Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • COMMENT

The United States needs a department of technology and science policy

Two former NIH directors call for a cabinet-level department to formulate long-range science policy and oversee technology development.
  1. Harold Varmus

    1. Harold Varmus is professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City and a senior associate at the New York Genome Center, New York. He directed the US National Institutes of Health from 1993 to 1999.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  2. Elias Zerhouni

    1. Elias Zerhouni is professor emeritus of radiology and biomedical engineering at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, and directed the US National Institutes of Health from 2002 to 2008.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Unlike most other advanced economies, the United States has typically relied on a diversity of decentralized federal science agencies to design and conduct the government’s research programmes. With funding decisions made by several congressional committees and with minimal oversight from the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in the White House, this approach has been enormously successful.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 600, 30-32 (2021)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03543-x

References

  1. Bush, V. Science — The Endless Frontier (US Government Printing Office, 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  2. US National Research Council. Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology (National Academies Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kline, R. ‘The U.S. needs a federal department of science and technology.’ Sci. Am. (20 February 2021).

  4. Flagg, M. & Garg, A. Issues Sci. Technol. Fall, 51–59 (2021).

  5. Stolberg, S. G. ‘Biden’s 10-year pandemic preparedness plan includes a full-time ‘Mission Control’ office.’ The New York Times (3 September 2021).

  6. Rao, R. ‘The Endless Frontier Act Could Drastically Change NSF.’ IEEE Spectrum (1 June 2021).

  7. Collins, F. S., Schwetz, T. A., Tabak, L. A. & Lander, E. S. Science 373, 165–167 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. US National Research Council. Convergence: Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond (National Academies Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links