Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

A bridge across the democracy–expertise divide

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Nature 596, 493-494 (2021)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02006-7

References

  1. 1.

    Flanigan, B., Gölz, P., Gupta, A., Hennig, B. & Procaccia, A. D. Nature 596, 548–552 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Setälä, M. & Smith, G. in The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (eds Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J. & Warren, M. E.) 300–314 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fishkin, J. S. Democracy When the People are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018) .

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gastil, J. & Knobloch, K. Hope for Democracy: How Citizens Can Bring Reason Back into Politics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Warren, M. E., & Gastil, J. J. Polit. 77, 562–574 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    OECD. Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave (OECD, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Subjects

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links