Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

Single proton cooled by distant ions

Laser-cooled ions have been used to substantially lower the temperature of a proton located several centimetres away. This technique could be useful in ultraprecise measurements of the properties of antimatter particles.
  1. Manas Mukherjee

    1. Manas Mukherjee is at the Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 117543 Singapore, and at the Center for Quantum Engineering Research and Education, Kolkata, India.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

In a paper in Nature, Bohman et al.1 (the BASE Collaboration) report the cooling of a single proton by a cloud of laser-cooled beryllium ions. Remarkably, the ions were separated from the proton by a distance of about 9 centimetres — which is too far apart for the charges on the ions to have interacted with that of the proton. This means that the ions could not have exerted a direct cooling effect on the proton. Instead, the researchers used an indirect cooling process, mediated by an electric circuit that established an effective interaction. This approach has potential applications in studies of antimatter particles and in the field of quantum information.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 596, 490-491 (2021)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02267-2

References

  1. Bohman, M. et al. Nature 596, 514–518 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. CMS Collaboration. Phys. Lett. B 716, 30–61 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuhauser, W., Hohenstatt, M., Toschek P. E. & Dehmelt, H. Phys. Rev. A 22, 1137–1140 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ulmer, S. et al. Nature 524, 196–199 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schneider, G. et al. Science 358, 1081–1084 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hänsch, T. W. & Schawlow, A. L. Opt. Commun. 13, 68–69 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wineland, D. J. & Dehmelt, H. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 637 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cornell, E. A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1674 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wineland, D. J. & Dehmelt, H. G. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 919 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drullinger, R. E., Wineland, D. J. & Bergquist, J. C. Appl. Phys. 22, 365–368 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links