–72 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, D. GRUR Int. 69, 443–456 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schuster, W. M. Washington Lee Law Rev. 75, 1945–2004 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.


Latest on:

Nature Careers


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing


Quick links